Lawrence Wayne R, Freedman Neal D, McGee-Avila Jennifer K, Hong Hyokyoung G, Gomez Scarlett L, Loehrer Andrew P, Beyer Kirsten M M, Zhou Yuhong, Magnani Jared W, Neighbors Harold W, Johnson Jarrett A, Lin Ziqiang, Davidoff Amy J, Llanos Adana A M, Shiels Meredith S
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Cancer. 2025 Apr 15;131(8):e35850. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35850.
Mortgage lending bias is a critical driver of residential segregation, and may contribute to disparities in cancer survival. This study investigated the association between contemporary redlining and racial lending bias and prostate cancer survival.
This cohort study used a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database that included 34,163 Black and White men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2010 and 2013. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data were used to calculate the census-tract redlining index (the systematic denial of mortgages based on property location) and racial lending bias index (the systematic denial of a mortgage application for a Black applicant compared with a White applicant in the local area). Both indices were assessed continuously and categorically (low, moderate, or high). Multivariable-adjusted Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for prostate cancer-specific and all-cause mortality.
Overall, as the redlining index increased, men experienced poorer prostate cancer survival. Compared to men residing in low-redlined neighborhoods, those in high-redlined neighborhoods had an increased risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (HR, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.42) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.17-1.34). Similar results were observed for redlining in a race-stratified analysis among Black and White men. Among White men, compared with those residing in low racial lending bias neighborhoods, those in high racial lending bias neighborhoods had an increased all-cause mortality risk (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21).
Contemporary redlining was associated with poorer prostate cancer survival in the overall population. However, an association between racial lending bias and elevated mortality was only observed among White men. Findings suggest that mortgage lending discrimination may contribute to disparities in prostate cancer survival.
抵押贷款偏见是居住隔离的一个关键驱动因素,可能导致癌症生存率的差异。本研究调查了当代红线划定与种族贷款偏见和前列腺癌生存率之间的关联。
这项队列研究使用了监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险数据库,该数据库纳入了2010年至2013年间被诊断患有前列腺癌的34163名黑人和白人男性。《住房抵押贷款披露法》的数据被用于计算普查区红线划定指数(基于房产位置对抵押贷款的系统性拒绝)和种族贷款偏见指数(与当地白人申请人相比,黑人申请人的抵押贷款申请被系统性拒绝)。两个指数均进行了连续和分类评估(低、中或高)。多变量调整的Cox模型用于估计前列腺癌特异性死亡率和全因死亡率的风险比(HR)。
总体而言,随着红线划定指数的增加,男性的前列腺癌生存率较差。与居住在红线划定程度低的社区的男性相比,居住在红线划定程度高的社区的男性前列腺癌特异性死亡率(HR,1.21;95%置信区间[CI],1.03-1.42)和全因死亡率(HR,1.25;95%CI,1.17-1.34)风险增加。在黑人和白人男性的种族分层分析中,红线划定也观察到了类似结果。在白人男性中,与居住在种族贷款偏见程度低的社区的男性相比,居住在种族贷款偏见程度高的社区的男性全因死亡风险增加(HR,1.11;95%CI,1.03-1.21)。
当代红线划定与总体人群中较差的前列腺癌生存率相关。然而,仅在白人男性中观察到种族贷款偏见与死亡率升高之间的关联。研究结果表明,抵押贷款歧视可能导致前列腺癌生存率的差异。