Suppr超能文献

宏基因组下一代测序在脓毒症和血流感染中的诊断价值。

Diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in sepsis and bloodstream infection.

机构信息

General ICU, Henan Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Henan Engineering Research Center for Critical Care Medicine, Zhengzhou Key Laboratory of Sepsis, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Cardiopulmonary Support Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Feb 10;13:1117987. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1117987. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in sepsis and bloodstream infection (BSI).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with sepsis and BSI at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2020 to February 2022 was conducted. All the patients underwent blood culture and were divided into mNGS group and non-mNGS group according to whether mNGS was performed or not. The mNGS group was further divided into early group (< 1 day), intermediate group (1-3 days), and late group (> 3 days) according to the time of mNGS inspection.

RESULTS

In 194 patients with sepsis and BSI, the positive rate of mNGS for identifying pathogens was significantly higher than that of blood culture (77.7% vs. 47.9%), and the detection period was shorter (1.41 ± 1.01 days vs. 4.82 ± 0.73 days); the difference was statistically significant ( < 0.05). The 28-day mortality rate of the mNGS group ( = 112) was significantly lower than that of the non-mNGS group ( = 82) (47.32% vs. 62.20%, = 0.043). The total hospitalization time for the mNGS group was longer than that for the non-mNGS group (18 (9, 33) days vs. 13 (6, 23) days, = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the ICU hospitalization time, mechanical ventilation time, vasoactive drug use time, and 90-day mortality between the two groups ( > 0.05). Sub-group analysis of patients in the mNGS group showed that the total hospitalization time and the ICU hospitalization time in the late group were longer than those in the early group (30 (18, 43) days vs. 10 (6, 26) days, 17 (6, 31) days vs. 6 (2, 10) days), and the ICU hospitalization time in the intermediate group was longer than that in the early group (6 (3, 15) days vs. 6 (2, 10) days); the differences were statistically significant ( < 0.05). The 28-day mortality rate of the early group was higher than that of the late group (70.21% vs. 30.00%), and the difference was statistically significant ( = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

mNGS has the advantages of a short detection period and a high positive rate in the diagnosis of pathogens causing BSI and, eventually, sepsis. Routine blood culture combined with mNGS can significantly reduce the mortality of septic patients with BSI. Early detection using mNGS can shorten the total hospitalization time and the ICU hospitalization time of patients with sepsis and BSI.

摘要

目的

评估宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)在脓毒症和血流感染(BSI)中的诊断价值。

方法

回顾性分析 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 2 月在郑州大学第一附属医院诊断为脓毒症和 BSI 的患者。所有患者均进行血培养,并根据是否进行 mNGS 检查将其分为 mNGS 组和非 mNGS 组。mNGS 组根据 mNGS 检查时间进一步分为早期组(<1 天)、中期组(1-3 天)和晚期组(>3 天)。

结果

在 194 例脓毒症和 BSI 患者中,mNGS 识别病原体的阳性率明显高于血培养(77.7% vs. 47.9%),检测时间更短(1.41 ± 1.01 天 vs. 4.82 ± 0.73 天);差异具有统计学意义(<0.05)。mNGS 组(n=112)的 28 天死亡率明显低于非 mNGS 组(n=82)(47.32% vs. 62.20%,=0.043)。mNGS 组的总住院时间长于非 mNGS 组(18(9,33)天 vs. 13(6,23)天,=0.005)。两组 ICU 住院时间、机械通气时间、血管活性药物使用时间和 90 天死亡率差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。mNGS 组患者的亚组分析显示,晚期组的总住院时间和 ICU 住院时间长于早期组(30(18,43)天 vs. 10(6,26)天,17(6,31)天 vs. 6(2,10)天),中期组的 ICU 住院时间长于早期组(6(3,15)天 vs. 6(2,10)天);差异具有统计学意义(<0.05)。早期组的 28 天死亡率高于晚期组(70.21% vs. 30.00%),差异具有统计学意义(=0.001)。

结论

mNGS 在诊断引起 BSI 进而导致脓毒症的病原体方面具有检测周期短、阳性率高的优点。常规血培养联合 mNGS 可显著降低脓毒症合并 BSI 患者的死亡率。早期使用 mNGS 可以缩短脓毒症和 BSI 患者的总住院时间和 ICU 住院时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4c5/9950395/fdbb39993d17/fcimb-13-1117987-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验