Milner A D, Jeeves M A, Silver P H, Lines C R, Wilson J
Neuropsychologia. 1985;23(3):323-31. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(85)90019-3.
A young acallosal man was intensively tested in a standard simple reaction time (RT) paradigm using briefly-presented lateralized spots for light. In Experiment 1, findings on previous acallosal patients of a large disadvantage for crossed (e.g. right hemifield-left hand) as against uncrossed (e.g. left hemifield-left hand) RTs were replicated. This crossed-uncrossed difference (CUD), as in previous work, turned out to be smaller in a bimanual response task than in the conventional unimanual task. Experiment 2 was a factorial study of unimanual RTs in which (a) stimulus intensity and (b) spatial S-R compatibility, were varied. As in a previously tested patient, decreased intensity resulted in a greatly increased CUD. S-R compatibility on the other hand had no effect on CUD. The results are interpreted as favouring a role for visual commissural neurones in the acallosal CUD, and as evidence against a spatial compatibility hypothesis.
一名年轻的无胼胝体男子在标准简单反应时(RT)范式中接受了密集测试,该范式使用短暂呈现的侧向光点作为视觉刺激。在实验1中,先前对无胼胝体患者的研究结果得到了重复,即交叉反应(如右半视野-左手)的反应时相比非交叉反应(如左半视野-左手)存在较大劣势。与之前的研究一样,这种交叉-非交叉差异(CUD)在双手反应任务中比传统单手任务中更小。实验2是一项关于单手反应时的析因研究,其中(a)刺激强度和(b)空间刺激-反应兼容性发生了变化。与之前测试的一名患者情况相同,刺激强度降低导致CUD大幅增加。另一方面,刺激-反应兼容性对CUD没有影响。这些结果被解释为支持视交叉神经元在无胼胝体患者的CUD中起作用,并作为反对空间兼容性假说的证据。