Suppr超能文献

卵圆孔未闭封堵术与药物治疗预防复发性隐源性卒中的比较:一项系统评价

Comparison of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure vs Medical Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent Cryptogenic Stroke: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Hamodat Omar, Almuzainy Saif, Yahya Rand, Koniali Salam

机构信息

College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 29;37(2):5. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1427. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The optimal management approach for patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO) remains uncertain. Whether medical therapy-using antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants-or transcatheter device closure offers superior protection against stroke recurrence has been a topic of considerable debate. This systematic review aims to assess and compare the effectiveness of these two treatment strategies, incorporating recent studies to provide updated insights on the most effective approach to preventing recurrent cryptogenic stroke.

METHODOLOGY

We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid database through December 2024. Eligible studies were randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) comparing PFO closure versus medical therapy among patients with cryptogenic stroke.

RESULTS

This systematic review analyzed 7 RCTs encompassing 4539 patients with a mean age of 43.6 years, 53.38 % of whom were male. Patient characteristics, including comorbidities such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus, were well-balanced across groups receiving PFO closure or medical therapy. The primary analysis revealed a significant reduction in stroke incidence with PFO closure compared to medical therapy, with no stroke events in the PFO closure groups of the CLOSE and DEFENSE-PFO trials. Similarly, transient ischemic attack (TIA) incidence was consistently lower in PFO closure groups. All-cause mortality was comparable between groups, underscoring the safety profile of PFO closure. However, PFO closure was associated with a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation. Major bleeding risks varied, reflecting the need for tailored risk assessment.

CONCLUSION

PFO closure offers a significant advantage over medical therapy in preventing recurrent cryptogenic stroke and TIA. Nevertheless, the observed increase in atrial fibrillation postclosure highlights the need for additional research to elucidate its long-term implications and to determine whether anticoagulation could benefit specific subsets of patients with PFO and a history of stroke.

摘要

目的

对于隐源性卒中合并卵圆孔未闭(PFO)的患者,最佳管理方法仍不明确。使用抗血小板药物或抗凝剂的药物治疗,还是经导管装置封堵,能提供更好的预防卒中复发的保护作用,一直是一个备受争议的话题。本系统评价旨在评估和比较这两种治疗策略的有效性,纳入近期研究以提供关于预防复发性隐源性卒中最有效方法的最新见解。

方法

我们系统检索了截至2024年12月的PubMed、Scopus和Ovid数据库。符合条件的研究为随机对照临床试验(RCT),比较隐源性卒中患者中PFO封堵与药物治疗。

结果

本系统评价分析了7项RCT,共纳入4539例患者,平均年龄43.6岁,其中53.38%为男性。接受PFO封堵或药物治疗的各组患者特征,包括高血压、高脂血症和糖尿病等合并症,均保持良好平衡。初步分析显示,与药物治疗相比,PFO封堵可显著降低卒中发生率,在CLOSE和DEFENSE - PFO试验的PFO封堵组中无卒中事件发生。同样,PFO封堵组的短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)发生率也一直较低。各组间全因死亡率相当,这突出了PFO封堵的安全性。然而,PFO封堵与房颤发生率较高相关。主要出血风险各不相同,这反映了需要进行针对性的风险评估。

结论

在预防复发性隐源性卒中和TIA方面,PFO封堵比药物治疗具有显著优势。然而,封堵后观察到的房颤增加凸显了需要进一步研究以阐明其长期影响,并确定抗凝是否能使特定的PFO合并卒中病史患者亚组受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fd7/11996193/62a29912bec5/sha15f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验