Prosperini Luca, Pradelli Lorenzo, Santoni Laura, Perini Daria, Cottone Salvatore, Vercellino Marco
S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
AdRes Health Economics and Outcomes Resources, Turin, Italy.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Apr 11;17:315-333. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S501716. eCollection 2025.
Two analyses, a cost-minimization and a budget impact, were conducted to estimate the economic and financial impact of subcutaneous (SC) vs intravenous (IV) natalizumab in terms of administration times and costs in the Italian setting from the perspective of multiple sclerosis (MS) center, patient, and society.
Cost minimization analysis (CMA) adopted a Markov model with three different states, and it is based on the results of REFINE study and its post-hoc analysis, which evaluated and demonstrated the non-inferiority of natalizumab SC vs IV formulation. The economic inputs came mainly from EASIER study, that estimated the administration time, resource consumption, and costs of natalizumab SC vs IV. A lifetime horizon was considered. Budget impact analysis (BIA) was conducted with a cost calculator approach and compared a base scenario (without SC natalizumab) with an alternative scenario (with SC natalizumab). The inputs were shared with the CMA and a 3-year time horizon was considered. A progressive increase in the number of patients treated with natalizumab SC was estimated from the 1st to the 2nd to the 3rd year after reimbursement in Italy.
CMA estimated that savings due to the use of SC instead of IV natalizumab would be €2,824, €1,137, and €9,170 per patient from the perspectives of MS center, patient, and society, respectively, thus depicting a weak dominance (lower costs and non-inferiority efficacy). BIA estimated that the savings were approximately 3.2 million euros from the perspective of MS centers and around 10.3 million euros from the perspective of society in the first 3 years following reimbursement.
Administering natalizumab subcutaneously rather than intravenously to treatment-eligible patients would result in administration time and cost savings thus determining a favorable impact for the MS center, the patient and the society.
进行了两项分析,即成本最小化分析和预算影响分析,从多发性硬化症(MS)中心、患者和社会的角度,在意大利背景下,就给药时间和成本估算皮下注射(SC)与静脉注射(IV)那他珠单抗的经济和财务影响。
成本最小化分析(CMA)采用了具有三种不同状态的马尔可夫模型,其基于REFINE研究的结果及其事后分析,该研究评估并证明了那他珠单抗SC制剂与IV制剂的非劣效性。经济投入主要来自EASIER研究,该研究估算了那他珠单抗SC与IV的给药时间、资源消耗和成本。考虑了终身视角。预算影响分析(BIA)采用成本计算器方法进行,并将基础方案(无SC那他珠单抗)与替代方案(有SC那他珠单抗)进行比较。输入数据与CMA共享,并考虑了3年的时间范围。预计在意大利报销后的第1年至第2年再到第3年,接受SC那他珠单抗治疗的患者数量将逐步增加。
CMA估计,从MS中心、患者和社会的角度来看,使用SC那他珠单抗而非IV那他珠单抗,每位患者分别可节省2824欧元、1137欧元和9170欧元,从而呈现出微弱的优势(成本更低且疗效非劣)。BIA估计,从MS中心的角度来看,报销后的前3年节省约320万欧元,从社会的角度来看约为1030万欧元。
对符合治疗条件的患者皮下注射而非静脉注射那他珠单抗将节省给药时间和成本,从而对MS中心、患者和社会产生有利影响。