Yap J C, Watson R A, Gilbey S, Pride N B
Department of Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1995 Oct;79(4):1199-205. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.4.1199.
Increased abdominal mass in obesity should enhance normal gravitational effects on supine respiratory mechanics. We have examined respiratory impedance (forced oscillation over 4-26 Hz applied at the mouth during tidal breathing), maximum inspiratory and expiratory mouth pressures (MIP and MEP), and maximum effort flow-volume curves seated and supine in seven obese subjects (O) (mean age 51 yr, body mass index 43.6 kg/m2) and seven control subjects (C) (mean age 50 yr, body mass index 21.8 kg/m2). Seated mean total lung capacity was smaller in O than in C (82 vs. 100% of predicted); ratio of functional residual capacity (FRC) to total lung capacity averaged 43% in O and 61% in C (P < 0.01). Total respiratory resistance (Rrs) at 6 Hz seated was higher in O (4.6 cmH2O.l-1.s) than in C (2.2 cmH2O.l-1.s; P < 0.001); total respiratory reactance (Xrs) at 6 Hz was lower in O than in C. In C, on changing to the supine posture, mean Rrs at 6 Hz rose to 2.9 cmH2O.l-1.s, FRC fell by 0.68 liter, and Xrs at 6 Hz showed a small fall. In O, despite no further fall in FRC, supine Rrs at 6 Hz increased to 7.3 cmH2O.l-1.s, and marked frequency dependency of Rrs and falls in Xrs developed. Seated, MIP and MEP in C and O were similar; supine there were small falls in MEP and maximum expiratory flow in O. The site and mechanism of the increase in supine Rrs and reduction in supine Xrs and the mechanism maintaining supine FRC in obesity all need further investigation.
肥胖患者腹部肿物增加应会增强重力对仰卧位呼吸力学的正常影响。我们检测了7名肥胖受试者(O组)(平均年龄51岁,体重指数43.6kg/m²)和7名对照受试者(C组)(平均年龄50岁,体重指数21.8kg/m²)在坐位和仰卧位时的呼吸阻抗(潮气呼吸时经口施加4 - 26Hz的强迫振荡)、最大吸气压和呼气压(MIP和MEP)以及最大用力流量-容积曲线。坐位时,O组的平均肺总量低于C组(分别为预测值的82%和100%);O组的功能残气量(FRC)与肺总量之比平均为43%,C组为61%(P<0.01)。坐位时,O组6Hz的总呼吸阻力(Rrs)高于C组(4.6cmH₂O·l⁻¹·s比2.2cmH₂O·l⁻¹·s;P<0.001);O组6Hz的总呼吸电抗(Xrs)低于C组。在C组,改为仰卧位时,6Hz的平均Rrs升至2.9cmH₂O·l⁻¹·s,FRC下降0.68升,6Hz的Xrs略有下降。在O组,尽管FRC没有进一步下降,但仰卧位时6Hz的Rrs增至7.3cmH₂O·l⁻¹·s,且Rrs出现明显的频率依赖性,Xrs下降。坐位时,C组和O组的MIP和MEP相似;仰卧位时,O组的MEP和最大呼气流量略有下降。肥胖患者仰卧位Rrs增加、仰卧位Xrs降低以及维持仰卧位FRC的部位和机制均需进一步研究。