MYAS-GNDU Department of Sports Sciences and Medicine, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Oct;40:217-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of frequency specific intramuscular electrical stimulation on post trigger point dry needling soreness.
Dry needling (DN) with intramuscular electrical stimulation (DN/IMES) has been shown to be effective in reducing post needling soreness. The effect of frequency specific intramuscular electrical stimulation on post needling soreness has not been studied abundantly, but initial results are favorable. This study investigated the effect of frequency specific intramuscular electrical stimulation on post needling soreness.
A convenience sample of 45 (α = 0.05, power = 95%) subjects was recruited for this study and randomly assigned to DN (n = 15), DN/IMES [f-2Hz] (n = 15) and DN/IMES [f-100Hz] (n = 15) groups. Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) were measured before and 24 hours after the intervention.
Both DN/IMES [f-2Hz and 100 Hz] groups showed statistically significant improvement in NPRS (p = 0.001 and 0.00005, respectively) and PPT (p = 0.004 and 0.0002, respectively). No statistically significant changes were observed in DN group in NPRS (p = 0.726) and PPT (p = 0.238).
Both dry needling with Intramuscular electrical stimulation (DN/IMES [f-2Hz and 100Hz]) groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement in soreness as compared to DN group, but DN/IMES [f-100 Hz] group showed more significant improvement as compared to DN/IMES [f-2 Hz] group in reducing post needling soreness.
本研究旨在比较频率特异性肌内电刺激对触发点后干针疼痛的影响。
肌内电刺激(DN/IMES)结合干针(DN)已被证明可有效减轻针刺后的疼痛。频率特异性肌内电刺激对针刺后疼痛的影响尚未得到充分研究,但初步结果是有利的。本研究探讨了频率特异性肌内电刺激对针刺后疼痛的影响。
本研究采用便利抽样法招募了 45 名(α=0.05,功率=95%)受试者,并将其随机分为 DN 组(n=15)、DN/IMES [f-2Hz] 组(n=15)和 DN/IMES [f-100Hz] 组。在干预前后测量疼痛压力阈值(PPT)和数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)。
DN/IMES [f-2Hz 和 100Hz] 组的 NPRS(p=0.001 和 0.00005)和 PPT(p=0.004 和 0.0002)均有统计学显著改善。DN 组的 NPRS(p=0.726)和 PPT(p=0.238)均无统计学显著变化。
与 DN 组相比,DN/IMES [f-2Hz 和 100Hz] 组的针刺后疼痛均有统计学显著改善,但与 DN/IMES [f-2Hz] 组相比,DN/IMES [f-100Hz] 组在减轻针刺后疼痛方面的改善更为显著。