Faideci Emre Melik, Alak Mehmet Emin, Güzel Sinan, Bekler Özkan, Güven Gülden, Hancıoğlu Emirhan, Çolakoğlu Gevher Ceyla Zeynep, Özcan Sevgi, Dönmez Esra, Ziyrek Murat
Cardiology Clinic, Bilecik Training and Research Hospital, Pelitözü, Bilecik, Turkey.
Cardiology Clinic, Istanbul Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):233-241. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31532. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the aorta-right coronary artery angle (ARA) on lesion localization and its protective effect in the critical osteal region in patients with dominant right coronary artery (RCA).
This cross-sectional study included 294 patients who underwent elective coronary angiography for stable angina pectoris and had a single significant lumen stenosis (50%-95%) before the RCA crux. Patients with tortuous vessels, previous interventions, left-dominant circulation, or insufficient image quality were excluded. ARA, lesion criticality, length, and distance from the aorto-osteal junction were calculated using quantitative coronary analysis. Patients were categorized based on lesion location: osteal, proximal, mid, and distal regions.
ARA increased significantly as the lesion localization moved distally (osteal: 53.26° ± 5.65°, proximal: 60.79° ± 9.53°, mid: 82.33° ± 9.85°, distal: 93.53° ± 7.46°; p < 0.0001). A strong positive correlation was found between ARA and the distance of the lesion from the aorto-osteal junction (r = 0.759, p < 0.0001). In binary regression, ARA was the only independent risk factor for critical lesion localization in the osteal region (OR = 0.915; 95% CI 0.868-0.965, p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed that an ARA > 73.50° had 83.2% sensitivity and 81.3% specificity for excluding critical lesions in the osteal region (AUC = 0.861; 95% CI 0.815-0.907).
A narrow ARA increases the likelihood of critical lesions in the osteal RCA, while an ARA > 73.50° is protective. These findings suggest ARA could guide risk assessment and treatment planning in coronary interventions.
本研究旨在评估主动脉-右冠状动脉夹角(ARA)对右冠状动脉优势型患者病变定位的影响及其在关键骨部区域的保护作用。
这项横断面研究纳入了294例因稳定型心绞痛接受择期冠状动脉造影且在右冠状动脉交叉点之前存在单一显著管腔狭窄(50%-95%)的患者。排除血管迂曲、既往有干预史、左冠状动脉优势型循环或图像质量不佳的患者。使用定量冠状动脉分析计算ARA、病变严重程度、长度以及距主动脉-骨部交界处的距离。根据病变位置将患者分为:骨部、近端、中部和远端区域。
随着病变定位向远端移动,ARA显著增加(骨部:53.26°±5.65°,近端:60.79°±9.53°,中部:82.33°±9.85°,远端:93.53°±7.46°;p<0.0001)。ARA与病变距主动脉-骨部交界处的距离之间存在强正相关(r=0.759,p<0.0001)。在二元回归中,ARA是骨部区域关键病变定位的唯一独立危险因素(OR=0.915;95%CI 0.868-0.965,p<0.001)。ROC分析显示,ARA>73.50°对排除骨部区域关键病变的敏感性为83.2%,特异性为81.3%(AUC=0.861;95%CI 0.815-0.907)。
狭窄的ARA增加了右冠状动脉骨部关键病变的可能性,而ARA>73.50°具有保护作用。这些发现表明ARA可指导冠状动脉介入治疗中的风险评估和治疗规划。