Suppr超能文献

肺癌筛查CT检出实性肺结节的Lung-RADS 2022版与英国胸科学会指南的比较

Comparison of Lung-RADS Version 2022 and British Thoracic Society Guidelines in Classifying Solid Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening CT.

作者信息

Avram Claudiu, Mederle Alexandru Ovidiu, Mavrea Adelina, Barata Paula Irina, Patrascu Raul

机构信息

Doctoral School, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Department of Surgery, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2024 Dec 27;15(1):14. doi: 10.3390/life15010014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Lung cancer screening is critical for early detection and management, particularly through the use of computed tomography (CT). This study aims to compare the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) Version 2022 with the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines in classifying solid pulmonary nodules detected at lung cancer screening CT examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 224 patients who underwent lung cancer screening CT between 2016 and 2022 and had a reported solid pulmonary nodule. A fellowship-trained thoracic radiologist reviewed the CT images, characterizing nodules by size, location, margins, attenuation, calcification, growth at follow-up, and final pathologic diagnosis if malignant. The sensitivity and specificity of Lung-RADS Version 2022 in detecting malignant nodules were compared with those of the BTS guidelines using the McNemar test.

RESULTS

Of the 224 patients, 198 (88%) had nodules deemed benign, while 26 (12%) had malignant nodules. The Lung-RADS Version 2022 resulted in higher specificity than the BTS guidelines (85% vs. 65%, < 0.001), without sacrificing sensitivity (92% for both). Nodules larger than 8 mm, spiculated margins, upper lobe location, and interval growth were associated with higher malignancy risk ( < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the BTS guidelines, Lung-RADS Version 2022 reduces the number of false-positive screening CT examinations while maintaining high sensitivity for detecting malignant solid pulmonary nodules.

摘要

背景与目的

肺癌筛查对于早期发现和治疗至关重要,尤其是通过计算机断层扫描(CT)进行筛查。本研究旨在比较2022版肺部影像报告和数据系统(Lung-RADS)与英国胸科学会(BTS)指南在肺癌筛查CT检查中发现的实性肺结节分类方面的差异。

材料与方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2016年至2022年间接受肺癌筛查CT检查且报告有实性肺结节的224例患者。一位经过专科培训的胸放射科医生对CT图像进行了复查,根据大小、位置、边缘、密度、钙化、随访期间的生长情况以及恶性时的最终病理诊断对结节进行了特征描述。使用McNemar检验比较了2022版Lung-RADS在检测恶性结节方面的敏感性和特异性与BTS指南的敏感性和特异性。

结果

在224例患者中,198例(88%)的结节被判定为良性,而26例(12%)有恶性结节。2022版Lung-RADS的特异性高于BTS指南(85%对65%,<0.001),且不影响敏感性(两者均为92%)。直径大于8mm、边缘有毛刺、位于上叶以及有间隔生长的结节与更高的恶性风险相关(<0.01)。

结论

与BTS指南相比,2022版Lung-RADS减少了CT筛查假阳性检查的数量,同时对检测恶性实性肺结节保持高敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a9/11767224/75ebfabb8ea0/life-15-00014-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验