Mohammadzadeh Maryam, Erfanian Reza, Khoozani Abolfazl Shiravi, Abdullah Hakima, Anari Mahtab Rabbani, Ardehali Mojtaba Mohammadi, Zarch Varasteh Vakili
Department of Radiology, Amir Alam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Otolaryngology Research Center, Amir Alam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Apr;77(4):1813-1817. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05410-x. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
Applying cold is a common method for epistaxis management. In this study, the effect of cold on the blood flow of the internal and external carotid system was examined, with the help of ultrasonography, to get a more accurate picture of the effect of cold on blood flow to the head and neck. This study consisted of three separate phases conducted on healthy adult volunteers. Phase 1: Cervical skin and tympanic temperatures, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), and heart rate (HR) were measured at baseline and every 5 min for 25 min, with an ice collar in place and after removal. Phase 2: Blood flow of the Internal carotid artery (ICA), External carotid artery (ECA), Facial Artery (FA), and Temporalis Artery (TA) were assessed before applying a regular cervical collar, and promptly after removing it, using Doppler ultrasound. FA and TA blood flows were also measured 5 and 15 min after collar application. Phase 3: The second phase was repeated, this time using an ice collar. Blood flows were additionally assessed 10 min after collar removal. Cold application was associated with tympanic and cervical skin temperatures (P-values: 0.002, < 0.0001), while it had no association with HR, SBP, or DBP (P-values: 0.16, 0.51, 0.36). Applying a regular collar did not affect ICA, ECA, FA, and TA blood flow (P-values:0.9,0.1,0.5,0.06). Pearson's correlation coefficients for flow assessment of ICA, ECA, FA, and TA by Doppler ultrasound before collar use and after its removal were 0.73, 0.96, 0.76, and 0.90, respectively (P-values: 0.01, < 0.001, 0.02, < 0.0001). The cold application did not alter ICA blood flow (P-value: 0.1) but decreased ECA, FA, and TA blood flows (P-values: 0.0002, < 0.0001, < 0.0001). Cold application on the neck can significantly decrease ECA, FA, and TA blood flows, while ICA blood flow remains unchanged. These findings indicate a differing effect of cold on the neck in epistaxis management within the internal carotid system, compared to the external carotid system.
冷敷是鼻出血处理的常用方法。在本研究中,借助超声检查来探究冷敷对内、外颈动脉系统血流的影响,以便更准确地了解冷敷对头部和颈部血流的作用。本研究由针对健康成年志愿者开展的三个独立阶段组成。阶段1:在佩戴冰领时以及取下冰领后,于基线水平及之后的25分钟内每隔5分钟测量一次颈部皮肤温度、鼓膜温度、收缩压和舒张压(SBP和DBP)以及心率(HR)。阶段2:在佩戴普通颈圈之前、取下颈圈后即刻,使用多普勒超声评估颈内动脉(ICA)、颈外动脉(ECA)、面动脉(FA)和颞浅动脉(TA)的血流情况。在佩戴颈圈5分钟和15分钟后也测量FA和TA的血流。阶段3:重复第二阶段,此次使用冰领。在取下颈圈10分钟后额外评估血流情况。冷敷与鼓膜温度和颈部皮肤温度相关(P值分别为0.002、<0.0001),而与HR、SBP或DBP无关(P值分别为0.16、0.51、0.36)。佩戴普通颈圈对ICA、ECA、FA和TA的血流无影响(P值分别为0.9、0.1、0.5、0.06)。在使用颈圈之前和取下颈圈后,通过多普勒超声评估ICA、ECA、FA和TA血流的Pearson相关系数分别为0.73、0.96、0.76和0.90(P值分别为0.01、<0.001、0.02、<0.0001)。冷敷并未改变ICA血流(P值为0.1),但降低了ECA、FA和TA的血流(P值分别为0.0002、<0.0001、<0.0001)。颈部冷敷可显著降低ECA、FA和TA的血流,而ICA血流保持不变。这些发现表明,在鼻出血处理中,与颈外动脉系统相比,冷敷对颈内动脉系统颈部的影响有所不同。