• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一般实践环境中意大利语版GHQ的验证

Validation of the Italian version of the GHQ in a general practice setting.

作者信息

Fontanesi F, Gobetti C, Zimmermann-Tansella C, Tansella M

出版信息

Psychol Med. 1985 May;15(2):411-5. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700023710.

DOI:10.1017/s0033291700023710
PMID:4023145
Abstract

The 30-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and the Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS) were administered to 120 consecutive attenders at a general practice in Northern Italy run by a doctor who had a formal psychiatric training. The Italian versions of both the GHQ and the CIS were found to be feasible instruments for general practice studies in Italy. GHQ misclassification rates, sensitivity and specificity values are presented for different cut-off scores, a total score of 5 or more being the best discriminator between 'cases' and 'non-cases'. The prevalence of confirmed cases in this sample was 47.5%, a rate higher than those reported so far in developed and developing countries.

摘要

对意大利北部一家由接受过正规精神科培训的医生管理的普通诊所的120名连续就诊者进行了30项一般健康问卷(GHQ)和临床访谈表(CIS)调查。结果发现,GHQ和CIS的意大利语版本都是意大利普通诊所研究的可行工具。针对不同的临界值给出了GHQ的误分类率、敏感性和特异性值,总分5分及以上是区分“病例”和“非病例”的最佳指标。该样本中确诊病例的患病率为47.5%,这一比率高于迄今为止发达国家和发展中国家报告的比率。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Italian version of the GHQ in a general practice setting.一般实践环境中意大利语版GHQ的验证
Psychol Med. 1985 May;15(2):411-5. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700023710.
2
Validation of an Italian translation of the 30-item General Health Questionnaire for use in Australia.用于澳大利亚的30项一般健康问卷意大利语翻译版本的验证。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1995 Jun;29(2):266-9. doi: 10.1080/00048679509075919.
3
Validity of the Japanese version of the GHQ among antenatal clinic attendants.日本版一般健康问卷在产前检查门诊就诊者中的效度
Psychol Med. 1989 May;19(2):507-11. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700012538.
4
The validity of the French version of the GHQ-28 and PSYDIS in a community sample of 20 year olds in Switzerland.法国版GHQ - 28和PSYDIS在瑞士20岁社区样本中的效度。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1989;238(3):161-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00451005.
5
Validation of the Arabic versions of the thirty- and twelve-item General Health Questionnaires in primary care patients.初级保健患者中30项和12项一般健康问卷阿拉伯语版本的验证
Br J Psychiatry. 1996 Nov;169(5):662-4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.169.5.662.
6
Validity of the 28-item General Health Questionnaire in hospitalized gastroenterology patients.28项一般健康问卷在住院胃肠病患者中的效度
Psychosomatics. 1989 Summer;30(3):290-5. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(89)72274-X.
7
Validation of the 30-item General Health Questionnaire in postpartum women.30项一般健康问卷在产后女性中的效度验证。
Psychol Med. 1982 May;12(2):409-13. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700046742.
8
Psychiatric screening in the emergency department: validation of the General Health Questionnaire.急诊科的精神科筛查:一般健康问卷的验证
Am J Emerg Med. 1985 Sep;3(5):419-22. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(85)90202-5.
9
Validity of the scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) in a Spanish population.一般健康问卷(GHQ - 28)简化版在西班牙人群中的效度。
Psychol Med. 1986 Feb;16(1):135-40. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700002579.
10
Detecting psychiatric disorders in medical practice using the General Health Questionnaire. Why do cut-off scores vary?使用一般健康问卷在医疗实践中检测精神障碍。为什么截断分数会有所不同?
Psychol Med. 1995 Jan;25(1):165-70. doi: 10.1017/s003329170002818x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Chatbot-Based Version of a World Health Organization-Validated Intervention (Self-Help Plus) for Stress Management in Pregnant Women: Protocol for a Usability Study.基于聊天机器人的世界卫生组织验证干预措施(自助加强版)用于孕妇压力管理:一项可用性研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 1;14:e53891. doi: 10.2196/53891.
2
Psychological distress and academic success: a two-year study comparing the outcome of two online interventions at a university counseling and consultation service in Italy.心理困扰与学业成就:一项为期两年的研究,比较意大利一所大学咨询与辅导服务中心的两种在线干预措施的效果。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 8;15:1427316. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1427316. eCollection 2024.
3
Systematic Review of Instruments Assessing Psychosocial Adaptation and Outcomes Among Families of Children With Congenital Heart Disease.
系统评价评估先天性心脏病患儿家庭的心理社会适应和结局的工具。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2023 Jul 5;48(6):537-552. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsad015.
4
"Hang in There!": Mental Health in a Sample of the Italian Civil Protection Volunteers during the COVID-19 Health Emergency.“坚持住!”:COVID-19 卫生紧急事件期间意大利民防志愿者样本中的心理健康。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 14;18(16):8587. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168587.
5
#Everything Will Be Fine. Duration of Home Confinement and "All-or-Nothing" Cognitive Thinking Style as Predictors of Traumatic Distress in Young University Students on a Digital Platform During the COVID-19 Italian Lockdown.一切都会好起来的。居家隔离时长和“全或无”认知思维方式作为意大利新冠疫情封锁期间数字平台上青年大学生创伤性应激反应的预测因素
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 15;11:574812. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.574812. eCollection 2020.
6
DAily time use, Physical Activity, quality of care and interpersonal relationships in patients with Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (DiAPASon): an Italian multicentre study.每日时间利用、身体活动、精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的护理质量和人际关系(DiAPASon):一项意大利多中心研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 8;20(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02588-y.
7
Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the 14-item Resilience Scale.14项复原力量表意大利语版本的信度与效度
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2016 Oct 3;9:277-284. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S115657. eCollection 2016.
8
The validation of the general health questionnaire (ghq-28) in a primary care setting in saudi arabia.沙特阿拉伯基层医疗环境中一般健康问卷(GHQ - 28)的验证
J Family Community Med. 1998 Jan;5(1):13-9.
9
Psychological distress and its correlates in secondary school students in Pavia, Italy.意大利帕维亚中学生的心理困扰及其相关因素。
Eur J Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;13(7):779-86. doi: 10.1023/a:1007345418104.
10
The Chinese General Health Questionnaire in a psychiatric setting: the development of the Chinese scaled version.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1993 Jul;28(3):124-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00801742.