Suppr超能文献

估算巴西粘膜利什曼病治疗的直接费用。

Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil.

机构信息

Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto René Rachou, Grupo de Pesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais, Campus Contagem, Contagem, MG, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2021 Jan 29;54:e04542020. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0454-2020. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) using three therapeutic approaches in the Brazilian context.

METHODS

We performed this economic assessment from the perspective of the Brazilian public healthcare system. The following therapeutic approaches were evaluated: meglumine antimoniate, liposomal amphotericin B, and miltefosine. Direct medical costs were estimated considering four treatment components: a) drug, b) combined medical products, c) procedures, and d) complementary tests.

RESULTS

Treatment with meglumine antimoniate had the lowest average cost per patient (US$ 167.66), followed by miltefosine (US$ 259.92) in the outpatient treatment regimen. The average cost of treatment with liposomal amphotericin B was US$ 715.35 both in inpatient regimen. In all estimates, the drugs accounted for more than 60% of the total cost for each treatment approach.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate the marked differences in costs between the therapeutic alternatives for ML. In addition to efficacy rates and costs related to adverse events, our data have the potential to support a complete cost-effectiveness study in the future. Complete analyses comparing costs and benefits for interventions will assist health managers in choosing drugs for ML treatment in Brazil as well as in establishing effective public health policies.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在估计巴西黏膜利什曼病(ML)三种治疗方法的治疗直接医疗成本。

方法

我们从巴西公共医疗保健系统的角度进行了这项经济评估。评估了以下治疗方法:葡甲胺锑、脂质体两性霉素 B 和米替福新。直接医疗成本的估计考虑了四个治疗组成部分:a)药物、b)联合医疗产品、c)程序和 d)补充测试。

结果

葡甲胺锑治疗的每位患者平均成本最低(167.66 美元),门诊治疗方案中的米替福新(259.92 美元)次之。住院治疗方案中,脂质体两性霉素 B 的平均治疗成本为 715.35 美元。在所有估计中,药物占每种治疗方法总成本的 60%以上。

结论

这些结果表明 ML 治疗的替代方案之间存在显著的成本差异。除了疗效率和与不良反应相关的成本外,我们的数据还有可能支持未来进行全面的成本效益研究。比较干预措施成本和效益的完整分析将有助于卫生管理人员在巴西选择 ML 治疗药物,并制定有效的公共卫生政策。

相似文献

1
Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil.估算巴西粘膜利什曼病治疗的直接费用。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2021 Jan 29;54:e04542020. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0454-2020. eCollection 2021.
2
Cost-effectiveness study of therapeutic approaches for mucosal leishmaniasis.黏膜利什曼病治疗方法的成本效益研究。
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 Aug 19;40(8):e00132523. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN132523. eCollection 2024.
4
The direct costs of treating human visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil.巴西治疗人类内脏利什曼病的直接成本。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2017 Jul-Aug;50(4):478-482. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0133-2017.

引用本文的文献

3
Leishmaniases: Strategies in treatment development.利什曼病:治疗研发策略
Parasite. 2025;32:18. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2025009. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
4
Progress in antileishmanial drugs: Mechanisms, challenges, and prospects.抗利什曼原虫药物的进展:作用机制、挑战与前景
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Jan 3;19(1):e0012735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012735. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Cost-effectiveness study of therapeutic approaches for mucosal leishmaniasis.黏膜利什曼病治疗方法的成本效益研究。
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 Aug 19;40(8):e00132523. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN132523. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

3
Leishmaniasis.利什曼病。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 15;392(10151):951-970. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31204-2. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
4
Mucosal leishmaniasis: urgent need for more research.黏膜利什曼病:迫切需要更多研究。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2018 Jan-Feb;51(1):120-121. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0463-2017.
7
Cost of visceral leishmaniasis care in Brazil.巴西内脏利什曼病的治疗成本。
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Dec;22(12):1579-1589. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12994. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
The direct costs of treating human visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil.巴西治疗人类内脏利什曼病的直接成本。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2017 Jul-Aug;50(4):478-482. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0133-2017.
9
[Identifying, measuring and valuing health costs].[确定、衡量和评估健康成本]
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2016 Apr-Jun;25(2):437-439. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742016000200023.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验