• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吻合器平台会影响机器人袖状胃切除术的术后结果吗?

Does Stapling Platform Influence Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy Postoperative Outcomes?

作者信息

Ying Lee, Rutledge Rachael, Butensky Samuel, Lugo Daniel Farinas, Morton John, Ringold Forrest

机构信息

Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, USA.

Mobile Infirmary, Mobile, USA.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2025 May;35(5):1838-1844. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07855-z. Epub 2025 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07855-z
PMID:40227538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12065732/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) accounts for the majority of weight loss surgeries worldwide. Although the overall side effect profile is low, the rate of de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) ranges between 2.1 and 49%. Our study compares postoperative outcomes using a single-fire stapler versus a multiple-fire linear stapler, with a focus on postoperative de novo GERD.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-surgeon study with data from 257 patients who underwent consecutive robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy between 2016 and 2023 with either multiple fires of a linear stapler (n = 201) or a single-fire linear stapler (n = 56). Patient demographics and postoperative outcomes, including 30-day complications, 1-year weight loss, and 1-year postoperative reflux, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients in the single-fire group were noted to have a significantly lower rate of postoperative reflux (7.1% vs. 26.4%) and a decreased incidence of de novo reflux (1.8% vs. 10.9%). Additionally, the single-fire group had a shorter average length of stay (2.0 days vs. 2.2 days, p = 0.04). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that single-fire stapler use increased the likelihood of not developing postoperative GERD (odds ratio: 8.4, 95% confidence interval: 2.8-32.5). There was no significant difference in operative time (multiple-fire group: 81.4 min, single-fire group: 90.1 min, p = 0.5) or 1-year percent total weight loss (multiple-fire: 22.4% ± 0.7%, single-fire: 22.0% ± 1.7%, p = 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-fire stapler use may enhance postoperative outcomes in LSG by reducing rates of de novo GERD without impacting weight loss. There was no significant difference in operative time, and postoperative length of stay may be decreased.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)在全球减肥手术中占大多数。尽管总体副作用发生率较低,但新发胃食管反流病(GERD)的发生率在2.1%至49%之间。我们的研究比较了使用单次击发吻合器与多次击发直线吻合器的术后结果,重点关注术后新发GERD。

方法

这是一项单术者的回顾性研究,数据来自2016年至2023年间连续接受机器人辅助袖状胃切除术的257例患者,其中使用多次击发直线吻合器的有201例,使用单次击发直线吻合器的有56例。分析了患者的人口统计学数据和术后结果,包括30天并发症、1年体重减轻情况以及术后1年的反流情况。

结果

单次击发组的术后反流率显著较低(7.1%对26.4%),新发反流的发生率也有所降低(1.8%对10.9%)。此外,单次击发组的平均住院时间较短(2.0天对2.2天,p = 0.04)。多变量分析表明,使用单次击发吻合器增加了不发生术后GERD的可能性(优势比:8.4,95%置信区间:2.8 - 32.5)。手术时间无显著差异(多次击发组:81.4分钟,单次击发组:90.1分钟,p = 0.5),1年总体重减轻百分比也无显著差异(多次击发组:22.4%±0.7%,单次击发组:22.0%±1.7%,p = 0.8)。

结论

使用单次击发吻合器可能通过降低新发GERD的发生率来改善LSG的术后结果,且不影响体重减轻。手术时间无显著差异,术后住院时间可能会缩短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c35b/12065732/7c5a0af32d51/11695_2025_7855_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c35b/12065732/ecd5871e4de9/11695_2025_7855_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c35b/12065732/7c5a0af32d51/11695_2025_7855_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c35b/12065732/ecd5871e4de9/11695_2025_7855_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c35b/12065732/7c5a0af32d51/11695_2025_7855_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Does Stapling Platform Influence Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy Postoperative Outcomes?吻合器平台会影响机器人袖状胃切除术的术后结果吗?
Obes Surg. 2025 May;35(5):1838-1844. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07855-z. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
2
Perioperative Outcomes Using Single-Fire Stapler.使用单次击发吻合器的围手术期结果。
Obes Surg. 2024 Sep;34(9):3553-3560. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07357-4. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
3
Thirty day outcomes for laparoscopic versus robotic sleeve gastrectomy: Does the stapler matter?腹腔镜与机器人袖状胃切除术的 30 天结果:吻合器重要吗?
Am J Surg. 2024 Nov;237:115801. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115801. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
4
Gastroesophageal reflux related changes after sleeve gastrectomy and sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication: A retrospective single center study.胃食管反流相关变化在袖状胃切除术和胃底折叠术袖状胃切除术后:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 18;13:1041889. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1041889. eCollection 2022.
5
The Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with Concomitant Hiatal Hernia Repair on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in the Morbidly Obese.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术联合食管裂孔疝修补术对病态肥胖患者胃食管反流病的影响
Obes Surg. 2016 Jan;26(1):61-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1737-0.
6
Outcomes of Concomitant Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Hiatal Hernia Repair on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients with Severe Obesity: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.同期腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与食管裂孔疝修补术治疗重度肥胖患者胃食管反流病的疗效:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Obes Surg. 2025 May;35(5):1685-1692. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07815-7. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
7
Moderating the Enthusiasm of Sleeve Gastrectomy: Up to Fifty Percent of Reflux Symptoms After Ten Years in a Consecutive Series of One Hundred Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomies.适度降低袖状胃切除术的热情:在连续100例腹腔镜袖状胃切除术病例系列中,术后十年出现反流症状的比例高达50%。
Obes Surg. 2017 Jul;27(7):1797-1803. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2567-z.
8
Correlation Between Symptomatic Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Erosive Esophagitis (EE) Post-vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (VSG).胃食管反流病(GERD)症状与垂直袖状胃切除术(VSG)后糜烂性食管炎(EE)的相关性。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jan;29(1):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3509-0.
9
De novo gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy: role of preoperative silent reflux.袖状胃切除术后新发胃食管反流病:术前无症状反流的作用。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):789-793. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6344-4. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
10
Prevalence and Predictors of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后胃食管反流病的患病率及预测因素
Obes Surg. 2018 Apr;28(4):916-922. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2971-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Perioperative Outcomes Using Single-Fire Stapler.使用单次击发吻合器的围手术期结果。
Obes Surg. 2024 Sep;34(9):3553-3560. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07357-4. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
2
Proton Pump Inhibitors: Rational Use and Use-Reduction - The Windsor Workshop.质子泵抑制剂:合理使用与减少使用——温莎研讨会。
Dig Dis. 2024;42(3):211-220. doi: 10.1159/000538399. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
3
Multisite study of Titan SGS stapler in longitudinal gastric resection.多中心研究纵向胃切除术中使用 Titan SGS 吻合器。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):6285-6292. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09051-x. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
4
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Bariatric Surgery Readmissions: Findings From 130,007 Admissions in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program.减重手术再入院的患病率及危险因素:来自代谢与减重手术认证及质量改进项目130,007例入院病例的研究结果
Ann Surg. 2018 Jan;267(1):122-131. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002079.
5
Impact of obesity treatment on gastroesophageal reflux disease.肥胖治疗对胃食管反流病的影响。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 28;22(4):1627-38. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i4.1627.
6
Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013.《2013年全球减肥手术》
Obes Surg. 2015 Oct;25(10):1822-32. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1657-z.
7
Association of radiographic morphology with early gastroesophageal reflux disease and satiety control after sleeve gastrectomy.影像学形态与袖状胃切除术后早期胃食管反流病及饱腹感控制的相关性
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Sep;219(3):430-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.036. Epub 2014 May 9.
8
Sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux disease.袖状胃切除术与胃食管反流病
J Obes. 2013;2013:741097. doi: 10.1155/2013/741097. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
9
Limited ability of the proton-pump inhibitor test to identify patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.质子泵抑制剂试验识别胃食管反流病患者的能力有限。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Dec;10(12):1360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.06.030. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
10
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--volume and pressure assessment.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术——容积与压力评估
Obes Surg. 2008 Sep;18(9):1083-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9576-x. Epub 2008 Jun 6.