Suppr超能文献

动态对比增强磁共振成像参数联合扩散加权成像用于鉴别浸润性导管癌患者的恶性病变、分子亚型和病理分级

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters combined with diffusion-weighted imaging for discriminating malignant lesions, molecular subtypes, and pathological grades in invasive ductal carcinoma patients.

作者信息

Zhu Gangming, Dong Yongde, Zhu Ruiting, Tan Yuanman, Liu Xiao, Tao Juan, Chen Decheng

机构信息

Department of radiology, Dongguan TungWah hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.

Department of radiology, Dongguan Songshan Lake TungWah hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Apr 15;20(4):e0320240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320240. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameters or diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) findings provide prognostic information on breast cancer. However, the accuracy of a single MRI technique is unsatisfactory. This study intended to explore the combination of DWI and DCE-MRI parameters in discriminating molecular subtypes in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) patients. Eighty-two IDC patients who underwent breast DWI and DCE-MRI examinations were retrospectively analyzed. Eighty-six patients with benign masses were retrieved as benign controls. The combination of ADC value, Ktrans, Kep, Ve, and iAUC had a good ability to discriminate IDC patients (vs. benign controls) with an area under the curve (AUC) [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 0.961 (0.935-0.987). A nomogram-based prediction model with the above combination showed a good predictive value for IDC probability. The combination of ADC value, Ktrans, Kep, and iAUC also had a certain ability to discriminate pathological grade III (vs. I or II) [AUC (95% CI): 0.698 (0.572-0.825)] in IDC patients. Notably, ADC value (P=0.010) and Kep (P=0.043) differed in IDC patients with different molecular subtypes. Besides, ADC value was increased (P<0.001), but Ktrans (P=0.037) and Kep (P=0.004) were decreased in IDC patients with Lumina A (vs. other molecular subtypes). The combination of ADC value, Ktrans, Kep, had an acceptable ability to discriminate Luminal A (vs. other molecular subtypes) [AUC (95% CI): 0.845 (0.748-0.941)] in IDC patients. DWI combined with DCE-MRI parameters discriminates IDC from benign masses; it also identifies Luminal A and pathological grade III in IDC patients.

摘要

动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)参数或扩散加权成像(DWI)结果可为乳腺癌提供预后信息。然而,单一MRI技术的准确性并不令人满意。本研究旨在探讨DWI与DCE-MRI参数相结合在鉴别浸润性导管癌(IDC)患者分子亚型中的应用。对82例行乳腺DWI和DCE-MRI检查的IDC患者进行回顾性分析。选取86例良性肿块患者作为良性对照。ADC值、Ktrans、Kep、Ve和iAUC的组合对鉴别IDC患者(与良性对照相比)具有良好能力,曲线下面积(AUC)[95%置信区间(CI)]为0.961(0.935 - 0.987)。基于上述组合的列线图预测模型对IDC概率具有良好的预测价值。ADC值、Ktrans、Kep和iAUC的组合在鉴别IDC患者的病理III级(与I或II级相比)时也具有一定能力[AUC(95%CI):0.698(0.572 - 0.825)]。值得注意的是,不同分子亚型的IDC患者的ADC值(P = 0.010)和Kep(P = 0.043)存在差异。此外,Lumina A型IDC患者的ADC值升高(P < 0.001),但Ktrans(P = 0.037)和Kep(P = 0.004)降低(与其他分子亚型相比)。ADC值、Ktrans、Kep的组合在鉴别IDC患者的Luminal A型(与其他分子亚型相比)时具有可接受的能力[AUC(95%CI):0.845(0.748 - 0.941)]。DWI与DCE-MRI参数相结合可鉴别IDC与良性肿块;还可识别IDC患者中的Luminal A型和病理III级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bc7/11999158/d75ac77c00cb/pone.0320240.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验