Latack Brooke C, Carvalho Pedro H V, Moura Gustavo A B, Zinn Richard A
Cooperative Extension, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Holtville, CA 92250, USA.
AgNext - Department of Animal Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 4;103. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf113.
The objective of the current study was to determine the influence of biochar supplementation on steer growth performance, carcass characteristics, and ruminal temperature of calf-fed Angus × Holstein (AXH) crossbred steers versus calf-fed Charolais × Holstein (CXH) crossbred steers fed for over 300 d. Fifty-six AXH crossbred steers (body weight (BW) = 192 ± 12 kg), and 56 CHX steers (BW = 188 ± 13 kg) were blocked by initial BW and assigned randomly to 28 pens. Dietary treatments consisted of a steam-flaked corn-based diet supplemented with 1) no biochar supplementation (control); 2) 0.2% (dry matter (DM) basis) of Biochar. Data were analyzed as a randomized complete block in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement, using pens as the experimental unit. From 112 to 224 d on feed, dietary supplemental biochar decreased (P = 0.05) cattle average daily gain (ADG). However, there were no other dietary effects (P ≥ 0.11) on steer growth performance or performance-adjusted net energy values. Biochar supplementation tended (P ≥ 0.08) to decrease the marbling score and increase calf morbidity. Biochar had no other effects (P > 0.13) on carcass characteristics. Angus cross steers had a greater (P ≤ 0.05) final live weight and DM intake compared to CXH steers. Moreover, AXH steers tended (P = 0.09) to have overall ADG, and had a 9.4% greater (P = 0.03) overall ADG in the last 78 d compared to CXH. There were no differences (P ≥ 0.44) between breeds for gain efficiency or net energy for maintenance or gain based on growth performance. Charolais cross steers had the lesser (P ≤ 0.04) average ruminal temperature during the months of June, July, August, and November, while there were no ruminal temperature differences in September and October (P > 0.10). Angus cross steers demonstrated an increase (P ≤ 0.04) in kidney, pelvic, and heart fat, backfat thickness, marbling, and yield grade compared to CXH; however, CXH had a larger (P = 0.01) longissimus muscle area. There were no other differences (P ≥ 0.11) in carcass characteristics, health, or liver abscesses between breeds. Results indicate that biochar supplementation at 0.20% (DM basis) did not affect growth performance or carcass characteristics; however, breed (Angus vs. Charolais) used in a beef on dairy cross did affect carcass characteristics, including carcass weight, and muscle and fat deposition; showing the importance of proper breed selection when a beef on dairy crosses production.
本研究的目的是确定添加生物炭对育肥超过300天的犊牛饲养的安格斯×荷斯坦(AXH)杂交阉牛和夏洛莱×荷斯坦(CXH)杂交阉牛的生长性能、胴体特征和瘤胃温度的影响。56头AXH杂交阉牛(体重(BW)=192±12千克)和56头CHX阉牛(BW=188±13千克)按初始体重进行分组,并随机分配到28个栏中。日粮处理包括以蒸汽压片玉米为基础的日粮,添加1)不添加生物炭(对照);2)0.2%(基于干物质(DM))的生物炭。数据采用2×2析因设计的随机完全区组分析,以栏为实验单位。在采食112至224天期间,日粮中添加生物炭使牛的平均日增重(ADG)降低(P=0.05)。然而,在阉牛生长性能或性能调整后的净能量值方面没有其他日粮效应(P≥0.11)。添加生物炭有降低大理石花纹评分和增加犊牛发病率的趋势(P≥0.08)。生物炭对胴体特征没有其他影响(P>0.13)。与CXH阉牛相比,安格斯杂交阉牛的最终活重和干物质摄入量更高(P≤0.05)。此外,AXH阉牛的总体ADG有增加的趋势(P=0.09),并且在最后78天内,其总体ADG比CXH阉牛高9.4%(P=0.03)。基于生长性能,在增重效率、维持或增重净能量方面,两个品种之间没有差异(P≥0.44)。在6月、7月、8月和11月期间,夏洛莱杂交阉牛的平均瘤胃温度较低(P≤0.04),而在9月和10月瘤胃温度没有差异(P>0.10)。与CXH阉牛相比,安格斯杂交阉牛的肾脏、盆腔和心脏脂肪、背膘厚度、大理石花纹和产肉等级有所增加(P≤0.04);然而,CXH阉牛的背最长肌面积更大(P=0.01)。在胴体特征、健康状况或肝脏脓肿方面,两个品种之间没有其他差异(P≥0.11)。结果表明,以0.20%(基于DM)添加生物炭不影响生长性能或胴体特征;然而,用于奶牛杂交的肉牛品种(安格斯与夏洛莱)确实会影响胴体特征,包括胴体重以及肌肉和脂肪沉积;这表明在奶牛杂交肉牛生产中选择合适品种的重要性。