Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto René Rachou, Grupo de Pesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais, Campus Contagem, Contagem, MG, Brasil.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2021 Jan 29;54:e04542020. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0454-2020. eCollection 2021.
The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) using three therapeutic approaches in the Brazilian context.
We performed this economic assessment from the perspective of the Brazilian public healthcare system. The following therapeutic approaches were evaluated: meglumine antimoniate, liposomal amphotericin B, and miltefosine. Direct medical costs were estimated considering four treatment components: a) drug, b) combined medical products, c) procedures, and d) complementary tests.
Treatment with meglumine antimoniate had the lowest average cost per patient (US$ 167.66), followed by miltefosine (US$ 259.92) in the outpatient treatment regimen. The average cost of treatment with liposomal amphotericin B was US$ 715.35 both in inpatient regimen. In all estimates, the drugs accounted for more than 60% of the total cost for each treatment approach.
These results demonstrate the marked differences in costs between the therapeutic alternatives for ML. In addition to efficacy rates and costs related to adverse events, our data have the potential to support a complete cost-effectiveness study in the future. Complete analyses comparing costs and benefits for interventions will assist health managers in choosing drugs for ML treatment in Brazil as well as in establishing effective public health policies.
本研究旨在估计巴西黏膜利什曼病(ML)三种治疗方法的治疗直接医疗成本。
我们从巴西公共医疗保健系统的角度进行了这项经济评估。评估了以下治疗方法:葡甲胺锑、脂质体两性霉素 B 和米替福新。直接医疗成本的估计考虑了四个治疗组成部分:a)药物、b)联合医疗产品、c)程序和 d)补充测试。
葡甲胺锑治疗的每位患者平均成本最低(167.66 美元),门诊治疗方案中的米替福新(259.92 美元)次之。住院治疗方案中,脂质体两性霉素 B 的平均治疗成本为 715.35 美元。在所有估计中,药物占每种治疗方法总成本的 60%以上。
这些结果表明 ML 治疗的替代方案之间存在显著的成本差异。除了疗效率和与不良反应相关的成本外,我们的数据还有可能支持未来进行全面的成本效益研究。比较干预措施成本和效益的完整分析将有助于卫生管理人员在巴西选择 ML 治疗药物,并制定有效的公共卫生政策。