Suppr超能文献

经阴道线圈联合盆腔阵列线圈磁共振成像用于宫颈癌术前分期

Endovaginal coil combined with pelvic array coil magnetic resonance imaging for the preoperative staging of cervical cancer.

作者信息

Wu Meixian, Zhang Ke, Li Yingyuan, Yu Bin, Zou Jianzhong, Lv Fajin, Zeng Dingyuan

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Radiology, Liuzhou Hospital, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Liuzhou, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Apr 1;15(4):3189-3197. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-998. Epub 2025 Mar 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate staging of cervical cancer via conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains challenging, suggesting a greater need for coil placement closer to the region of interest. This study aimed to determine the value of 3.0-T MRI with an endovaginal coil combined with the pelvic array coil (combined coil) in the preoperative staging of cervical cancer and its correlation with histopathology.

METHODS

Patients with cervical cancer who received 3.0-T MR scans with the pelvic array coil and combined coil from January 2023 to March 2024 at The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were included in the study. The accuracy of preoperative staging was compared between the two groups with surgical pathological staging as the gold standard, and image features such as parametrial involvement and vaginal invasion were analyzed.

RESULTS

The voxel size value for the pelvic coil was 1.83 (0.78×0.78×3) mm, and that of the combined coil was 0.44 (0.47×0.47×2) mm. The accuracy of combined coil staging was higher than that of the pelvic array coil (85.0% 72.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the pelvic array coil in diagnosing parametrial involvement was 71.4%, 90.9%, 87.5%, 62.5% and 93.7%, respectively; meanwhile, for diagnosing vaginal invasion, they were 86.4%, 88.9%, 87.5%, 90.5%, and 84.2%, respectively. For the combined coil, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV in diagnosing parametrial involvement were 85.7%, 97.0%, 95.0%, 85.7%, and 97.0%, respectively; meanwhile, for diagnosing vaginal invasion, they were 95.5%, 94.4%, 95.0%, 95.5%, and 94.4%, respectively. The combined coil showed a high consistency with postoperative pathology in diagnosing parametrial involvement (κ=0.827) and vaginal invasion (κ=0.899), indicating that the combined coil had superior staging accuracy than did the pelvic array coil.

CONCLUSIONS

The endovaginal coil can improve the high-resolution images of the cervical region while visualizing the lesion size and extent, along with the depth of infiltration of the surrounding tissues. The 3.0-T MRI with an endovaginal coil combined with a pelvic array coil has a high application value in the preoperative staging of cervical cancer. It can also provide an important basis for clinical decision-making.

摘要

背景

通过传统磁共振成像(MRI)对宫颈癌进行准确分期仍然具有挑战性,这表明更需要将线圈放置在更靠近感兴趣区域的位置。本研究旨在确定3.0-T MRI经阴道线圈联合盆腔阵列线圈(联合线圈)在宫颈癌术前分期中的价值及其与组织病理学的相关性。

方法

纳入2023年1月至2024年3月在重庆医科大学附属第一医院接受3.0-T MR扫描的宫颈癌患者,扫描时使用盆腔阵列线圈和联合线圈。以手术病理分期为金标准,比较两组术前分期的准确性,并分析宫旁组织受累和阴道侵犯等图像特征。

结果

盆腔线圈的体素大小值为1.83(0.78×0.78×3)mm,联合线圈的体素大小值为0.44(0.47×0.47×2)mm。联合线圈分期的准确性高于盆腔阵列线圈(85.0%对72.5%)。盆腔阵列线圈诊断宫旁组织受累的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为71.4%、90.9%、87.5%、62.5%和93.7%;同时,诊断阴道侵犯的相应指标分别为86.4%、88.9%、87.5%、90.5%和84.2%。对于联合线圈,诊断宫旁组织受累的敏感性、特异性、准确性、PPV和NPV分别为85.7%、97.0%、95.0%、85.7%和97.0%;同时,诊断阴道侵犯的相应指标分别为95.5%、94.4%、95.0%、95.5%和94.4%。联合线圈在诊断宫旁组织受累(κ=0.827)和阴道侵犯(κ=0.899)方面与术后病理表现出高度一致性,表明联合线圈的分期准确性优于盆腔阵列线圈。

结论

经阴道线圈可提高宫颈区域的高分辨率图像,同时显示病变大小和范围以及周围组织的浸润深度。3.0-T MRI经阴道线圈联合盆腔阵列线圈在宫颈癌术前分期中具有较高的应用价值。它还可为临床决策提供重要依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d50/11994509/9adff633ce95/qims-15-04-3189-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验