Silva Sarah Nascimento, Galvão Endi Lanza, Carvalho Janaína de Pina, Moreira Mayra Soares, Machado de Assis Tália Santana, Cota Glaucia
Pesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas em Doenças Infecto-Parasitárias, Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Brazil.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Apr 15;19(4):e0013020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013020. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Healthcare expenses represent a proportionally greater burden for the poorest populations, which further exacerbates the negative impact of the disease on the individual's quality of life and productivity.
The study aimed to identify the direct and indirect costs during the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) from the patients' perspective and examine factors influencing the costs burden among CL patients.
A prospective cost analysis was conducted between April 2022 and April 2023 through interviews with patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CL. Direct costs were estimated using the micro-costing approach, and indirect costs using the human capital method. Descriptive analyses and hypothesis tests were conducted for associations between costs and sociodemographic and clinical variables, with a significance level of 5%.
The study included 68 patients, predominantly male (77.9%) with an average age of 53 years. Cutaneous leishmaniasis was the most common clinical form (76.4%), with new cases accounting for 79.4% of participants. Patients averaged 3.5 outpatient visits per CL treatment cycle, with miltefosine and intravenous meglumine antimoniate being the most prescribed therapies. Direct costs per treatment cycle averaged USD 117.36, attributed to transportation, food, and medical exams. Indirect costs from lost workdays amounted to USD 9,936.58, with an average of USD 160.12 per patient. Catastrophic expenditure (>10% of monthly income) was observed in 42.6% of families, significantly associated with direct cost, bacterial infection, and sociodemographic factors such as gender, age, and distance traveled.
This study underscores the substantial economic burden of CL treatment on patients, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to mitigate financial hardship, particularly among vulnerable socioeconomic groups.
医疗费用对最贫困人群而言负担比例更大,这进一步加剧了疾病对个人生活质量和生产力的负面影响。
本研究旨在从患者角度确定皮肤利什曼病(CL)治疗期间的直接和间接成本,并研究影响CL患者成本负担的因素。
2022年4月至2023年4月期间,通过对确诊为CL的患者进行访谈,开展了一项前瞻性成本分析。直接成本采用微观成本法估算,间接成本采用人力资本法估算。对成本与社会人口统计学和临床变量之间的关联进行描述性分析和假设检验,显著性水平为5%。
该研究纳入了68名患者,以男性为主(77.9%),平均年龄53岁。皮肤利什曼病是最常见的临床类型(76.4%),新发病例占参与者的79.4%。每位CL患者治疗周期平均门诊就诊3.5次,最常开具的治疗药物为米替福新和静脉注射葡甲胺锑酸盐。每个治疗周期的直接成本平均为117.36美元,主要用于交通、食品和医学检查。工作日损失导致的间接成本为9936.58美元,每位患者平均为160.12美元。42.6%的家庭出现灾难性支出(>月收入的10%),这与直接成本、细菌感染以及性别、年龄和出行距离等社会人口统计学因素显著相关。
本研究强调了CL治疗给患者带来的巨大经济负担,凸显了采取针对性干预措施以减轻经济困难的必要性,尤其是在社会经济弱势群体中。