Ma Dongmei, Li Li, Han Fuyi, Xu Jianhong, Zhang Cheng
Department of Anesthesiology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, Zhejiang, China.
Department of Urology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, Zhejiang, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 28;12:1543866. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1543866. eCollection 2025.
The geriatric population, especially individuals over 65 years old with comorbidities classified by the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grading system, requires careful sedation management during flexible bronchoscopy (FB) to reduce the heightened risks of complications. Hypoxemia is a particularly critical concern in this demographic, leading to considerable morbidity, mortality, and increased healthcare costs. This study focuses on comparing the incidence of sedation-related hypoxemia and other adverse events between remimazolam besylate and propofol during FB procedures, aiming to enhance patient safety and optimize sedation practices in this vulnerable population.
This prospective observational cohort study compared the incidence of hypoxemia and sedation-related adverse events between remimazolam besylate and propofol in 69 elderly patients (ASA I-III). Rigorous inclusion/exclusion criteria, clinical monitoring, and alongside comprehensive monitoring of clinical parameters and statistical analyses to ensure the validity of the results.
Hypoxemia occurred in 44.90% overall, with significantly lower incidence in remimazolam besylate cohort (29.42% vs. 60.00%; OR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.18-3.74, = 0.017). Recovery to full alertness was prolonged with remimazolam (median 15[12.5-20] vs. 8[5.5-10] min; < 0.001). A trend toward reduced hypotension was observed (17.65% vs. 37.14%, = 0.0699), with no other significant safety differences.
Remimazolam besylate demonstrates superior safety for elderly FB sedation, significantly reducing hypoxemia risk and accelerating recovery. These findings support its preferential use in geriatric sedation protocols, warranting further investigation to optimize clinical implementation strategies.
老年人群,尤其是65岁以上患有美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级系统所分类合并症的个体,在进行可弯曲支气管镜检查(FB)时需要谨慎的镇静管理,以降低并发症风险增加的情况。低氧血症在这一人群中是一个特别关键的问题,会导致相当高的发病率、死亡率以及医疗费用增加。本研究聚焦于比较在FB操作过程中,苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚之间镇静相关低氧血症及其他不良事件的发生率,旨在提高这一脆弱人群的患者安全性并优化镇静实践。
这项前瞻性观察性队列研究比较了69例老年患者(ASA I - III级)中苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚的低氧血症发生率及镇静相关不良事件。采用严格的纳入/排除标准、临床监测,并同时全面监测临床参数及进行统计分析以确保结果的有效性。
总体低氧血症发生率为44.90%,苯磺酸瑞马唑仑组的发生率显著更低(29.42%对60.00%;OR = 2.10,95% CI 1.18 - 3.74,P = 0.017)。瑞马唑仑使完全清醒的恢复时间延长(中位数15[12.5 - 20]分钟对8[5.5 - 10]分钟;P < 0.001)。观察到有低血压降低的趋势(17.65%对37.14%,P = 0.0699),无其他显著的安全性差异。
苯磺酸瑞马唑仑在老年FB镇静中显示出卓越的安全性,显著降低低氧血症风险并加速恢复。这些发现支持其在老年镇静方案中的优先使用,值得进一步研究以优化临床实施策略。