Lovelock Catherine E, Duarte Carlos M
School of Environment, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Marine Science Program, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Biol Lett. 2025 Apr;21(4):20240648. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0648. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
In 2019, we found that the concept of blue carbon had begun to solidify in the preceding decade around activities that could achieve mitigation through conservation and restoration and on ecosystems with high levels of data. Five years later, the available data have increased, and so too have the ecosystems that are included in national carbon markets and carbon market methodologies (e.g. seaweed and supratidal forests). While the implementation of blue carbon strategies continues to advance in both the carbon and emerging biodiversity markets, the scale of investment is inadequate for the action needed to meet global targets of the Paris Agreement and Kunming-Global Biodiversity Framework. The developing finance mechanisms for investment in blue natural capital offer additional potential for action on conservation and restoration of blue carbon ecosystems at large scales, although governance systems are challenged to deliver just and equitable outcomes. Blue carbon research and implementation is characterized by deep collaboration among diverse disciplines and actors, which continues to be crucial to achieving conservation and restoration goals.
2019年,我们发现,在前十年里,蓝碳概念已开始围绕通过保护和恢复实现减排的活动以及拥有大量数据的生态系统逐渐成形。五年后,可用数据有所增加,纳入国家碳市场和碳市场方法(如海藻和潮上带森林)的生态系统也增多了。虽然蓝碳战略在碳市场和新兴生物多样性市场的实施都在持续推进,但投资规模仍不足以支持实现《巴黎协定》和《昆明-全球生物多样性框架》全球目标所需的行动。投资蓝色自然资本的发展融资机制为大规模保护和恢复蓝碳生态系统提供了更多行动潜力,尽管治理体系面临着实现公正和平等成果的挑战。蓝碳研究与实施的特点是不同学科和行为体之间的深度合作,这对实现保护和恢复目标仍然至关重要。