农村地区、区域贫困与院外心脏骤停后的结局
Rurality and Area Deprivation and Outcomes After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.
作者信息
Cheek Lakota, Schmicker Robert H, Crowe Remle, Goren Emily, West Amanda, McMullan Jason, Raelson Colin, Poole Jeanne, Adams Karen, Hoering Antje, Myers Brent, Nichol Graham
机构信息
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle.
出版信息
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e253435. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3435.
IMPORTANCE
Large regional variations in outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) exist.
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether neighborhood rurality or economic deprivation where an OHCA occurred is associated with variation in emergency medical services (EMS) outcomes after OHCA.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used data collated by ESO Inc on US adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with nontraumatic OHCA receiving chest compressions or defibrillation from EMS between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023.
EXPOSURES
Rurality was assessed using Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. Deprivation was assessed using the Area Deprivation Index. Both were derived from US Census data and grouped by EMS agency.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Outcomes were restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at emergency department (ED) arrival, survival to hospital discharge, and favorable discharge destination. Discharge outcomes were only available for patients transported to hospitals using health data exchange. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for correlated data.
RESULTS
A total of 162 289 patients with OHCA had resuscitation attempted (median [IQR] age, 66 [53-76] years; 62.3% male). Overall, 28.1% of these patients lived in rural or suburban locations, 12.3% lived in areas with high deprivation, 18.7% had a first rhythm of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation or shockable by automated external defibrillator rhythm, and 27.6% received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The mean (SD) EMS response time was 8.7 (5.6) minutes. Upon arrival at the ED, 23.7% of patients had ROSC. Compared with OHCAs in urban areas with low deprivation, those in rural areas with high deprivation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.91), moderate deprivation (AOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.81), or low deprivation (AOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88) had lower odds of ROSC at ED arrival. Among patients transported to hospitals using health data exchange, OHCAs in urban areas with high or moderate deprivation had lower odds of survival (AOR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.68-0.90] and 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.89], respectively) and favorable discharge destination (AOR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.53-0.79] and 0.77 [95% CI, 0.69-0.87], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this cohort study, OHCAs in rural areas of all levels of economic deprivation were associated with less ROSC at ED arrival vs urban areas with low deprivation, and OHCAs in urban areas with high or moderate deprivation are associated with less survival and less favorable discharge destination, suggesting worse neurologic outcomes. Care improvements alone may not reduce geographic differences in outcomes after OHCA.
重要性
院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后的结局存在较大的地区差异。
目的
评估OHCA发生地的乡村程度或经济贫困状况是否与OHCA后紧急医疗服务(EMS)结局的差异相关。
设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究使用了ESO公司整理的2022年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间接受EMS进行胸外按压或除颤的美国成年(≥18岁)非创伤性OHCA患者的数据。
暴露因素
使用城乡通勤区代码评估乡村程度。使用地区贫困指数评估贫困状况。两者均来自美国人口普查数据,并按EMS机构进行分组。
主要结局和测量指标
结局包括急诊科(ED)到达时自主循环恢复(ROSC)、存活至出院以及良好的出院目的地。仅使用健康数据交换被送往医院的患者才有出院结局数据。使用广义估计方程来处理相关数据。
结果
共有162289例OHCA患者接受了复苏尝试(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为66[53 - 76]岁;男性占62.3%)。总体而言,这些患者中28.1%居住在农村或郊区,12.3%居住在高贫困地区,18.7%的初始心律为室性心动过速或心室颤动或可被自动体外除颤器电击复律,27.6%接受了旁观者心肺复苏。EMS平均(标准差)响应时间为8.7(5.6)分钟。到达ED时,23.7%的患者实现了ROSC。与低贫困城市地区的OHCA相比,高贫困农村地区(调整比值比[AOR],0.81;95%置信区间[CI],0.72 - 0.91)、中度贫困地区(AOR,0.75;95%CI,0.70 - 0.81)或低贫困地区(AOR,0.74;95%CI,0.62 - 0.88)的OHCA患者在ED到达时实现ROSC的几率较低。在使用健康数据交换被送往医院的患者中,高贫困或中度贫困城市地区的OHCA患者存活几率较低(AOR分别为0.78[95%CI,0.68 - 0.90]和0.82[95%CI,0.75 - 0.89]),且获得良好出院目的地的几率较低(AOR分别为0.65[95%CI,0.53 - 0.79]和0.77[95%CI,0.69 - 0.87])。
结论及意义
在这项队列研究中,与低贫困城市地区相比,各级经济贫困农村地区的OHCA患者在ED到达时ROSC的情况较差,高贫困或中度贫困城市地区的OHCA患者存活几率和获得良好出院目的地的几率较低,提示神经学结局较差。仅改善医疗护理可能无法减少OHCA后结局的地理差异。
相似文献
JAMA Netw Open. 2025-4-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-3-27
JAMA Netw Open. 2025-6-2
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2025
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-9-12
JAMA Netw Open. 2024-11-4
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025-6
本文引用的文献
JAMA Cardiol. 2024-8-1
Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2023-9
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022-8-5