Mohamed K Kasim, Srinivas K Satish, Seenivasan Madhankumar, Babu Annapoorani
Department of Prosthodontics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Radiatian Oncology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2024 Oct 1;24(4):381-386. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_570_23. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
Since the advent of radiotherapy, the success rate of head and neck cancer treatment has increased significantly. However, when the tissue tolerance level is exceeded, unnecessary and uncontrolled exposure to radiation is considered detrimental. Such problems remain difficult to prevent and manage. The aim of the study to evaluate and compare the degree of attenuation of therapeutic radiation using four different radiation shielding materials of varying thickness.
In vitro experimental study.
The samples were divided into four groups based on the different radiation shielding materials of thickness 3mm and 5mm. The materials are Lead (Pb), Silver-tin alloy (Ag-Sn) with Polyvinylsiloxane (PVS), Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) with Barium sulphate (BaSO4), and a combination of Ag-Sn with PVS and PMMA with BaSO4 which was exposed to radiation. The radiation dose measurements were recorded and the radiation attenuation properties of the shielding materials were evaluated. Among all of the shielding materials the most efficient material under consideration is determined.
One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc test was used to compare the means of all four groups.
A statistically significant difference between groups was found by a one-way ANOVA with a P = 0.001. In the post hoc test, statistically significant findings were obtained with a P = 0.05 when comparing the variation values of 3mm and 5mm thickness between each group and other groups.
The shielding materials results in significant reductions in radiation dosage. It was concluded that the combinations of Ag-Sn alloy with PVS, and PMMA with BaSO4 of thickness 5 mm had a good shielding effect.
自放射治疗问世以来,头颈癌治疗成功率显著提高。然而,当超过组织耐受水平时,不必要且无控制的辐射暴露被认为是有害的。此类问题仍难以预防和管理。本研究旨在评估和比较使用四种不同厚度的辐射屏蔽材料时治疗性辐射的衰减程度。
体外实验研究。
根据厚度为3毫米和5毫米的不同辐射屏蔽材料将样本分为四组。材料分别为铅(Pb)、含聚乙烯基硅氧烷(PVS)的银锡合金(Ag - Sn)、含硫酸钡(BaSO4)的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA),以及暴露于辐射下的Ag - Sn与PVS和PMMA与BaSO4的组合。记录辐射剂量测量值并评估屏蔽材料的辐射衰减特性。在所有屏蔽材料中确定最有效的材料。
采用单因素方差分析(One - way ANOVA)及事后检验来比较所有四组的均值。
单因素方差分析发现组间存在统计学显著差异,P = 0.001。在事后检验中,当比较每组3毫米和5毫米厚度与其他组的变化值时,P = 0.05时获得统计学显著结果。
屏蔽材料可显著降低辐射剂量。得出结论,厚度为5毫米的Ag - Sn合金与PVS以及PMMA与BaSO4的组合具有良好的屏蔽效果。