Bhammar Dharini M, Wilhite Daniel P, Olojo Temitayo, Alagappan Kavya, Jones Katerina, Liu Yu-Lun, Babb Tony G
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Center for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 Apr;60(4):e71061. doi: 10.1002/ppul.71061.
Childhood obesity is associated with a higher risk of sleep-disordered breathing, but our understanding of the underlying physiologic mechanisms is limited. This study investigated the effects of obesity on lung volumes, expiratory flow limitation (EFL), and respiratory symptoms in the supine position.
Ninety-four children (8-12 years old, n = 58 with obesity and n = 36 without obesity) underwent lung volume and EFL measurements in the seated and supine positions in this repeated-measures cross-sectional study. Children without obesity underwent an additional condition where either a 2.3 kg (n = 26) or 5.0 kg (n = 8) mass was placed on their abdomen to simulate obesity. Ratings of perceived breathlessness (RPB) were recorded.
Functional residual capacity (FRC) in the supine when compared with the seated posture decreased more so in children without obesity (43.9 ± 1.0 vs. 34.4 ± 1.0% total lung capacity [TLC]) compared with children with obesity (35.5 ± 0.8 vs. 29.6 ± 0.8% TLC; p = 0.0048 group*posture). EFL in the supine position was present in 17% of children with obesity compared with 6% of children without obesity (p = 0.1218). In children without obesity, mass-loading with 5.0 kg produced further reductions in FRC (seated: 45.0 ± 1.7% TLC; supine: 36.7 ± 1.7% TLC; supine+5.0 kg: 29.4 ± 1.7% TLC; p = 0.0087 seated vs. supine+ and p = 0.0178 supine vs. supine + ) and an increase in RPB (seated: 0.38 ± 0.24; supine: 0.42 ± 0.24; supine+5.0 kg: 1.25 ± 0.27; p = 0.0002 seated vs. supine+ and p = 0.0001 supine vs. supine + ).
Children with obesity breathe at significantly lower lung volumes while supine, increasing the risk of EFL. A better physiologic understanding of the mechanical effects of obesity could potentially improve the management of sleep-related symptoms among children with obesity.
儿童肥胖与睡眠呼吸障碍风险较高相关,但我们对其潜在生理机制的了解有限。本研究调查了肥胖对仰卧位时肺容量、呼气流量受限(EFL)及呼吸症状的影响。
在这项重复测量的横断面研究中,94名儿童(8至12岁,58名肥胖儿童和36名非肥胖儿童)在坐位和仰卧位进行了肺容量和EFL测量。非肥胖儿童还经历了另外两种情况,即分别在其腹部放置2.3千克(n = 26)或5.0千克(n = 8)的重物以模拟肥胖。记录了主观呼吸急促评分(RPB)。
与坐位相比,仰卧位时非肥胖儿童的功能残气量(FRC)下降幅度更大(占肺总量[TLC]的比例分别为43.9±1.0%和34.4±1.0%),而肥胖儿童的下降幅度相对较小(分别为35.5±0.8%和29.6±0.8% TLC;组*体位p = 0.0048)。17%的肥胖儿童在仰卧位时存在EFL,而非肥胖儿童中这一比例为6%(p = 0.1218)。在非肥胖儿童中,腹部加载5.0千克重物会使FRC进一步降低(坐位:45.0±1.7% TLC;仰卧位:36.7±1.7% TLC;仰卧位 + 5.0千克:29.4±1.7% TLC;坐位与仰卧位 + 相比p = 0.0087,仰卧位与仰卧位 + 相比p = 0.0178),并使RPB增加(坐位:0.38±0.24;仰卧位:0.42±0.24;仰卧位 + 5.0千克:1.25±0.27;坐位与仰卧位 + 相比p = 0.0002,仰卧位与仰卧位 + 相比p = 0.0001)。
肥胖儿童仰卧位时肺容量显著降低,增加了EFL的风险。更好地从生理角度理解肥胖的机械效应可能会改善肥胖儿童睡眠相关症状的管理。