• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线情境干预对敌意归因偏差和情绪调节困难的影响:一项从预防犯罪角度开展的实证研究

The impact of online situational interventions on hostile attribution bias and emotion regulation difficulties: an empirical study from the perspective of crime prevention.

作者信息

Ye Weixuan, Wang Zhiqiang, Xu Shuhui

机构信息

Department of Psychology, School of Education, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, China.

School of Teacher Education, Taizhou University, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 14;13(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02720-1.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02720-1
PMID:40229640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11995620/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Adolescent aggression leading to crime is a growing global issue, and understanding its antecedents is crucial. Previous studies have shown that hostile attribution bias and difficulties in emotion regulation are significant psychological factors influencing aggression. However, traditional interventions are limited by time and space constraints. Online contextual interventions offer flexibility but have remained underutilized in this field. This study examines the predictive role of hostile attribution bias and difficulties in emotion regulation in adolescent aggression and explores the impact of online interventions on reducing these biases, assessing their potential for preventing adolescent crime.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to first verify the significant predictive role of hostile attribution bias and emotion regulation difficulties in adolescent aggression. Secondly, it seeks to explore whether online contextual interventions effectively reduce hostile attribution bias and improve emotion regulation ability, ultimately aiming to reduce aggression and prevent crime.

METHODS

This research consists of two studies. Study 1 involved a survey of 559 adolescents from Wenzhou, China, using the Adolescent Aggression Questionnaire, Hostile Attribution Bias Scale, and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Pearson correlation, regression analysis, and mediation tests were employed to analyze the data. Study 2 employed a randomized controlled design, dividing participants into experimental and control groups. The experimental group received online interventions targeting hostile attribution and emotion regulation ability, while the control group viewed unrelated documentaries. Post-intervention, both groups were reassessed, and independent sample t-tests were used to evaluate the effects.

RESULTS

Study 1 showed that hostile attribution bias (r =.577, p <.001) and emotion regulation difficulties (r =.630, p <.001) significantly predicted adolescent aggression, explaining 50.6% of the behavioral variance (R² = 0.506). Study 2 demonstrated a significant reduction in hostile attribution bias (M = 55.15, SD = 18.35, t = 3.05, p =.010) and emotion regulation difficulties (M = 33.46, SD = 14.02, t = 4.81, p <.001) in the experimental group post-intervention, while the control group showed no significant changes.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Hostile attribution bias and emotion regulation difficulties significantly predict adolescent aggression; (2) Online contextual interventions effectively reduce hostile attribution bias and improve emotion regulation abilities in adolescents; (3) The study provides theoretical and empirical support for using online interventions in behavioral correction and crime prevention in adolescents; (4) Online interventions offer a convenient, efficient approach to preventing aggression and crime among adolescents.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

This study was retrospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500100303, registration date: April 7, 2025).

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/11995620/b0c275d69704/40359_2025_2720_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/11995620/d6f253844e7c/40359_2025_2720_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/11995620/1086e2c91358/40359_2025_2720_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/11995620/b0c275d69704/40359_2025_2720_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/11995620/d6f253844e7c/40359_2025_2720_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/11995620/1086e2c91358/40359_2025_2720_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/11995620/b0c275d69704/40359_2025_2720_Fig3_HTML.jpg
摘要

引言

青少年攻击性导致犯罪是一个日益严重的全球性问题,了解其成因至关重要。以往研究表明,敌意归因偏差和情绪调节困难是影响攻击性的重要心理因素。然而,传统干预措施受到时间和空间限制。在线情境干预具有灵活性,但在该领域仍未得到充分利用。本研究考察敌意归因偏差和情绪调节困难在青少年攻击行为中的预测作用,并探讨在线干预对减少这些偏差的影响,评估其预防青少年犯罪的潜力。

目的

本研究旨在首先验证敌意归因偏差和情绪调节困难在青少年攻击行为中的显著预测作用。其次,探讨在线情境干预是否能有效减少敌意归因偏差并提高情绪调节能力,最终目标是减少攻击行为并预防犯罪。

方法

本研究包括两项研究。研究1对来自中国温州的559名青少年进行了调查,使用了青少年攻击问卷、敌意归因偏差量表和情绪调节困难量表。采用Pearson相关性分析、回归分析和中介检验对数据进行分析。研究2采用随机对照设计,将参与者分为实验组和对照组。实验组接受针对敌意归因和情绪调节能力的在线干预,而对照组观看无关纪录片。干预后,对两组进行重新评估,并使用独立样本t检验评估效果。

结果

研究1表明,敌意归因偏差(r = 0.577,p < 0.001)和情绪调节困难(r = 0.630,p < 0.001)显著预测青少年攻击行为,解释了50.6%的行为变异(R² = 0.506)。研究2表明,干预后实验组的敌意归因偏差(M = 55.15,SD = 18.35,t = 3.05,p = 0.010)和情绪调节困难(M = 33.46,SD = 14.02,t = 4.81,p < 0.001)显著降低,而对照组无显著变化。

结论

(1)敌意归因偏差和情绪调节困难显著预测青少年攻击行为;(2)在线情境干预有效减少青少年的敌意归因偏差并提高情绪调节能力;(3)本研究为在线干预在青少年行为矫正和犯罪预防中的应用提供了理论和实证支持;(4)在线干预为预防青少年攻击行为和犯罪提供了一种便捷、高效的方法。

临床试验编号

本研究在中国临床试验注册中心进行了回顾性注册(ChiCTR2500100303,注册日期:2025年4月7日)。

相似文献

1
The impact of online situational interventions on hostile attribution bias and emotion regulation difficulties: an empirical study from the perspective of crime prevention.在线情境干预对敌意归因偏差和情绪调节困难的影响:一项从预防犯罪角度开展的实证研究
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 14;13(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02720-1.
2
The relationship between trait anger and reactive aggressive behavior in middle school students: the mediating role and intervention of hostile attribution bias.中学生特质愤怒与反应性攻击行为的关系:敌意归因偏差的中介作用与干预
BMC Psychol. 2024 Aug 2;12(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01918-z.
3
Modification of hostile attribution bias reduces self-reported reactive aggressive behavior in adolescents.敌意归因偏差的修正可减少青少年自我报告的反应性攻击行为。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Jun;194:104811. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104811. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
4
Applying a bifactor model to the functions of relational aggression: Associations with hostile attribution biases and difficulties with emotion regulation.将双因素模型应用于关系攻击的功能:与敌意归因偏差及情绪调节困难的关联。
Aggress Behav. 2023 Jan;49(1):58-67. doi: 10.1002/ab.22053. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
5
Subtypes of Aggressive Behavior in Children with Autism in the Context of Emotion Recognition, Hostile Attribution Bias, and Dysfunctional Emotion Regulation.自闭症儿童的攻击行为亚型在情绪识别、敌意归因偏差和情绪调节功能障碍的背景下。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Dec;52(12):5367-5382. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05387-w. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
6
The mediating role of hostile attribution bias in social exclusion affecting aggressive behavior.社会排斥对攻击行为影响中敌意归因偏差的中介作用。
Aggress Behav. 2024 Jun;50(4):e22169. doi: 10.1002/ab.22169.
7
Longitudinal relationships among interpersonal openness trait, hostile attribution bias, and displaced aggressive behaviour: Big Five treated as covariates.人格五因素模型作为协变量的人际开放性特质、敌意归因偏差与替代性攻击行为的纵向关系。
Int J Psychol. 2021 Oct;56(5):669-678. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12745. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
8
Measuring proactive and reactive criminal thinking with the PICTS: correlations with outcome expectancies and hostile attribution biases.使用PICTS测量主动和被动犯罪思维:与结果预期和敌意归因偏差的相关性。
J Interpers Violence. 2007 Apr;22(4):371-85. doi: 10.1177/0886260506296988.
9
Why narcissists are more likely to be aggressive? The role of hostile attribution bias.为什么自恋者更有可能具有攻击性?敌意归因偏差的作用。
Int J Psychol. 2023 Dec;58(6):518-525. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12924. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
10
Effects of interpretation bias modification on hostile attribution bias and reactive cyber-aggression in Chinese adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.解释偏差修正对中国青少年敌意归因偏差和反应性网络攻击行为的影响:一项随机对照试验
Curr Psychol. 2023 Mar 10:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04433-3.

本文引用的文献

1
A Framework for Ethical Payment to Research Participants.研究参与者伦理支付框架。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):766-771. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1710591.
2
Learning to keep your cool: reducing aggression through the experimental modification of cognitive control.学会保持冷静:通过认知控制的实验性改变来减少攻击性。
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(2):251-65. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.911146. Epub 2014 May 6.
3
Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review.情绪调节策略在精神病理学中的跨学科研究:一项元分析综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Mar;30(2):217-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
4
A behavior change model for internet interventions.互联网干预行为改变模型。
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Aug;38(1):18-27. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9133-4. Epub 2009 Oct 4.
5
Self-regulatory failure and intimate partner violence perpetration.自我调节失败与亲密伴侣暴力行为
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Sep;97(3):483-99. doi: 10.1037/a0015433.
6
Sex differences in left-handedness: a meta-analysis of 144 studies.左利手的性别差异:144项研究的荟萃分析
Psychol Bull. 2008 Sep;134(5):677-699. doi: 10.1037/a0012814.
7
The adolescent brain.青少年大脑。
Dev Rev. 2008;28(1):62-77. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.003.
8
Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences.情绪调节:情感、认知及社会后果。
Psychophysiology. 2002 May;39(3):281-91. doi: 10.1017/s0048577201393198.
9
Biosocial studies of antisocial and violent behavior in children and adults: a review.儿童和成人反社会及暴力行为的生物社会学研究:综述
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2002 Aug;30(4):311-26. doi: 10.1023/a:1015754122318.
10
Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: a meta-analysis.敌意意图归因与攻击行为:一项元分析
Child Dev. 2002 May-Jun;73(3):916-34. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00447.