• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较三种手术干预治疗小儿柔韧性扁平足疗效的回顾性队列研究。

A retrospective cohort study comparing the therapeutic efficacy of three surgical interventions for pediatric flexible flatfoot.

作者信息

Hu Xiongke, Zhu Guanghui, Liu Kun, Mei Haibo, Tan Qian

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Xiangya Medical College of Central South University (Hunan Children's Hospital), Changsha, China.

出版信息

Transl Pediatr. 2025 Mar 31;14(3):422-431. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-610. Epub 2025 Mar 26.

DOI:10.21037/tp-23-610
PMID:40225073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11983004/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study evaluated clinical and radiological outcomes of three surgeries for children's flexible flatfeet. A consensus on the most effective surgical approach is lacking, but it's crucial for improving affected children's function and quality of life.

METHODS

From June 2013 to August 2019, a total of 31 children (49 feet) with flexible flatfoot were treated. Consecutive patients aged 6-18 years with symptomatic flexible flatfoot (failure of ≥6-month conservative therapy) were included. Exclusion criteria included neuromuscular disorders or prior foot surgery. Surgical allocation was based on surgeon expertise and anatomical severity: subtalar extra-articular screw arthroereisis (SESA) group (10 feet), HyProCure implantation at tarsal sinus (HyProCure group) (21 feet), calcaneo-cuboid-cuneiform (Triple C) osteotomy group (18 feet). The general data, preoperative imaging data, postoperative imaging data, and final follow-up imaging data were recorded. Baseline characteristics were comparable across the three groups, including age, sex, and preoperative American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified AOFAS. A total of six parameters on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral X-rays of the foot in weight loading were measured and compared.

RESULTS

The operative time and intraoperative blood loss in the SESA group and HyProCure group were significantly lower than those in the Triple C osteotomy group (P<0.05). However, the duration of correcting flatfoot in the Triple C osteotomy group was better than that in the other two groups (P<0.05). The postoperative follow-up lasted for at least 32 months, with an average of 41 months. The AOFAS scores of all three groups showed significant improvement compared to preoperative scores (P<0.05). As for postoperative imaging measurement indexes among all three groups, AP talo-first metatarsal angle, lateral talo-first metatarsal angle, AP talocalcaneal angle, Talonavicular coverage angle, and calcaneal pitch angle had significantly improved from preoperatively measured values (P<0.05). There was no significant difference observed between clinical outcomes or imaging measurement indexes among these three groups. The incidence rate of tarsal sinus pain was 10% in the SESA group while 14.3% was observed in the HyProCure group; no patient underwent removal of internal fixation due to obvious pain symptoms. In the SESA group, 10% incidence rate was observed for fibular muscle contracture while 16.7% incidence rate was seen for wound pain after the Triple C osteotomy procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the other two groups, the Triple C osteotomy group corrects flatfoot deformities quicker but has a longer surgery and more bleeding. SESA, HyProCure implantation at tarsal sinus, and Triple C osteotomy achieve satisfactory results for symptomatic flexible flatfeet. But due to the study's retrospective nature, more randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV retrospective study.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8de/11983004/346bed3f7cad/tp-14-03-422-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8de/11983004/aff0494eaef6/tp-14-03-422-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8de/11983004/346bed3f7cad/tp-14-03-422-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8de/11983004/aff0494eaef6/tp-14-03-422-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8de/11983004/346bed3f7cad/tp-14-03-422-f2.jpg
摘要

背景

这项回顾性研究评估了三种治疗儿童柔性扁平足手术的临床和影像学结果。目前对于最有效的手术方法尚无共识,但这对于改善患病儿童的功能和生活质量至关重要。

方法

2013年6月至2019年8月,共治疗31例(49足)柔性扁平足儿童。纳入6至18岁有症状的柔性扁平足(保守治疗≥6个月失败)的连续患者。排除标准包括神经肌肉疾病或既往足部手术史。手术分配基于外科医生的专业技能和解剖严重程度:距下关节外螺钉关节制动术(SESA)组(10足)、跗窦HyProCure植入术(HyProCure组)(21足)、跟骰楔骨(Triple C)截骨术组(18足)。记录一般资料、术前影像学资料、术后影像学资料及末次随访影像学资料。三组的基线特征具有可比性,包括年龄、性别和术前美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)评分。采用改良AOFAS评估临床结果。在负重位足部前后位(AP)和侧位X线片上共测量6个参数并进行比较。

结果

SESA组和HyProCure组的手术时间和术中出血量显著低于Triple C截骨术组(P<0.05)。然而,Triple C截骨术组矫正扁平足的持续时间优于其他两组(P<0.05)。术后随访至少32个月,平均41个月。三组的AOFAS评分与术前评分相比均有显著改善(P<0.05)。三组术后影像学测量指标中,AP距骨-第一跖骨角、外侧距骨-第一跖骨角、AP距跟角、距舟覆盖角和跟骨倾斜角较术前测量值均有显著改善(P<0.05)。三组之间的临床结果或影像学测量指标未见显著差异。SESA组跗窦疼痛发生率为10%,HyProCure组为14.3%;无患者因明显疼痛症状而取出内固定物。SESA组腓骨肌挛缩发生率为10%,Triple C截骨术后伤口疼痛发生率为16.7%。

结论

与其他两组相比,Triple C截骨术组矫正扁平足畸形更快,但手术时间更长,出血更多。SESA、跗窦HyProCure植入术和Triple C截骨术治疗有症状的柔性扁平足均取得了满意的效果。但由于本研究为回顾性性质,需要更多随机对照试验来证实这些发现。

证据水平

IV级回顾性研究。

相似文献

1
A retrospective cohort study comparing the therapeutic efficacy of three surgical interventions for pediatric flexible flatfoot.一项比较三种手术干预治疗小儿柔韧性扁平足疗效的回顾性队列研究。
Transl Pediatr. 2025 Mar 31;14(3):422-431. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-610. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
[SHORT-TERM EFFECTIVENESS OF Hyprocure SUBTALAR STABILIZATION IN TREATMENT OF ADOLESCENT FLEXIBLE FLATFOOT].[Hyprocure距下关节稳定术治疗青少年柔韧性扁平足的短期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Aug 8;30(8):975-979. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160198.
3
Mid-term Results of Subtalar Arthroereisis with Talar-Fit Implant in Pediatric Flexible Flatfoot and Identifying the Effects of Adjunctive Procedures and Risk Factors for Sinus Tarsi Pain.距下关节融合术联合 Talar-Fit 植入物治疗儿童柔韧性平足症的中期疗效及附加手术的影响和跗骨窦疼痛的危险因素分析。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Feb;13(1):175-184. doi: 10.1111/os.12864. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Comparison of the calcaneo-cuboid-cuneiform osteotomies and the calcaneal lengthening osteotomy in the surgical treatment of symptomatic flexible flatfoot.跟骰-楔骨截骨术与跟骨延长截骨术治疗症状性柔性扁平足的比较
J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Dec;32(8):821-9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182648c74.
5
[Effectiveness of spring ligament repair in treatment of children's flexible flatfoot].[弹簧韧带修复治疗儿童柔韧性扁平足的疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Apr 15;39(4):406-411. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202502020.
6
Calcaneal Z Lengthening Osteotomy Combined With Subtalar Arthroereisis for Severe Adolescent Flexible Flatfoot Reconstruction.跟骨Z形延长截骨术联合距下关节制动术治疗青少年重度柔韧性扁平足重建
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Nov;37(11):1225-1231. doi: 10.1177/1071100716658975. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
7
Therapeutic Outcomes of Kalix II in Treating Juvenile Flexible Flatfoot.卡利克斯II治疗青少年柔性扁平足的疗效
Orthop Surg. 2017 Feb;9(1):20-27. doi: 10.1111/os.12309.
8
Subtalar Arthroereisis for Symptomatic Flexible Flatfoot in Adolescents: A Prospective Study of 26 Feet.青少年症状性柔韧性扁平足的距下关节制动术:26例足部的前瞻性研究
Mater Sociomed. 2024;36(2):131-136. doi: 10.5455/msm.2024.36.131-136.
9
HyProCure for Pediatric Flexible Flatfoot: What Affects the Outcome.用于儿童柔性扁平足的HyProCure:哪些因素会影响治疗结果。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Apr 14;10:857458. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.857458. eCollection 2022.
10
[Comparison of the effectiveness of two kinds of surgeries for treatment of flexible flatfoot combined with painful accessory navicular bone in children].[两种手术治疗儿童柔韧性扁平足合并疼痛性副舟骨的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Oct 15;37(10):1225-1229. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202307024.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of Functional Re-Education as a Treatment for Infantile Flexible Flatfoot: Systematic Review.功能再教育作为小儿柔韧性扁平足治疗方法的疗效:系统评价
Children (Basel). 2024 Dec 24;12(1):8. doi: 10.3390/children12010008.
2
Arthroereisis with a Talar Screw in Symptomatic Flexible Flatfoot in Children.儿童症状性柔韧性扁平足的距骨螺钉关节制动术
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 2;12(23):7475. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237475.
3
Does Kinesio taping of tibialis posterior or peroneus longus have an immediate effect on improving foot posture, dynamic balance, and biomechanical variables in young women with flexible flatfoot?
肌内效贴扎胫骨后肌或腓骨长肌对改善年轻女性柔韧性扁平足的足弓形态、动态平衡和生物力学变量有即刻影响吗?
Foot (Edinb). 2023 Sep;56:102032. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2023.102032. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
4
Risk Factors of Flatfoot in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.儿童扁平足的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 6;19(14):8247. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148247.
5
Increased toe flexor strength does not relate to altered postural sway during static upright standing after 12 weeks of multicomponent exercise training.经过12周的多组分运动训练后,在静态直立站立时,趾屈肌力量增强与姿势摇摆改变无关。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Apr;23(4):520-529. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2050950. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
6
Arthroereisis in juvenile flexible flatfoot: Which device should we implant? A systematic review of literature published in the last 5 years.青少年柔性扁平足的关节制动术:我们应该植入哪种装置?对过去5年发表的文献的系统评价
World J Orthop. 2021 Jun 18;12(6):433-444. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i6.433.
7
Functional and Radiological Outcomes Following Calcaneo-Cuboid-Cuneiform Osteotomy for the Treatment of Planovalgus Feet: A Short-Term Analysis.跟骰-楔骨截骨术治疗扁平外翻足的功能和影像学结果:短期分析
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Jul 15;55(Suppl 1):119-127. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00195-3. eCollection 2021 May.
8
Results of the Italian Pediatric Orthopedics Society juvenile flexible flatfoot survey: diagnosis and treatment options.意大利小儿矫形外科学会青少年柔韧性平足症调查结果:诊断和治疗选择。
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):e17-e23. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000881.
9
Subtalar Arthroereisis for Flexible Flatfoot in Children-Clinical, Radiographic and Pedobarographic Outcome Comparing Three Different Methods.儿童柔韧性扁平足的距下关节制动术——比较三种不同方法的临床、影像学和足底压力测量结果
Children (Basel). 2021 Apr 30;8(5):359. doi: 10.3390/children8050359.
10
Trends in hospitalisation of Subtalar Joint Arthroereisis in Italy from 2009 to 2016.2009年至2016年意大利距下关节制动术的住院治疗趋势。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Feb;28(2):258-262. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 Apr 5.