• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil.估算巴西粘膜利什曼病治疗的直接费用。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2021 Jan 29;54:e04542020. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0454-2020. eCollection 2021.
2
Cost-effectiveness study of therapeutic approaches for mucosal leishmaniasis.黏膜利什曼病治疗方法的成本效益研究。
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 Aug 19;40(8):e00132523. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN132523. eCollection 2024.
3
Successful treatment by adding thalidomide to meglumine antimoniate in a case of refractory anthroponotic mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.沙利度胺联合葡甲胺锑治疗难治性人源皮肤黏膜利什曼病 1 例
Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2019 Dec;11:177-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
4
The direct costs of treating human visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil.巴西治疗人类内脏利什曼病的直接成本。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2017 Jul-Aug;50(4):478-482. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0133-2017.
5
Treatment for human visceral leishmaniasis: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Brazil.巴西内脏利什曼病的治疗:成本效益分析。
Trop Med Int Health. 2019 Sep;24(9):1064-1077. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13284. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
Refractory mucocutaneous leishmaniasis resolved with combination treatment based on intravenous pentamidine, oral azole, aerosolized liposomal amphotericin B, and intralesional meglumine antimoniate.难治性黏膜皮肤利什曼病采用静脉注射戊烷脒、口服唑类药物、雾化脂质体两性霉素 B 和病灶内注射葡甲胺锑治疗后得到缓解。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;97:204-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
7
Cost-effectiveness of meglumine antimoniate versus miltefosine caregiver DOT for the treatment of pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis.葡甲胺锑酸盐与米替福新照顾者直接观察治疗法治疗儿童皮肤利什曼病的成本效益分析
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Apr 6;11(4):e0005459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005459. eCollection 2017 Apr.
8
[Miltefosine versus meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis].[米替福新与葡甲胺锑酸盐治疗黏膜利什曼病的对比研究]
Medicina (B Aires). 2014;74(5):371-7.
9
A randomized, open-label clinical trial comparing the long-term effects of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for mucosal leishmaniasis.一项比较米替福新和葡甲胺锑酸盐治疗黏膜利什曼病长期疗效的随机、开放标签临床试验。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2019 Mar 28;52:e20180292. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0292-2018.
10
Cost-effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B in hospitalised patients with mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.脂质体两性霉素B治疗住院皮肤黏膜利什曼病患者的成本效益
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Dec;22(12):1569-1578. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12996. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Mutual Role of Patients and the Healthcare System in the Control of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.患者与医疗保健系统在皮肤利什曼病控制中的相互作用
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2023 Aug 26;2023:7814940. doi: 10.1155/2023/7814940. eCollection 2023.
2
The burden of out-of-pocket and indirect costs of cutaneous leishmaniasis patients in Minas Gerais, Brazil.巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州皮肤利什曼病患者的自付费用和间接成本负担。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Apr 15;19(4):e0013020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013020. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Leishmaniases: Strategies in treatment development.利什曼病:治疗研发策略
Parasite. 2025;32:18. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2025009. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
4
Progress in antileishmanial drugs: Mechanisms, challenges, and prospects.抗利什曼原虫药物的进展:作用机制、挑战与前景
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Jan 3;19(1):e0012735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012735. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Cost-effectiveness study of therapeutic approaches for mucosal leishmaniasis.黏膜利什曼病治疗方法的成本效益研究。
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 Aug 19;40(8):e00132523. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN132523. eCollection 2024.
6
Mebendazole Inhibits In Vitro Growth and Decreases Mitochondrion and Cytoskeleton Protein Levels.甲苯咪唑抑制体外生长并降低线粒体和细胞骨架蛋白水平。
J Fungi (Basel). 2023 Mar 21;9(3):385. doi: 10.3390/jof9030385.
7
Thermo and Photoresponsive Emulgel Loaded with Ducke and Chlorophylls: Rheological, Mechanical, Photodynamic and Drug Delivery Properties in Human Skin.负载杜氏藻和叶绿素的热响应与光响应乳化凝胶:在人体皮肤中的流变学、力学、光动力学及药物递送特性
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Dec 14;14(12):2798. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14122798.
8
A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial: Oral Miltefosine and Pentavalent Antimonials Associated With Pentoxifylline for the Treatment of American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis.一项随机临床试验:米替福新联合五价锑剂与己酮可可碱治疗美洲皮肤利什曼病。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Jul 1;11:700323. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.700323. eCollection 2021.
9
Economic evaluations addressing diagnosis and treatment strategies for neglected tropical diseases: an overview.经济评估解决被忽视热带病的诊断和治疗策略:概述。
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2021 May 24;63:e41. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946202163041. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative study on liposomal amphotericin B and other therapies in the treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis: A 15-year retrospective cohort study.脂质体两性霉素 B 与其他疗法治疗黏膜利什曼病的对比研究:一项 15 年回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 26;14(6):e0218786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218786. eCollection 2019.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic-therapeutic strategies for visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil.巴西内脏利什曼病诊断治疗策略的成本效益分析
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2019 Apr 11;52:e20180272. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0272-2018.
3
Leishmaniasis.利什曼病。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 15;392(10151):951-970. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31204-2. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
4
Mucosal leishmaniasis: urgent need for more research.黏膜利什曼病:迫切需要更多研究。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2018 Jan-Feb;51(1):120-121. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0463-2017.
5
Budgetary impact of diagnostic tests for visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil.巴西内脏利什曼病诊断检测的预算影响
Cad Saude Publica. 2017 Dec 18;33(12):e00142416. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00142416.
6
Cost-effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B in hospitalised patients with mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.脂质体两性霉素B治疗住院皮肤黏膜利什曼病患者的成本效益
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Dec;22(12):1569-1578. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12996. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
7
Cost of visceral leishmaniasis care in Brazil.巴西内脏利什曼病的治疗成本。
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Dec;22(12):1579-1589. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12994. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
The direct costs of treating human visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil.巴西治疗人类内脏利什曼病的直接成本。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2017 Jul-Aug;50(4):478-482. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0133-2017.
9
[Identifying, measuring and valuing health costs].[确定、衡量和评估健康成本]
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2016 Apr-Jun;25(2):437-439. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742016000200023.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic tests for human visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil.巴西人体内脏利什曼病诊断检测的成本效益分析。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Aug;110(8):464-71. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trw050. Epub 2016 Sep 12.

估算巴西粘膜利什曼病治疗的直接费用。

Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil.

机构信息

Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto René Rachou, Grupo de Pesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais, Campus Contagem, Contagem, MG, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2021 Jan 29;54:e04542020. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0454-2020. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1590/0037-8682-0454-2020
PMID:33533816
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7849328/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) using three therapeutic approaches in the Brazilian context.

METHODS

We performed this economic assessment from the perspective of the Brazilian public healthcare system. The following therapeutic approaches were evaluated: meglumine antimoniate, liposomal amphotericin B, and miltefosine. Direct medical costs were estimated considering four treatment components: a) drug, b) combined medical products, c) procedures, and d) complementary tests.

RESULTS

Treatment with meglumine antimoniate had the lowest average cost per patient (US$ 167.66), followed by miltefosine (US$ 259.92) in the outpatient treatment regimen. The average cost of treatment with liposomal amphotericin B was US$ 715.35 both in inpatient regimen. In all estimates, the drugs accounted for more than 60% of the total cost for each treatment approach.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate the marked differences in costs between the therapeutic alternatives for ML. In addition to efficacy rates and costs related to adverse events, our data have the potential to support a complete cost-effectiveness study in the future. Complete analyses comparing costs and benefits for interventions will assist health managers in choosing drugs for ML treatment in Brazil as well as in establishing effective public health policies.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在估计巴西黏膜利什曼病(ML)三种治疗方法的治疗直接医疗成本。

方法

我们从巴西公共医疗保健系统的角度进行了这项经济评估。评估了以下治疗方法:葡甲胺锑、脂质体两性霉素 B 和米替福新。直接医疗成本的估计考虑了四个治疗组成部分:a)药物、b)联合医疗产品、c)程序和 d)补充测试。

结果

葡甲胺锑治疗的每位患者平均成本最低(167.66 美元),门诊治疗方案中的米替福新(259.92 美元)次之。住院治疗方案中,脂质体两性霉素 B 的平均治疗成本为 715.35 美元。在所有估计中,药物占每种治疗方法总成本的 60%以上。

结论

这些结果表明 ML 治疗的替代方案之间存在显著的成本差异。除了疗效率和与不良反应相关的成本外,我们的数据还有可能支持未来进行全面的成本效益研究。比较干预措施成本和效益的完整分析将有助于卫生管理人员在巴西选择 ML 治疗药物,并制定有效的公共卫生政策。