Pradhan Saplin, Priyadarshini Smita R, Panda Saurav, Misra Satya Ranjan, Panigrahi Rajat, Choudhury Basanta Kumar
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan University Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India.
Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan University Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India.
Arch Public Health. 2025 Apr 15;83(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01593-5.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Smokeless tobacco (SLT) use is a global burden, and its long-term use can result in health issues like oral cancers, oral potentially malignant disorders, etc. This review assessed the effectiveness of behavioural and pharmacological interventions for SLT cessation, adding new dimensions to the evidence found earlier in the literature, including recent trials.
Four electronic databases were used in the search: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web-of-Science. Study Selection included randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological and behavioural interventions with or without placebo to help users quit SLT with 3 & 6 months follow-up. Two review writers who separately evaluated abstracts for possible inclusion extracted data from included trials. Mantel-Haenszel's random-effect method was used to assess pooled effects for trial subgroups. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated from the reported odds ratios, confidence intervals and quit rates.
Nineteen, consisting of 4575 participants, fulfilled the requirements to be listed in the review. A significant difference was observed at 6 months for pharmacological versus behavioural intervention with a low heterogeneity at a 95% confidence interval. Pooling the fifteen pharmacotherapy-versus-behavioural modification studies in adults, we discovered that pharmacotherapy had a statistically significant impact on raising quit rates by the conclusion of the follow-up period (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.43; 3271 participants) with low heterogeneity (I = 19%).
Worldwide, there has been minimal data on interventions for SLT cessation, yet the pharmacological interventional methods have been found to be comparatively effective than behavioural intervention. Adequate awareness, health care professionals training, and law implementation are necessary to achieve habit cessation.
Not Applicable. The present systematic review is registered in PROSPERO's International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42023399178 dated 13th Feb 2023).
无烟烟草的使用是一项全球性负担,其长期使用会导致口腔癌、口腔潜在恶性疾病等健康问题。本综述评估了行为干预和药物干预对戒烟的有效性,为早期文献(包括近期试验)中的证据增添了新的维度。
使用了四个电子数据库进行搜索:PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane和Web of Science。研究选择包括随机对照试验(RCT),比较药物干预和行为干预(有无安慰剂),以帮助使用者在3个月和6个月随访期内戒除无烟烟草。两名独立评估摘要以确定是否可能纳入的综述作者从纳入试验中提取数据。采用Mantel-Haenszel随机效应方法评估试验亚组的合并效应。此外,根据报告的优势比、置信区间和戒烟率评估干预的有效性。
19项研究(共4575名参与者)符合纳入本综述的要求。在6个月时,药物干预与行为干预之间观察到显著差异,95%置信区间的异质性较低。汇总15项成人药物治疗与行为改变的研究,我们发现药物治疗在随访期结束时对提高戒烟率有统计学显著影响(优势比1.21,95%置信区间1.03至1.43;3271名参与者),异质性较低(I² = 19%)。
在全球范围内,关于戒烟干预措施的数据极少,但已发现药物干预方法比行为干预相对更有效。要实现戒烟,需要有足够的认识、对医护人员的培训以及法律的实施。
不适用。本系统综述已在PROSPERO的国际系统综述前瞻性注册库注册(注册号CRD42023399178,日期为2023年2月13日)。