Beshir M, Wang Y, Cicione A, Hadden R, Krajcovic M, Rush D
Center for Fire Safety Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JL UK.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 Canada.
Fire Technol. 2025;61(3):1409-1430. doi: 10.1007/s10694-023-01517-1. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
Three full-scale experimental compartment fires are compared to investigate the effect of the fuel location and the ventilation factor on under ventilated thermally thin bounded ISO-9705 compartments. Wood cribs were used as the fuel load and the crib placement was varied between two locations (back and middle) to study the effect of the fuel location. Furthermore, the ventilation conditions were changed from a door and window (i.e., ventilation factor of 2.58 m) to only a door (i.e., ventilation factor of 2.26 m) for the scenario where the cribs were placed at the back of the compartment. The novelty of this work lies in its examination of the time to flashover, gas layer temperature, heat release rate, and external radiative heat fluxes, specifically considering the impact of fuel location and ventilation factor. It was observed that placing the fuel package in the middle of the compartment led to a longer growth phase, hotter gas layer temperature, a higher Heat Release Rate (HRR) needed for flashover ( ), and higher external radiative heat fluxes through openings. It was also found that, decreasing the ventilation factor decreased the heat losses and therefore the . Decreased ventilation also affected the height of the neutral plane, as one would expect, and the shape of the external plume, but did not have significant effect on the temperature within the compartment, the walls of the compartment, and the external radiative heat flux.
对三场全尺寸实验舱室火灾进行比较,以研究燃料位置和通风系数对通风不足的热薄边界ISO - 9705舱室的影响。使用木垛作为燃料负载,并将木垛放置位置在两个位置(后部和中部)之间变化,以研究燃料位置的影响。此外,对于木垛放置在舱室后部的情况,通风条件从一扇门和一扇窗(即通风系数为2.58米)改变为仅一扇门(即通风系数为2.26米)。这项工作的新颖之处在于其对轰燃时间、气层温度、热释放速率和外部辐射热通量的研究,特别考虑了燃料位置和通风系数的影响。观察到将燃料包放置在舱室中部会导致更长的增长阶段、更高的气层温度、轰燃所需的更高热释放速率( )以及通过开口的更高外部辐射热通量。还发现,降低通风系数会减少热损失,因此 。正如预期的那样,通风减少也影响了中性平面的高度和外部羽流的形状,但对舱室内温度、舱室壁和外部辐射热通量没有显著影响。