Liang Wei-Lin, Wang Rui, He Xin, Liang Bo
Department of Cardiology, Guangyuan Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangyuan, China.
Department of Massage, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
J Orthop. 2025 Mar 20;70:82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.03.030. eCollection 2025 Dec.
Venous thromboembolism poses a significant risk of fatal complications following fracture surgery. Clinical studies indicated that aspirin is prescribed in thromboprophylaxis but the efficacy and safety are not fully certain yet.
A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of aspirin in preventing thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients who have undergone fracture surgery. We searched several databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) up to date January 29, 2023. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Our primary outcomes were all-cause death and bleeding and our secondary outcomes were venous thromboembolism events (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) and surgical site infection. Risk ratios (RR), and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were used as summary statistics.
Two randomized controlled trials (ADAPT and REVENT CLOT) with 12,540 patients were included in our study. All included studies were of high methodological quality. We found nonsignificant trends towards death (RR = 1.07, 95 %CI = 0.71-1.59), bleeding (RR = 0.96, 95 %CI = 0.89-1.05), pulmonary embolism (RR = 0.96, 95 %CI = 0.72-1.27), and surgical site infection (RR = 1.12, 95 %CI = 0.87-1.46) without heterogeneity. Patients receiving aspirin had a higher risk of deep vein thrombosis (RR = 1.48, 95 %CI = 1.16-1.89) without heterogeneity compared to those receiving enoxaparin at 90-day follow-up. Sub-analyses indicated nonsignificant trends towards massive pulmonary embolism (RR = 0.33, 95 %CI = 0.03-3.21), sub-massive pulmonary embolism (RR = 1.47, 95 %CI = 0.76-2.83), and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (RR = 0.90, 95 %CI = 0.64-1.26).
Although aspirin increased the deep venous thrombosis events, the available data showed no significant difference in all-cause mortality, bleeding, pulmonary embolism, and surgical site infection compared with enoxaparin.
静脉血栓栓塞在骨折手术后会带来致命并发症的重大风险。临床研究表明,阿司匹林被用于血栓预防,但疗效和安全性尚未完全确定。
进行一项荟萃分析,以评估阿司匹林在接受骨折手术患者中预防血栓栓塞的安全性和有效性。我们检索了截至2023年1月29日的多个数据库(PubMed、科学网和考克兰图书馆)。仅纳入随机对照试验。我们的主要结局是全因死亡和出血,次要结局是静脉血栓栓塞事件(肺栓塞或深静脉血栓形成)和手术部位感染。风险比(RR)及相应的95%置信区间(CI)用作汇总统计量。
我们的研究纳入了两项随机对照试验(ADAPT和REVENT CLOT),共12540例患者。所有纳入研究的方法学质量都很高。我们发现,在死亡(RR = 1.07,95%CI = 0.71 - 1.59)、出血(RR = 0.96,95%CI = 0.89 - 1.05)、肺栓塞(RR = 0.96,95%CI = 0.72 - 1.27)和手术部位感染(RR = 1.12,95%CI = 0.87 - 1.46)方面存在无统计学意义的趋势,且无异质性。在90天随访时,与接受依诺肝素的患者相比,接受阿司匹林的患者发生深静脉血栓形成的风险更高(RR = 1.48,95%CI = 1.16 - 1.89),且无异质性。亚组分析表明,在大面积肺栓塞(RR = 0.33,95%CI = 0.03 - 3.21)、次大面积肺栓塞(RR = 1.47,95%CI = 0.76 - 2.83)和有症状肺栓塞(RR = 0.90,95%CI = 0.64 - 1.26)方面存在无统计学意义的趋势。
尽管阿司匹林增加了深静脉血栓形成事件,但现有数据表明,与依诺肝素相比,在全因死亡率、出血、肺栓塞和手术部位感染方面无显著差异。