Folivi Folly, Bravo Adrian J, Pearson Matthew R
Department of Psychological Sciences, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA USA.
Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA.
Mindfulness (N Y). 2025;16(4):1046-1060. doi: 10.1007/s12671-025-02544-5. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
The present study aimed to identify distinct profiles of mindfulness among a sample of university students in the USA who use alcohol and cannabis. Further, we examined whether these mindfulness profiles were indirectly associated with alcohol and cannabis-related outcomes via alcohol and cannabis use motives.
Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to determine the number of latent classes among 771 US university students (75.7% White, 66.8% female) who consumed alcohol and cannabis in the prior month. Additionally, parallel mediation analyses were conducted to determine whether mindfulness profiles were indirectly associated with alcohol- and cannabis-related outcomes via alcohol and cannabis use motives.
LPA indicated a 4-class solution fit optimally. Further, the high mindfulness group was generally the most adaptive (lower scores) across alcohol and cannabis outcomes, whereas the judgmentally observing group was generally the most maladaptive (higher scores). Indirect effect analyses revealed that compared to the low mindfulness group, the high mindfulness group reported lower scores on alcohol- and cannabis-related outcomes via lower alcohol- and cannabis-related coping motives.
These findings can inform prevention and intervention efforts using mindfulness techniques and interventions among students who engage in problematic alcohol and cannabis use.
This study is not preregistered.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12671-025-02544-5.
本研究旨在识别美国使用酒精和大麻的大学生样本中的不同正念特征。此外,我们还研究了这些正念特征是否通过酒精和大麻使用动机与酒精和大麻相关结果存在间接关联。
潜在类别分析(LPA)用于确定771名美国大学生(75.7%为白人,66.8%为女性)中的潜在类别数量,这些学生在前一个月使用过酒精和大麻。此外,进行了平行中介分析,以确定正念特征是否通过酒精和大麻使用动机与酒精和大麻相关结果存在间接关联。
LPA表明四类解决方案拟合最优。此外,高正念组在酒精和大麻相关结果方面通常最具适应性(得分较低),而评判性观察组通常最不具适应性(得分较高)。间接效应分析显示,与低正念组相比,高正念组通过较低的酒精和大麻相关应对动机在酒精和大麻相关结果上得分较低。
这些发现可为针对有问题的酒精和大麻使用学生采用正念技术和干预措施的预防和干预工作提供参考。
本研究未进行预注册。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s12671-025-02544-5获取的补充材料。