Suppr超能文献

一线阿来替尼、布加替尼和劳拉替尼治疗晚期间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性非小细胞肺癌的成本效益分析。

First-Line Alectinib, Brigatinib, and Lorlatinib for Advanced Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

作者信息

Mudumba Rahul, Nieva Jorge J, Padula William V

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Economics, Alfred E. Mann School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Value Health. 2025 Jul;28(7):1018-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.03.014. Epub 2025 Apr 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib as first-line therapies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer from a US healthcare sector perspective.

METHODS

We developed a 4-state partitioned survival model using progression-free survival, intracranial progression-free survival, and overall survival data from the ALEX, ALTA-1L, and CROWN clinical trials and published network meta-analyses. This model simulated patient transitions through progression-free, central-nervous-system-related progressed disease, non- central nervous system progressed disease, and death states over a 5-year horizon. Costs (2024 USD) included drug acquisition based on median of Department of Veteran Affairs and wholesale acquisition cost prices, healthcare utilization, and adverse events, all sourced from published literature. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were derived using health utilities bootstrapped from these trials and adjusted for adverse events. We performed sensitivity and scenario analyses to evaluate uncertainty and explore various pricing and efficacy specifications.

RESULTS

Over a 5-year horizon, alectinib cost $1 105 814 for 2.85 QALYs gained, brigatinib cost $1 059 283 for 2.66 QALYs gained, and lorlatinib cost $1 163 519 for 2.88 QALYs gained. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for alectinib and lorlatinib versus brigatinib were $245 536/QALY and $481 386/QALY, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY, brigatinib had a 54% chance of being the cost-effective option, with alectinib at 36% and lorlatinib at 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our model slightly favors brigatinib at a $150 000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, substantial uncertainty precludes definitive cost-effectiveness conclusions among the 3 first-line therapies.

摘要

目的

从美国医疗保健部门的角度评估阿来替尼、布格替尼和洛拉替尼作为间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌一线治疗方案的成本效益。

方法

我们利用来自ALEX、ALTA-1L和CROWN临床试验的无进展生存期、颅内无进展生存期和总生存期数据以及已发表的网络荟萃分析,开发了一个四状态分区生存模型。该模型模拟了患者在5年时间内从无进展状态、中枢神经系统相关进展性疾病、非中枢神经系统进展性疾病到死亡状态的转变。成本(2024美元)包括基于退伍军人事务部中位数和批发采购成本价格的药物采购、医疗保健利用和不良事件,所有数据均来自已发表的文献。质量调整生命年(QALYs)通过从这些试验中自抽样并针对不良事件进行调整的健康效用值得出。我们进行了敏感性和情景分析,以评估不确定性并探索各种定价和疗效规格。

结果

在5年时间内,阿来替尼获得2.85个QALYs的成本为1105814美元,布格替尼获得2.66个QALYs的成本为1059283美元,洛拉替尼获得2.88个QALYs的成本为1163519美元。阿来替尼和洛拉替尼相对于布格替尼的增量成本效益比分别为245536美元/QALY和481386美元/QALY。概率敏感性分析表明,在每QALY支付意愿阈值为150000美元时,布格替尼有54%的可能性成为具有成本效益的选择,阿来替尼为36%,洛拉替尼为10%。

结论

尽管我们的模型在每QALY支付意愿阈值为150000美元时略微倾向于布格替尼,但由于存在大量不确定性,无法在这三种一线治疗方案中得出明确的成本效益结论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验