• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用单次击发吻合器的围手术期结果。

Perioperative Outcomes Using Single-Fire Stapler.

机构信息

Corewell Health Department of General Surgery, 1900 Wealthy St SE, Suite 250, Grand Rapids, MI, 49506, USA.

Corewell Health - Grand Rapids/Michigan State University General Surgery Residency, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, USA.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2024 Sep;34(9):3553-3560. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07357-4. Epub 2024 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-024-07357-4
PMID:39106032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11349793/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common bariatric surgery performed worldwide. The Titan stapler aims to standardize the sleeve gastrectomy by eliminating inconsistencies and simplifying the procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients > 18 years of age undergoing LSG using the Titan. Pre-operative demographics, perioperative findings, and post-operative complications were all abstracted from the MBSAQIP database.

RESULTS

A total of 807 LSG have been performed using the latest iteration of the Titan stapler since November 2022. Data from these patients was compared to 3829 patients who underwent LSG using a sequential staple firing technique from September 2016-September 2021. The median age of Titan patients was 42 years (IQR 33-52) compared to 44 years (IQR 35-54) for sequential firing. The median pre-operative BMI was 47.1 (IQR 43.5-52.1) for Titan versus 47.6 (IQR 43.1-53.3) for sequential staple firing. After propensity matching, operative duration was significantly less for the Titan. Titan patients had decreased hospital length of stay, experienced fewer 30-day readmissions, and had less post-operative nausea/vomiting. Post-op bleed rates were similar between the two cohorts. Weight loss at 6 months favored the sequential fire arm, but our preliminary data shows this difference diminishes at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Here we report our data on patients undergoing LSG using the latest Titan stapler. We show the device is safe, effective, and has resulted in an improvement in length of stay, readmissions, and post-operative nausea/vomiting. We also noted reduced operative time with this technique.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)是目前全球应用最广泛的减重手术。Titan 吻合器旨在通过消除差异和简化手术过程来标准化袖状胃切除术。

方法

对 2022 年 11 月以来使用 Titan 吻合器进行 LSG 的所有年龄大于 18 岁的患者进行回顾性图表审查。从 MBSAQIP 数据库中提取术前人口统计学、围手术期发现和术后并发症的所有数据。

结果

自 2022 年 11 月以来,使用最新迭代的 Titan 吻合器共进行了 807 例 LSG。将这些患者的数据与 2016 年 9 月至 2021 年 9 月期间使用连续吻合器吻合技术进行 LSG 的 3829 例患者的数据进行比较。Titan 患者的中位年龄为 42 岁(IQR 33-52),而连续吻合器吻合的患者为 44 岁(IQR 35-54)。Titan 的中位术前 BMI 为 47.1(IQR 43.5-52.1),而连续吻合器吻合的患者为 47.6(IQR 43.1-53.3)。在倾向评分匹配后,Titan 的手术时间明显减少。Titan 患者的住院时间缩短,30 天再入院率降低,术后恶心/呕吐发生率降低。两组术后出血率相似。6 个月时的体重减轻有利于连续吻合器吻合,但我们的初步数据显示,这一差异在 1 年后会减小。

结论

我们在此报告使用最新 Titan 吻合器进行 LSG 的患者数据。我们证明该设备安全、有效,并且缩短了住院时间、减少了再入院率和术后恶心/呕吐。我们还注意到这种技术的手术时间缩短。

相似文献

1
Perioperative Outcomes Using Single-Fire Stapler.使用单次击发吻合器的围手术期结果。
Obes Surg. 2024 Sep;34(9):3553-3560. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07357-4. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
2
Evaluation of Alternate Laparoscopic Stapling Device for Bariatric Surgery.减重手术中替代腹腔镜吻合器的评估。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023 Oct 1;33(5):505-510. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001204.
3
A superior approach? The role of robotic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with super super obesity using the 2019-2022 MBSAQIP database.一种更优越的方法?利用 2019-2022 年 MBSAQIP 数据库评估机器人袖状胃切除术在超级肥胖患者中的作用。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4594-4603. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10955-z. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
4
Thirty day outcomes for laparoscopic versus robotic sleeve gastrectomy: Does the stapler matter?腹腔镜与机器人袖状胃切除术的 30 天结果:吻合器重要吗?
Am J Surg. 2024 Nov;237:115801. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115801. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
5
Current role of staple line reinforcement in 30-day outcomes of primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of MBSAQIP data, 2015-2016 PUF.2015-2016 年 MBSAQIP 数据 PUF 分析:缝线加固在原发性腹腔镜袖状胃切除术 30 天结果中的当前作用。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1454-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.024. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
6
Is staple line oversewing in patients on chronic anticoagulation during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy necessary? Propensity score matching analysis using the 2015-2018 MBSAQIP.在接受慢性抗凝治疗的患者中,腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中是否需要缝扎吻合口?利用 2015-2018 年 MBSAQIP 的倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8481-8489. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09146-5. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
7
Weight-loss outcomes of SPIDER(®) sleeve gastrectomy at 6 months compared to traditional laparoscopic technique.与传统腹腔镜技术相比,SPIDER(®)袖状胃切除术6个月时的减重效果。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):2043-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4451-z. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
8
Multisite study of Titan SGS stapler in longitudinal gastric resection.多中心研究纵向胃切除术中使用 Titan SGS 吻合器。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):6285-6292. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09051-x. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
9
Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Super-obese.肥胖患者行机器人与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的围手术期结局。
J Surg Res. 2020 May;249:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
10
The impact of nausea on post-operative outcomes in bariatric surgery patients.肥胖症患者术后恶心对术后结果的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3085-3091. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07058-5. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Are We Adopting New Technologies in MBS to Serve the Patients or Because They Fascinate the Surgeon?我们在微创心脏手术中采用新技术是为了服务患者,还是因为它们让外科医生着迷?
Obes Surg. 2025 Jun;35(6):2030-2034. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07923-4. Epub 2025 May 13.
2
Obesity Surgery Response to Letter to the Editor.肥胖症手术对致编辑信的回应。
Obes Surg. 2025 Jun;35(6):2399. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07718-7. Epub 2025 May 4.
3
Does Stapling Platform Influence Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy Postoperative Outcomes?吻合器平台会影响机器人袖状胃切除术的术后结果吗?
Obes Surg. 2025 May;35(5):1838-1844. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07855-z. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
4
Raising Concerns About Perioperative Outcomes Using Single-Fire Stapler During Sleeve Gastrectomies.对袖状胃切除术中使用单钉仓吻合器的围手术期结果提出担忧。
Obes Surg. 2025 Jan;35(1):350-351. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07504-x. Epub 2024 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Surprising neutral effect of shorter staple cartridges in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中小口径套管的惊人中性效果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5049-5054. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08865-5. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
2
Association of body mass index with health care expenditures in the United States by age and sex.按年龄和性别划分的美国人体重指数与医疗保健支出的关联。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 24;16(3):e0247307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247307. eCollection 2021.
3
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with Omentopexy: Is It Really a Promising Method?-A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.带网膜固定术的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:它真的是一种有前景的方法吗?——一项Meta分析的系统评价
Obes Surg. 2021 Jun;31(6):2709-2716. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05327-8. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
4
Assessment of a novel stapler performance for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.评估一种新型吻合器在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中的性能。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):4016-4021. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07858-0. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
5
Why We Think Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Is a Good Operation: Step-by-Step Technique.为什么我们认为腹腔镜袖状胃切除术是一种良好的手术:分步技术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Jun;30(6):615-618. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0154. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
6
Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.五种缝钉线加固方案在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中漏率的比较:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):396-407. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06782-2. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
7
Gastric wall thickness and stapling in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy - a literature review.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中胃壁厚度与吻合器应用——文献综述
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Mar;13(1):122-127. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.73362. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
8
Proximal Leakage After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: an Analysis of Preoperative and Operative Predictors on 1738 Consecutive Procedures.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后近端渗漏:对1738例连续手术的术前和术中预测因素分析
Obes Surg. 2018 Mar;28(3):627-635. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2907-z.
9
Evaluating the effect of operative technique on leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case-control study.评估手术技术对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后渗漏的影响:一项病例对照研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Apr;13(4):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.027. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
10
The Impact of Different Surgical Techniques on Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomies: The First Report from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP).不同手术技术对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术结局的影响:来自代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划(MBSAQIP)的首次报告。
Ann Surg. 2016 Sep;264(3):464-73. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001851.