Li Jing, Wang Dian, Su Ning, Wang Min, Wang Yulu
Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, P.R. China.
Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, P.R. China.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar 27;22(6):46. doi: 10.3892/mco.2025.2841. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (GEA) usually exhibits notable aggressiveness and resistance to current therapies. A high expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) was previous reported in GEA and indicated it might benefit from immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1. In the present study, the efficacy of immunotherapy in a panel of patients with GEA was explored, aiming to provide the first-hand evidence on this topic. A total of 44 pathologically diagnosed patients with GEA were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and the Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University. The clinical and pathological information including age, tumor stage, treatments and prognosis were retrieved from our medical records system. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to evaluate the role of immunotherapy on patients' overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). According to the treatments, patients with GEA were divided into two groups: The immunotherapy group (n=19) and the non-immunotherapy group (n=25, the control group). In the immunotherapy group, 9 patients received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as part of their primary treatment, while the remaining 10 received it after tumor recurrence/metastasis. Compared with the control group, the use of immunotherapy during primary treatment significantly extended PFS (median PFS: 14 vs. 6 months, P=0.004) and OS (median OS: 24 vs. 16 months, P=0.019). However, in the 10 patients who initiated immunotherapy after tumor recurrence/metastasis, the survival benefits were only observed for OS (median OS: 33.5 vs. 16 months, P=0.013) but not PFS. Furthermore, the efficacy of immunotherapy was more significant in patients with PD-L1-positive GEA than those PD-L1-negative cases, which improved both the PFS (median PFS: 17 vs. 7 months, P=0.002) and OS (median OS: 36 vs. 16 months, P<0.001). This is the first study, to the best of our knowledge, reporting the efficacy of immunotherapy for GEA. It was demonstrated that the earlier use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was significantly associated with an improved prognosis, and PD-L1 status could predict the response of immunotherapy. These preliminary findings warrant further validations in the future.
胃型宫颈腺癌(GEA)通常表现出显著的侵袭性以及对当前治疗的耐药性。此前有报道称GEA中程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)高表达,这表明其可能从靶向程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)/PD-L1的免疫治疗中获益。在本研究中,探讨了免疫治疗对一组GEA患者的疗效,旨在提供关于该主题的第一手证据。从郑州大学第一附属医院和郑州大学肿瘤医院招募了44例经病理诊断的GEA患者。从我们的病历系统中检索了包括年龄、肿瘤分期、治疗方法和预后等临床和病理信息。采用Kaplan-Meier分析来评估免疫治疗对患者总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的作用。根据治疗方法,将GEA患者分为两组:免疫治疗组(n = 19)和非免疫治疗组(n = 25,对照组)。在免疫治疗组中,9例患者在其初始治疗中接受了PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂,而其余10例在肿瘤复发/转移后接受了该治疗。与对照组相比,在初始治疗期间使用免疫治疗显著延长了PFS(中位PFS:14个月对6个月,P = 0.004)和OS(中位OS:24个月对16个月,P = 0.019)。然而,在10例肿瘤复发/转移后开始免疫治疗的患者中,仅在OS方面观察到生存获益(中位OS:33.5个月对16个月,P = 0.013),而在PFS方面未观察到。此外,免疫治疗在PD-L1阳性的GEA患者中的疗效比PD-L1阴性患者更显著,这改善了PFS(中位PFS:17个月对7个月,P = 0.002)和OS(中位OS:36个月对16个月,P < 0.001)。据我们所知,这是第一项报道免疫治疗对GEA疗效的研究。结果表明,更早使用PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂与改善预后显著相关,且PD-L1状态可预测免疫治疗的反应。这些初步发现有待未来进一步验证。