Suppr超能文献

将自动峰值频率标注与电压标测相结合以识别室性心动过速消融部位。

Integration of automated peak frequency annotation with voltage mapping for identifying ventricular tachycardia ablation sites.

作者信息

Onder Sukriye Ebru, Guler Tumer Erdem, Bozyel Serdar, Cagdas Metin, Dalgic Sadiye Nur, Sipal Abdulcebbar, Gecer Samet, Kılıc Emre, Santangeli Pasquale, Aksu Tolga

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Health Sciences University, Kocaeli City Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Bioritim Sağlık Hizmetleri, Bursa, Turkey.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s10840-025-02045-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peak frequency (PF) analysis has emerged as a novel tool for identifying arrhythmogenic substrates in ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation, particularly when combined with traditional substrate mapping techniques such as voltage mapping and Isochronal Late Activation Mapping (ILAM). This study evaluates the utility of PF analysis in scarred myocardial regions, with a focus on areas containing manually annotated late potentials (LPs).

METHODS

Electroanatomical mapping using the EnSite X™ system was performed in 20 patients undergoing VT ablation. PF analysis was applied to scarred regions with voltages < 1.5 mV, with and without LPs, to identify zones of high-frequency activity. PF zones (PFZs) were compared to voltage maps and ILAM to assess spatial correlation with deceleration zones (DZs) and their role in defining ablation targets.

RESULTS

Peak frequency distributions differed significantly across myocardium conditions (H = 254.92, p < 0.0001). The median peak frequency was 120.0 Hz (77.3-179.0 Hz) in normal voltage myocardium, 145.0 Hz (100.0-194.3 Hz) in low-voltage myocardium without LPs, and 291.0 Hz (190.3-380.3 Hz) in low-voltage myocardium with LPs. Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences: normal voltage vs. low voltage without LPs (U = 46,455.0; p = 0.0019), normal voltage vs. low voltage with LPs (U = 20,935.5; p < 0.0001), and low voltage without LPs vs. low voltage with LPs (U = 19,548.0; p < 0.0001). PFZs exhibited strong colocalization with DZs identified via ILAM, with > 50% spatial overlap in most cases. The automated peak frequency annotation algorithm demonstrated high reproducibility, significantly reducing operator dependency compared to manual annotation.

CONCLUSION

PF analysis provides a robust and reproducible method for identifying arrhythmogenic substrates in VT ablation. When integrated with voltage mapping and ILAM, it facilitates precise localization of critical ablation targets, particularly in regions with LPs. These findings highlight the potential of PF analysis to enhance the efficacy of substrate-based ablation strategies.

摘要

背景

峰值频率(PF)分析已成为一种用于识别室性心动过速(VT)消融中致心律失常基质的新型工具,尤其是与传统基质标测技术(如电压标测和等时晚激活标测(ILAM))相结合时。本研究评估了PF分析在瘢痕心肌区域的实用性,重点关注包含手动标注的晚电位(LPs)的区域。

方法

对20例接受VT消融的患者使用EnSite X™系统进行电解剖标测。将PF分析应用于电压<1.5 mV的瘢痕区域,无论有无LPs,以识别高频活动区域。将PF区(PFZs)与电压图和ILAM进行比较,以评估与减速区(DZs)的空间相关性及其在确定消融靶点中的作用。

结果

不同心肌条件下的峰值频率分布存在显著差异(H = 254.92,p < 0.0001)。正常电压心肌的中位峰值频率为120.0 Hz(77.3 - 179.0 Hz),无LPs的低电压心肌为145.0 Hz(100.0 - 194.3 Hz),有LPs的低电压心肌为291.0 Hz(190.3 - 380.3 Hz)。两两比较显示存在显著差异:正常电压与无LPs的低电压(U = 46,455.0;p = 0.0019),正常电压与有LPs的低电压(U = 20,935.5;p < 0.0001),无LPs的低电压与有LPs的低电压(U = 19,548.0;p < 0.0001)。PFZs与通过ILAM识别的DZs表现出强烈的共定位,大多数情况下空间重叠>50%。自动峰值频率标注算法显示出高重现性,与手动标注相比显著降低了操作者依赖性。

结论

PF分析为识别VT消融中的致心律失常基质提供了一种可靠且可重复的方法。与电压标测和ILAM相结合时,它有助于精确确定关键消融靶点的位置,尤其是在有LPs的区域。这些发现凸显了PF分析增强基于基质的消融策略疗效的潜力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验