Mater Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Queensland Paediatric Cardiac Service, Queensland Children's Hospital, Australia.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2023 Jul 5;48(6):537-552. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsad015.
This systematic review identified instruments quantitatively assessing psychosocial adaptation and outcomes in families of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) and evaluated instrument psychometrics.
Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and a prospectively registered protocol, electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS) were searched from inception until June 20, 2021 for peer-reviewed articles published in English, reporting quantitative data on psychosocial outcomes among parents/caregivers, siblings, or family system. Instrument characteristics and psychometrics were extracted, and adapted COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria were applied to assess instrument quality. Descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis were used for analysis.
Overall, 108 articles reporting on 107 distinct samples across 26 countries met inclusion. Across those articles, 40 instruments assessed psychological functioning or distress, 12 assessed coping, 11 assessed quality of life constructs, 10 assessed parenting stress/caregiver burden, 10 assessed family functioning/impact, 10 assessed stress appraisal, 5 assessed sibling psychosocial outcomes, and 2 assessed couple relationship satisfaction/strain. Applying COSMIN criteria to available data on original instrument development articles/manuals for English language instruments (n = 54), 67% scored a positive property evidence rating for content validity, 39% for internal consistency, 4% for test-retest reliability, and 9% for responsiveness (longitudinal validity).
Studies vary widely in instruments used to assess psychosocial adaptation and outcomes among families of children with CHD. Instrument selection informed by robust key psychometrics, increased psychometric reporting, development of both a "toolkit" approach and a comprehensive CHD-specific family instrument are among key recommendations.
本系统评价旨在识别评估先天性心脏病 (CHD) 患儿家庭心理社会适应和结局的定量评估工具,并对工具的心理测量学特性进行评估。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目以及预先注册的方案,从建库开始至 2021 年 6 月 20 日,在 CINAHL、Embase、PubMed/MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和 SCOPUS 电子数据库中检索发表在英文期刊上的、报告父母/照顾者、兄弟姐妹或家庭系统心理社会结局的定量数据的同行评审文章。提取工具特征和心理测量学特性,并应用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准 (COSMIN) 标准评估工具质量。采用描述性统计和叙述性综合进行分析。
共有 108 篇文章报道了来自 26 个国家的 107 个不同样本,符合纳入标准。这些文章中,40 个工具评估了心理功能或痛苦,12 个评估了应对方式,11 个评估了生活质量结构,10 个评估了育儿压力/照顾者负担,10 个评估了家庭功能/影响,10 个评估了压力评估,5 个评估了兄弟姐妹的心理社会结局,2 个评估了夫妻关系满意度/紧张度。将 COSMIN 标准应用于英文工具的原始工具开发文章/手册中可用的资料(n=54),67%的工具在内容有效性方面的属性证据评分呈阳性,39%的工具在内部一致性方面呈阳性,4%的工具在重测信度方面呈阳性,9%的工具在反应度(纵向有效性)方面呈阳性。
研究中评估 CHD 患儿家庭心理社会适应和结局的工具差异很大。基于可靠的关键心理测量学特性选择工具,增加心理测量学报告,开发“工具包”方法和全面的 CHD 特定家庭工具,这些都是重要的建议。