Lu Yangni, Zhang Chunlan, Wu Jianlin, Xu Xianli, Lu Ailian, Huang Huiya, Chen Maowei
Department of Infectious Diseases, Wuming Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Department of General Medicine, Wuming Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Infect Drug Resist. 2025 Apr 11;18:1837-1845. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S512047. eCollection 2025.
Compare the diagnostic efficacy of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) with that of four traditional methods in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), and explore the application value of BALF mNGS in the early diagnosis of PTB.
A retrospective analysis was performed on 102 patients with suspected PTB in Wuming Hospital Affiliated with Guangxi Medical University from January 2021 to August 2024, among which 61 cases were PTB and 41 cases were non - PTB. Diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value [PPV/NPV], accuracy) were calculated for BALF mNGS, sputum TB-DNA, sputum acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear, BALF AFB smear, and BALF TB-DNA, using clinical diagnosis as the reference standard.
BALF mNGS demonstrated a sensitivity of 75.41% (46/61), specificity of 87.80% (36/41), PPV of 90.20% (46/51), NPV of 70.59% (36/51), and accuracy of 80.39% (82/102). Its accuracy was significantly higher than sputum-based methods (53.03-58.82%, P < 0.0125) and second only to BALF TB-DNA (84.13%, P > 0.0125). BALF mNGS exhibited superior sensitivity compared to sputum TB-DNA (38.00%), sputum AFB smear (41.67%), and BALF AFB smear (41.50%) (P < 0.0125). While specificity and PPV showed no significant differences among methods, BALF mNGS had a higher NPV than sputum-based assays (53.03-54.17%) but lower than BALF TB-DNA (82.53%, P < 0.0125). Both BALF mNGS (Kappa = 0.608, P < 0.001) and BALF TB-DNA (Kappa = 0.670, P < 0.001) showed strong concordance with clinical diagnosis.
BALF mNGS demonstrates high sensitivity and accuracy for PTB diagnosis, outperforming conventional sputum-based methods. Although BALF TB-DNA achieved the highest specificity and NPV, BALF mNGS serves as a robust supplementary tool, particularly for early-stage or paucibacillary PTB. Integration of these molecular techniques may optimize diagnostic workflows in high-TB-burden settings.
比较支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)与四种传统方法在肺结核(PTB)诊断中的效能,并探讨BALF mNGS在PTB早期诊断中的应用价值。
对2021年1月至2024年8月广西医科大学附属武鸣医院102例疑似PTB患者进行回顾性分析,其中PTB患者61例,非PTB患者41例。以临床诊断为参考标准,计算BALF mNGS、痰结核DNA、痰抗酸杆菌(AFB)涂片、BALF AFB涂片和BALF结核DNA的诊断性能指标(敏感性、特异性、阳性/阴性预测值[PPV/NPV]、准确性)。
BALF mNGS的敏感性为75.41%(46/61),特异性为87.80%(36/41),PPV为90.20%(46/51),NPV为70.59%(36/51),准确性为80.39%(82/102)。其准确性显著高于基于痰液的方法(53.03 - 58.82%,P < 0.0125),仅次于BALF结核DNA(84.13%,P > 0.0125)。与痰结核DNA(38.00%)、痰AFB涂片(41.67%)和BALF AFB涂片(41.50%)相比,BALF mNGS表现出更高的敏感性(P < 0.0125)。虽然各方法间特异性和PPV无显著差异,但BALF mNGS的NPV高于基于痰液的检测方法(53.03 - 54.17%),但低于BALF结核DNA(82.53%,P < 0.0125)。BALF mNGS(Kappa = 0.608,P < 0.001)和BALF结核DNA(Kappa = 0.670,P < 0.001)与临床诊断均具有高度一致性。
BALF mNGS在PTB诊断中具有高敏感性和准确性,优于传统的基于痰液的方法。虽然BALF结核DNA的特异性和NPV最高,但BALF mNGS是一种强大的辅助工具,尤其适用于早期或菌量少的PTB。整合这些分子技术可能会优化高结核负担地区的诊断流程。