Department of Neurology, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 17;7(12):e008356. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008356.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, anticoagulation, and antiplatelet therapy to prevent stroke recurrence in patients with PFO-associated cryptogenic stroke.
We searched Medline, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE through March 2018. The primary outcome was stroke recurrence. Pooled incidences, hazard ratios, and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated in random-effects meta-analyses. PFO closure was associated with a lower risk of recurrent stroke compared with antithrombotic therapy (antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation: 3560 patients from 6 RCTs; RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.17-0.79; I=59%). The effect of PFO closure on stroke recurrence was larger in patients with atrial septal aneurysm or large shunt (RR=0.27, 95% CI, 0.11-0.70; I=42%) compared with patients without these anatomical features (RR=0.80, 95% CI, 0.43-1.47; I=12%). Major complications occurred in 2.40% (95% CI, 1.03-4.25; I=77%) of procedures. New-onset atrial fibrillation was more frequent in patients randomized to PFO closure versus antithrombotic therapy (RR=4.33, 95% CI, 2.37-7.89; I=14%). One RCT compared PFO closure versus anticoagulation (353 patients; hazard ratio=0.14, 95% CI, 0.00-1.45) and 2 RCTs compared PFO closure versus antiplatelet therapy (1137 patients; hazard ratio=0.18, 95% CI, 0.05-0.63; I=12%). Three RCTs compared anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy, with none showing a significant difference.
PFO closure is superior to antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke recurrence after cryptogenic stroke. The annual absolute risk reduction of stroke was low, but it has to be tempered by a substantial time at risk (at least 5 years) in young and middle-aged patients. PFO closure was associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation.
我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,比较了卵圆孔未闭(PFO)封堵、抗凝和抗血小板治疗预防伴有隐源性卒中的 PFO 患者卒中复发的随机对照试验(RCT)。
我们通过 Medline、Cochrane 图书馆和 EMBASE 检索了截至 2018 年 3 月的文献。主要结局为卒中复发。在随机效应荟萃分析中计算了累积发生率、危险比和风险比(RR)。与抗血栓治疗(抗血小板治疗或抗凝治疗:来自 6 项 RCT 的 3560 例患者;RR=0.36,95%CI:0.17-0.79;I²=59%)相比,PFO 封堵可降低卒中复发风险。与无这些解剖特征的患者相比(RR=0.80,95%CI,0.43-1.47;I²=12%),PFO 封堵对卒中复发的影响在伴有房间隔瘤或大分流的患者中更大(RR=0.27,95%CI,0.11-0.70;I²=42%)。手术中发生主要并发症的比例为 2.40%(95%CI,1.03-4.25;I²=77%)。与抗血栓治疗相比,PFO 封堵组患者新发心房颤动更为常见(RR=4.33,95%CI,2.37-7.89;I²=14%)。一项 RCT 比较了 PFO 封堵与抗凝(353 例患者;危险比=0.14,95%CI,0.00-1.45),两项 RCT 比较了 PFO 封堵与抗血小板治疗(1137 例患者;危险比=0.18,95%CI,0.05-0.63;I²=12%)。三项 RCT 比较了抗凝与抗血小板治疗,均未显示差异有统计学意义。
与抗血栓治疗相比,PFO 封堵可预防隐源性卒中后卒中复发。卒中年绝对风险降低率较低,但在年轻和中年患者中,风险时间较长(至少 5 年),这一结果需要慎重考虑。PFO 封堵与心房颤动风险增加相关。