Suppr超能文献

一种用于毒理学途径及相关新方法学人体相关性评估的实用工作流程。

A pragmatic workflow for human relevance assessment of toxicological pathways and associated new approach methodologies.

作者信息

Veltman Christina H J, van der Ven Leo T M, Menegola Elena, Luijten Mirjam

机构信息

Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2025 Aug;160:105828. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105828. Epub 2025 Apr 12.

Abstract

Currently, safety assessments of chemical substances are predominantly based on animal data. Multiple considerations call for the use of alternative testing strategies that are based on new approach methodologies (NAMs). However, the human relevance of these testing strategies is usually uncertain. This necessitates a harmonized and accepted workflow for assessing their applicability for regulatory purposes. This report proposes such a workflow, applicable for assessing the human relevance of a toxicological pathway and the relevance of NAMs related to the different components of the pathway. The workflow starts with an established toxicological pathway, of which the adverse outcome is relevant for human health risk assessment and that has sufficient weight of evidence. Human relevance is assessed through three main questions, related to the different components (steps) of the pathway, the pathology of human syndromes that have a similar adverse outcome, and quantitative aspects. The latter comprise both interspecies differences and in vitro - in vivo differences. The combined evidence is scored as 'strong', 'moderate' or 'weak' support of human relevance, based on expert judgement. The workflow developed was tested in a case study, through application to an AOP describing craniofacial malformations after in utero exposure to triazoles. Based on evidence collected for two of the three main questions, the case study provided moderate to strong support for human relevance of both the various components of the AOP and its associated NAMs. Furthermore, it demonstrated that the workflow is a promising approach that allows for a more transparent scientific evaluation of human relevance of toxicological pathways and associated NAMs. Therefore, despite some areas for improvement, we consider the workflow an important step forward for application of AOPs and related NAMs in human health risk assessment.

摘要

目前,化学物质的安全性评估主要基于动物数据。多种因素促使人们采用基于新方法学(NAMs)的替代测试策略。然而,这些测试策略与人类的相关性通常并不明确。这就需要一个统一且被认可的工作流程,以评估它们在监管目的方面的适用性。本报告提出了这样一个工作流程,适用于评估毒理学途径与人类的相关性以及与该途径不同组成部分相关的新方法学的相关性。该工作流程始于一个既定的毒理学途径,其不良后果与人类健康风险评估相关且有足够的证据权重。通过三个主要问题评估与人类的相关性,这三个问题分别涉及该途径的不同组成部分(步骤)、具有相似不良后果的人类综合征的病理学以及定量方面。后者包括种间差异和体外 - 体内差异。基于专家判断,综合证据被评为对与人类相关性的“强”、“中”或“弱”支持。通过将所开发的工作流程应用于一个描述子宫内接触三唑后颅面畸形的不良结局途径(AOP)的案例研究进行了测试。基于为三个主要问题中的两个收集的证据,该案例研究为AOP的各个组成部分及其相关新方法学与人类的相关性提供了中度到有力的支持。此外,它表明该工作流程是一种有前景的方法,能够对毒理学途径和相关新方法学与人类的相关性进行更透明的科学评估。因此,尽管有一些需要改进的地方,但我们认为该工作流程是在人类健康风险评估中应用AOP和相关新方法学向前迈出的重要一步。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验