• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩散峰度成像与动态对比增强 MRI 对乳腺癌患者预后因素和分子亚型预测的比较。

Comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in prediction of prognostic factors and molecular subtypes in patients with breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272029, China.

Clinical Medical College of Jining Medical University, Jining 272000, China.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2022 Sep;154:110392. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110392. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110392
PMID:35679701
Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore the clinical value of diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for predicting genotypes and prognostic factors of breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 130 female patients with pathologically-confirmed breast cancer and DKI and DCE-MRI data were reviewed retrospectively. Two radiologists independently evaluated mean diffusivity (MD) and mean kurtosis (MK) for the DKI model and volume transfer constant (K), reverse rate constant (Kep), and extracellular extravascular volume ratio (Ve) for the DCE-MRI model for post-processing analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyse the diagnostic efficacies.

RESULTS

MK, K, and Kep values were significantly higher in the high-grade Nottingham prognostic index (NPI) group (NPI ≥ 3.4) than in the low-grade NPI group (NPI < 3.4) (p < 0.01). The K had significantly greater area under ROC curve (AUC) than Kep and MK in predicting the NPI (p = 0.038 and 0.0217, respectively). Higher K, Kep, and MK values were observed in the high Ki-67 expression (≥14%) group than in the low Ki-67 expression (<14%) group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the MK value had better diagnostic performance than the K and Kep values in identifying Ki-67 expression status (p = 0.0097 and 0.0008, respectively). The combined model (MD + MK + K + Ve) had a significantly higher AUC than the single parameters for differentiating between luminal A/B and non-luminal subtypes (p = 0.003, < 0.001, 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). The Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive group had higher MD and Ve values than the other subtype groups (p < 0.05), and the Ve had a sensitivity of 100%. Moreover, the Ve AUC was significantly higher than that for MD in the identification of the triple-negative subtype (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

K of DCE-MRI and MK of DKI demonstrated good diagnostic performance in predicting the prognostic factors of breast cancer. Additionally, the combination of the DCE-MRI and DKI models can improve the efficiency of predicting breast cancer genotypes.

摘要

目的

探讨扩散峰度成像(DKI)和动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)在预测乳腺癌基因型和预后因素方面的临床价值。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了 130 例经病理证实的乳腺癌女性患者的 DKI 和 DCE-MRI 数据。两位放射科医生分别对 DKI 模型的平均弥散度(MD)和平均峰度(MK)以及 DCE-MRI 模型的容积转移常数(K)、反向速率常数(Kep)和细胞外细胞外容积比(Ve)进行后处理分析。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析诊断效能。

结果

高级别诺丁汉预后指数(NPI)组(NPI≥3.4)的 MK、K 和 Kep 值明显高于低级别 NPI 组(NPI<3.4)(p<0.01)。K 在预测 NPI 方面的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)显著大于 Kep 和 MK(p=0.038 和 0.0217)。Ki-67 高表达(≥14%)组的 K、Kep 和 MK 值明显高于 Ki-67 低表达(<14%)组(p<0.05)。此外,MK 值在识别 Ki-67 表达状态方面的诊断性能优于 K 和 Kep 值(p=0.0097 和 0.0008)。MD+MK+K+Ve 联合模型在区分管腔 A/B 和非管腔亚型方面的 AUC 显著高于单一参数(p=0.003,<0.001,0.001 和<0.001)。人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性组的 MD 和 Ve 值明显高于其他亚型组(p<0.05),Ve 值的灵敏度为 100%。此外,Ve 的 AUC 在识别三阴性亚型方面明显高于 MD(p=0.048)。

结论

DCE-MRI 的 K 和 DKI 的 MK 在预测乳腺癌预后因素方面具有良好的诊断性能。此外,DCE-MRI 和 DKI 模型的联合可以提高预测乳腺癌基因型的效率。

相似文献

1
Comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in prediction of prognostic factors and molecular subtypes in patients with breast cancer.扩散峰度成像与动态对比增强 MRI 对乳腺癌患者预后因素和分子亚型预测的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Sep;154:110392. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110392. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Use of diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of breast tumors.应用扩散峰度成像和定量动态对比增强磁共振成像鉴别乳腺肿瘤。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Nov;48(5):1358-1366. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26059. Epub 2018 May 2.
3
Prediction of Prognostic Factors and Genotypes in Patients With Breast Cancer Using Multiple Mathematical Models of MR Diffusion Imaging.使用磁共振扩散成像的多种数学模型预测乳腺癌患者的预后因素和基因型
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 31;12:825264. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.825264. eCollection 2022.
4
Prediction of the Nottingham prognostic index and molecular subtypes of breast cancer through multimodal magnetic resonance imaging.通过多模态磁共振成像预测乳腺癌的诺丁汉预后指数和分子亚型。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 May;108:168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.02.012. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
5
Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.3.0T 磁共振扩散峰度成像在乳腺癌特征性诊断中的应用:与预后因素的相关性研究
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Mar;49(3):845-856. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26249. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
6
XGboost Prediction Model Based on 3.0T Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI BiRADS 4 Masses.基于3.0T扩散峰度成像的XGBoost预测模型提高了MRI BI-RADS 4类肿块的诊断准确性。
Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 17;12:833680. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.833680. eCollection 2022.
7
Use of monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI for the differentiation of spinal tumors.应用单指数扩散加权成像和扩散峰度成像及动态对比增强磁共振成像鉴别脊柱肿瘤。
Eur Spine J. 2020 May;29(5):1112-1120. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06330-w. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
8
The value of diffusion kurtosis imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis of parotid gland tumors.扩散峰度成像及动态对比增强磁共振成像在腮腺肿瘤鉴别诊断中的价值
Gland Surg. 2024 Jul 30;13(7):1254-1268. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-78. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
9
IVIM and DCE-MRI in Predicting Phenotypic Subtypes and Nottingham Prognostic Index of Breast Cancer.IVIM 和 DCE-MRI 预测乳腺癌表型亚型和诺丁汉预后指数。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2024 Apr;34(4):400-406. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2024.04.400.
10
Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging of Invasive Breast Cancer: Correlations With Prognostic Factors and Molecular Subtypes.扩散峰度磁共振成像在浸润性乳腺癌中的应用:与预后因素和分子亚型的相关性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Jul;56(1):110-120. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27999. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Value of Pre-Treatment Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging for Progression-Free Survival Prediction in Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.治疗前扩散峰度成像对晚期鼻咽癌无进展生存期预测的预后价值
Cancer Med. 2025 May;14(9):e70883. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70883.
2
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters combined with diffusion-weighted imaging for discriminating malignant lesions, molecular subtypes, and pathological grades in invasive ductal carcinoma patients.动态对比增强磁共振成像参数联合扩散加权成像用于鉴别浸润性导管癌患者的恶性病变、分子亚型和病理分级
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 15;20(4):e0320240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320240. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluating dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for differentiating HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2-positive breast cancers in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
评估动态对比增强磁共振成像在接受新辅助化疗的患者中鉴别HER2阴性、HER2低表达和HER2阳性乳腺癌的价值。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Feb 25;30(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02188-6.
4
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Skin Pathologies of the Breast-A Feasibility Study.乳腺皮肤病变的扩散加权成像——一项可行性研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Apr 29;14(9):934. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14090934.
5
3D amide proton transfer-weighted imaging may be useful for diagnosing early-stage breast cancer: a prospective monocentric study.3D 酰胺质子转移加权成像可能有助于诊断早期乳腺癌:一项前瞻性单中心研究。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2024 Apr 8;8(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00439-z.
6
Integrated pretreatment diffusion kurtosis imaging and serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels: a biomarker strategy for early assessment of radiotherapy outcomes in cervical cancer.联合预处理扩散峰度成像和血清鳞状细胞癌抗原水平:一种用于早期评估宫颈癌放疗效果的生物标志物策略。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 May;49(5):1502-1511. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04270-3. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
7
Multi-contrast learning-guided lightweight few-shot learning scheme for predicting breast cancer molecular subtypes.多对比度学习引导的轻量级少样本学习方案,用于预测乳腺癌分子亚型。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024 May;62(5):1601-1613. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03031-0. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
8
Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhance MRI parameters for rectal carcinoma characterization: correlation with tumor tissue composition.定量动态对比增强 MRI 参数在直肠癌特征描述中的应用:与肿瘤组织成分的相关性。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep 26;21(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03193-5.