• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对大学生社交焦虑障碍的基于互联网自助干预的长期结果与成本效益:一项随机对照试验的结果

Long-Term Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of an Internet-Based Self-Help Intervention for Social Anxiety Disorder in University Students: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Kählke Fanny, Buntrock Claudia, Smit Filip, Berger Thomas, Baumeister Harald, Ebert David Daniel

机构信息

School of Medicine and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, Professorship for Psychology and Digital Mental Health Care, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Institute for Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2023 Nov 17;2023:7912017. doi: 10.1155/2023/7912017. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1155/2023/7912017
PMID:40224582
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11921830/
Abstract

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is widespread among university students and is associated with high costs for the society. While unguided internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) may have short-term effects in reducing SAD symptoms, evidence for their long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness is still limited. The aim of this study is to examine the 6-month outcomes of an IMI for university students with SAD. Participants were recruited via mass mails sent to enrolled students and included if they were at least 18 years old, met the diagnostic criteria of SAD in a structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders (SCID-I), and provided written informed consent. In a prospective study designed as a two-armed randomized-controlled trial, 200 students (mean age 26.7 years) diagnosed with SAD were randomly assigned to an IMI or a waitlist control (WLC) condition. The IMI consisted of nine weekly sessions based on the cognitive-behavioral treatment model for social phobia by Clark and Wells. The primary outcome was SAD symptom severity assessed via the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS). A health economic evaluation from a societal and healthcare perspective examined the costs related to the symptom-free status and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Statistically significant differences in SAD symptom severity previously found at posttreatment favoring the IMI were maintained at a 6-month follow-up [SIAS (Cohen's = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.30, 0.87) and SPS (Cohen's = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.54, 1.1)]. From a societal perspective, at a willingness to pay (WTP) of €0, the intervention was found to have a 92% and 93% probability of cost-effectiveness compared with the WLC per symptom-free status and QALY gained, respectively. From a healthcare perspective, the likelihood of cost-effectiveness of the intervention was 97% per symptom-free status at a WTP of €1000 (US$1326) and 96% per QALY gained at a WTP of €6000 (US$7956). This IMI is effective in treating university students with SAD and has an acceptable likelihood of cost-effectiveness compared with WLC from a societal perspective. This intervention can be integrated into university healthcare to reach students with SAD as it is scalable, shows a high probability of cost-effectiveness, and overcomes known treatment barriers. This trial is registered with DRKS00011424.

摘要

社交焦虑障碍(SAD)在大学生中普遍存在,且给社会带来高昂成本。虽然基于互联网和移动设备的无指导干预措施(IMIs)可能在减轻社交焦虑障碍症状方面有短期效果,但其长期疗效和成本效益的证据仍然有限。本研究的目的是检验针对患有社交焦虑障碍的大学生进行的IMI干预6个月后的效果。通过向注册学生发送群发邮件招募参与者,纳入标准为年龄至少18岁、在针对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴I障碍的结构化临床访谈(SCID - I)中符合社交焦虑障碍的诊断标准,并提供书面知情同意书。在一项设计为双臂随机对照试验的前瞻性研究中,200名被诊断为社交焦虑障碍的学生(平均年龄26.7岁)被随机分配到IMI组或等待列表对照组(WLC)。IMI由基于Clark和Wells的社交恐惧症认知行为治疗模型的九个每周一次的课程组成。主要结局是通过社交恐惧症量表(SPS)和社交互动焦虑量表(SIAS)评估的社交焦虑障碍症状严重程度。从社会和医疗保健角度进行的健康经济评估考察了与无症状状态相关的成本以及获得的质量调整生命年(QALYs)。先前在治疗后发现有利于IMI组的社交焦虑障碍症状严重程度的统计学显著差异在6个月随访时仍然存在[社交互动焦虑量表(Cohen's = 0.59;95%置信区间,0.30,0.87)和社交恐惧症量表(Cohen's = 0.83;95%置信区间,0.54,1.1)]。从社会角度来看,在支付意愿(WTP)为0欧元时,与WLC组相比,该干预措施分别针对每个无症状状态和获得的QALY具有92%和93%的成本效益概率。从医疗保健角度来看,在支付意愿为1000欧元(1326美元)时,该干预措施针对每个无症状状态的成本效益可能性为97%,在支付意愿为6000欧元(7956美元)时,针对每个获得的QALY的成本效益可能性为96%。这种IMI在治疗患有社交焦虑障碍的大学生方面是有效的,并且从社会角度来看与WLC组相比具有可接受的成本效益可能性。这种干预措施可以整合到大学医疗保健中以惠及患有社交焦虑障碍的学生,因为它具有可扩展性,显示出高成本效益概率,并且克服了已知的治疗障碍。本试验已在DRKS00011424注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/5a4d95e28c43/DA2023-7912017.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/09f29373d92a/DA2023-7912017.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/79c06c1340e6/DA2023-7912017.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/71c7e340f214/DA2023-7912017.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/01a70a5a045a/DA2023-7912017.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/bbf227db69fc/DA2023-7912017.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/27112578e0ad/DA2023-7912017.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/bf9403a8d3fc/DA2023-7912017.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/c45e489d7d3b/DA2023-7912017.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/5a4d95e28c43/DA2023-7912017.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/09f29373d92a/DA2023-7912017.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/79c06c1340e6/DA2023-7912017.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/71c7e340f214/DA2023-7912017.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/01a70a5a045a/DA2023-7912017.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/bbf227db69fc/DA2023-7912017.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/27112578e0ad/DA2023-7912017.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/bf9403a8d3fc/DA2023-7912017.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/c45e489d7d3b/DA2023-7912017.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11921830/5a4d95e28c43/DA2023-7912017.009.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-Term Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of an Internet-Based Self-Help Intervention for Social Anxiety Disorder in University Students: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对大学生社交焦虑障碍的基于互联网自助干预的长期结果与成本效益:一项随机对照试验的结果
Depress Anxiety. 2023 Nov 17;2023:7912017. doi: 10.1155/2023/7912017. eCollection 2023.
2
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an unguided, internet-based self-help intervention for social anxiety disorder in university students: protocol of a randomized controlled trial.一项针对大学生社交焦虑障碍的无指导、基于互联网的自助干预措施的疗效和成本效益的随机对照试验方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2125-4.
3
Efficacy of an unguided internet-based self-help intervention for social anxiety disorder in university students: A randomized controlled trial.一项针对大学生社交焦虑障碍的无指导型基于互联网的自助干预的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Jun;28(2):e1766. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1766. Epub 2019 Jan 27.
4
Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Major Depression and Anxiety Disorders: A Health Technology Assessment.互联网提供的针对重度抑郁症和焦虑症的认知行为疗法:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Feb 19;19(6):1-199. eCollection 2019.
5
Therapist-Guided Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Internet-Delivered Supportive Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.治疗师指导的互联网认知行为疗法与互联网支持性疗法治疗社交焦虑障碍儿童和青少年的随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;78(7):705-713. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0469.
6
Intensive 7-day internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for social anxiety disorder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.针对社交焦虑障碍的为期7天的强化互联网认知行为疗法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2025 Apr 18;26(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08826-6.
7
The Efficacy of Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With a Shame-Specific Intervention for Social Anxiety Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的认知行为疗法结合针对社交焦虑障碍的特定羞耻感干预的疗效:随机对照试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jun 27;11:e50535. doi: 10.2196/50535.
8
Online Social anxiety Cognitive therapy for Adolescents (OSCA): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.在线社交焦虑青少年认知疗法(OSCA):一项随机对照试验的方案。
Trials. 2019 Oct 7;20(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3651-6.
9
Efficacy of an Internet- and Mobile-Based Intervention for Subclinical Anxiety and Depression (ICare Prevent) with Two Guidance Formats: Results from a Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial.基于互联网和移动的亚临床焦虑和抑郁干预的疗效(ICare Prevent),采用两种指导形式:一项三臂随机对照试验的结果。
Psychother Psychosom. 2024;93(3):155-168. doi: 10.1159/000536149. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
10
Cost Utility Analysis of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于互联网的重度抑郁症认知行为疗法的成本效用分析:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 19;27:e67567. doi: 10.2196/67567.

本文引用的文献

1
From fears of evaluation to social anxiety: The longitudinal relationships and neural basis in healthy young adults.从对评价的恐惧到社交焦虑:健康青年成年人中的纵向关系及神经基础
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Apr-Jun;23(2):100345. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100345. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
2
Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice.数字健康干预措施的经济评价:方法学问题及实践建议。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Apr;40(4):367-378. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01130-0. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
3
Some reflections on the use of inappropriate comparators in CEA.
关于成本效益分析中使用不恰当对照的一些思考。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Aug 27;18:29. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00226-8. eCollection 2020.
4
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review.COVID-19 大流行对普通人群心理健康的影响:系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
5
The Use of Evidence-Based Assessment for Anxiety Disorders in an Australian Sample.基于证据的评估在澳大利亚样本中焦虑障碍的应用。
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Oct;75:102279. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102279. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
6
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of a Self-Guided Internet Intervention for Social Anxiety Symptoms in a General Population Sample: Randomized Controlled Trial.针对普通人群样本中社交焦虑症状的自我引导式互联网干预措施的有效性和成本效益:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 10;22(1):e16804. doi: 10.2196/16804.
7
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an unguided, internet-based self-help intervention for social anxiety disorder in university students: protocol of a randomized controlled trial.一项针对大学生社交焦虑障碍的无指导、基于互联网的自助干预措施的疗效和成本效益的随机对照试验方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2125-4.
8
Barriers of mental health treatment utilization among first-year college students: First cross-national results from the WHO World Mental Health International College Student Initiative.大一学生心理健康治疗利用的障碍:来自世卫组织世界心理健康国际大学生倡议的首次跨国研究结果。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Jun;28(2):e1782. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1782. Epub 2019 May 9.
9
Efficacy of an unguided internet-based self-help intervention for social anxiety disorder in university students: A randomized controlled trial.一项针对大学生社交焦虑障碍的无指导型基于互联网的自助干预的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Jun;28(2):e1766. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1766. Epub 2019 Jan 27.
10
WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project: Prevalence and distribution of mental disorders.世界卫生组织世界心理健康调查国际大学生项目:精神障碍的患病率和分布。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Oct;127(7):623-638. doi: 10.1037/abn0000362. Epub 2018 Sep 13.