Baker Valerie L, Dyer Silke, Chambers Georgina M, Keller Elena, Banker Manish, de Mouzon Jacques, Elgindy Eman, Bai Fu M, Ishihara Osamu, Jwa Seung Chik, Kupka Markus S, Zegers-Hochschild Fernando, Adamson G David
Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Lutherville, Maryland, USA.
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Groote Schuur Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf049.
What were the rates of utilization, effectiveness, and safety for assisted reproductive technology (ART) throughout the world in 2017 and 2018, and what trends were observed?
The total reported number of ART fresh and frozen cycles conducted in 83 participating countries was 2 913 498 in 2017 and 3 303 505 in 2018, with 5-year trends including an increasing proportion of cycles utilizing frozen embryo transfer (FET) and an increasing number of cycles utilizing pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT).
Prior reports from the International Committee Monitoring ART (ICMART) have reported on the utilization, effectiveness, and safety of ART from participating countries, with an increase in the number of cycles and number of participating countries over time. These reports have described regional differences in the utilization of ART overall, as well as differences in the utilization of specific practices such as ICSI, PGT and single embryo transfer. Past reports demonstrated that rates of delivery per cycle have increased and rates of multiple gestations have decreased over time.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective, cross-sectional survey describes ART procedures performed globally in 2017 and 2018. Data were submitted to ICMART by participating countries from national or regional registries.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: There were 83 countries which provided data for cycles performed in 2017 or 2018, with the majority of countries providing data for both years. Aggregate data are reported for each participating country and analysed using methods developed by ICMART to calculate measures of utilization, effectiveness, and safety.
A total of 2 913 498 cycles and 671 012 babies born were reported for treatment performed in 2017, increasing to 3 303 505 cycles and 728 383 babies born for treatment performed in 2018. After imputing data for non-reporting centres in reporting countries, the estimated number of cycles performed in 2017 was 3 107 188 resulting in an estimated 814 588 babies. For 2018, the estimated number of cycles was 3 568 635 resulting in an estimated 870 814 babies. Utilization of ICSI for autologous fresh non-PGT cycles declined slightly compared with 2014 (54.6% in 2017 and 57.3% in 2018 compared with 64.8% in 2014). The percentage of transfers which were of frozen embryos was 55.7 % in 2017 and 57.9% in 2018, up from 38.9% in 2014. Among all countries, including those which reported no 'freeze all' cycles, the percentage of 'freeze all' cycles was 30.5% in 2017 and 32.7% in 2018, up from 13.1% in 2014. In countries reporting at least one retrieval cycle in which all embryos were frozen, the percentage of retrievals with no fresh embryo transfer increased (36.2% in 2017 and 36.8% in 2018, up from 20.1% in 2014). The number of PGT cycles in 2018 (172 247) was nearly 5-fold higher than the number reported in 2014 (36 512) with wide regional variation in utilization of PGT observed. In 2017, the delivery rate for autologous oocytes was 23.5% per oocyte retrieval, with a cumulative delivery rate of 36.4% per retrieval (excluding cycles which utilized PGT). The delivery rates per embryo transfer were 31.8% per autologous fresh transfer, 32.5% per autologous frozen transfer, and 47.3% per transfer after PGT. The delivery rate for transfers utilizing donor oocytes was 33.1% (combined fresh transfer and frozen transfers). In 2018, the delivery rate for autologous oocytes was 23.8% per oocyte retrieval, with a cumulative delivery rate of 37.3% per retrieval (excluding cycles which utilized PGT). The delivery rates per embryo transfer were 31.3% per autologous fresh transfer, 31.9% per autologous frozen transfer, and 48.4% per transfer after PGT. The delivery rate for transfers utilizing donor oocytes was 34.3%. The multiple delivery rate with autologous fresh transfer was 19.7% in 2017, and 18.3% in 2018. For autologous FET, the multiple delivery rate was 16.2% in 2017, and 14.9% in 2018. With oocyte donation (combined fresh and frozen embryo transfers), the multiple delivery rate was 15.9% in 2017, and 13.4% in 2018. Finally, the multiple delivery rate for cycles utilizing PGT was 6.9% in 2017 and 5.5% in 2018.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The data and analysis presented are dependent on the quality and completeness of the data submitted to ICMART, which varies globally. There is little data from the Middle East and some countries in Asia. It is important to note that delivery rates per transfer after PGT required the availability of embryos suitable for transfer, and therefore should not be interpreted as suggesting that PGT increases the overall success of ART per oocyte retrieval. Because of an updated methodology in the calculation of delivery rates and number of babies born, direct comparisons with past reports for these metrics cannot be made. Data are observational and it is not possible to determine the causes for regional differences in utilization, effectiveness, and safety, which are likely due at least in part to regional differences in socioeconomics, culture, resources, and regulations.
The ICMART report is the most comprehensive summary of global ART utilization, effectiveness and safety, currently available. There remain regional disparities in the utilization of ART, suggesting differences in access to care. These data can be used by healthcare professionals, healthcare authorities, patients, and the general public to guide research, decision-making, and policy. The reasons behind regional differences in utilization and effectiveness need to be better understood and addressed.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): ICMART received unrestricted grants from Abbott and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. ICMART also received financial support from the following organizations: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand; Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine; Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation; Red Latinoamericana de Reproducción Asistida; and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. ICMART appreciates the efforts of each of the participating countries and centres which provided data. Disclosures were provided by all authors, with none indicating a conflict of interest for this manuscript. V.L.B. provides an unpaid service as a regional representative for ICMART and is a former Board member of the Executive Council of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. S.D.: Ferring Pharmaceuticals provided an unrestricted grant paid to her institution in support of the African Registry and Network of ART (ANARA). Merck provided an honorarium for presentation at an educational symposium. ESHRE, the African Federation of Fertility Societies, the Egyptian Foundation of Reproductive Medicine and Embryology, the Egyptian Fertility and Sterility Society, and the Latin American Network of Assisted Reproduction provided support for conference attendance as invited speakers (travel/accommodation). S.D. is a member of Science and Technology Advisory Group, HRP WHO, and received support from the WHO to attend the annual meeting. S.D. provides unpaid services as an ICMART Board member, Director of ANARA, and an Observer on the Board of the African Federation of Fertility Societies. G.M.C.: The National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit (NPESU) of the University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney was contracted by ICMART to validate the ICMART data submission and prepare the statistics tables for this report. G.M.C. is the Director of the NPESU and a UNSW employee. G.M.C. is an unpaid board member of ICMART. E.K. is an employee of the NPESU and UNSW. M.B. has received honoraria from Abbott India, Ferring, Intas Pharmaceuticals, Merk Spec, and Organon. J.d.M. has nothing to report. E.E. has no disclosures to report. F.M.B. has no disclosures to report. O.I. has received honoraria for lectures from Ferring and Organon and is an unpaid Board member of ICMART. S.C.J. is on the advisory board of Ferring. M.S.K.: Ferring and Merck have paid consultancy fees, speaker and travel support. M.S.K. participates in EIM ESHRE, German IVF registry, and ICMART. F.Z.-H.: Ferring has paid travel expenses for attending a meeting organized by Ferring. F.Z.-H. is a Latin American Network of ART Founder and honorary member, an Instituto Chileno de Medicina Reproductiva Board member, Director of the Latin American Registry of ART, and a member of Comité de ética y Políticas Publicas Sociedad Chilena de Ginecologia ny Obstetricia. G.D.A. has received travel support from ESHRE to present the ICMART annual report, as the current chair of ICMART.
n/a.
2017年和2018年全球辅助生殖技术(ART)的使用、有效性及安全性如何,呈现出哪些趋势?
83个参与国家报告的2017年ART新鲜周期和冷冻周期总数为2913498个,2018年为3303505个。5年趋势包括采用冷冻胚胎移植(FET)的周期比例增加,以及采用植入前基因检测(PGT)的周期数量增加。
国际辅助生殖技术监测委员会(ICMART)之前的报告已公布参与国家ART的使用、有效性及安全性情况,随着时间推移,周期数量和参与国家数量均有所增加。这些报告描述了ART总体使用情况的区域差异,以及诸如卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)、PGT和单胚胎移植等特定操作使用情况的差异。过去的报告表明,每个周期的分娩率随时间增加,多胎妊娠率随时间下降。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:这项回顾性横断面调查描述了2017年和2018年全球范围内进行的ART程序。参与国家通过国家或地区登记处向ICMART提交数据。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:有83个国家提供了2017年或2018年周期的数据,大多数国家提供了这两年的数据。报告了每个参与国家的汇总数据,并使用ICMART开发的方法进行分析,以计算使用、有效性和安全性指标。
2017年报告的治疗周期总数为2913498个,出生婴儿671012名;2018年治疗周期增加到3303505个,出生婴儿728383名。在对报告国家未报告中心的数据进行估算后,2017年估计的周期数为3107188个,预计出生婴儿814588名。2018年,估计周期数为3568635个,预计出生婴儿870814名。与2014年相比,自体新鲜非PGT周期中ICSI的使用略有下降(2017年为54.6%,2018年为57.3%,2014年为64.8%)。2017年冷冻胚胎移植的比例为55.7%,2018年为57.9%,高于2014年的38.9%。在所有国家中,包括那些未报告“全冻”周期的国家,“全冻”周期的比例在2017年为30.5%,2018年为32.7%,高于2014年的13.1%。在报告至少一个所有胚胎均被冷冻的取卵周期的国家中,未进行新鲜胚胎移植的取卵比例有所增加(2017年为36.2%,2018年为36.8%,高于2014年的20.1%)。2018年PGT周期数(172247个)几乎是2014年报告数量(36512个)的5倍,PGT使用情况存在广泛的区域差异。2017年,自体卵母细胞的每个取卵周期分娩率为23.5%,每个取卵周期的累积分娩率为36.4%(不包括使用PGT的周期)。每次胚胎移植的分娩率为:自体新鲜移植为31.8%,自体冷冻移植为32.5%,PGT后移植为47.3%。使用供体卵母细胞移植的分娩率为33.1%(新鲜移植和冷冻移植合计)。2018年,自体卵母细胞的每个取卵周期分娩率为23.8%,每个取卵周期的累积分娩率为37.3%(不包括使用PGT的周期)。每次胚胎移植的分娩率为:自体新鲜移植为31.3%,自体冷冻移植为31.9%,PGT后移植为48.4%。使用供体卵母细胞移植的分娩率为34.3%。2017年自体新鲜移植的多胎分娩率为19.7%,2018年为18.3%。自体FET的多胎分娩率在2017年为16.2%,2018年为14.9%。卵母细胞捐赠(新鲜和冷冻胚胎移植合计)的多胎分娩率在2017年为15.9%,2018年为13.4%。最后,2017年使用PGT的周期多胎分娩率为6.9%,2018年为5.5%。
局限性、注意事项:所呈现的数据和分析取决于提交给ICMART的数据质量和完整性,全球各地的数据质量存在差异。中东地区和亚洲一些国家的数据较少。需要注意的是,PGT后每次移植的分娩率需要有适合移植的胚胎,因此不应理解为PGT会提高每个取卵周期ART的总体成功率。由于分娩率和出生婴儿数量计算方法的更新,无法与过去报告中的这些指标进行直接比较。数据为观察性数据,无法确定使用、有效性和安全性区域差异的原因,这些差异可能至少部分归因于社会经济、文化、资源和法规方面的区域差异。
ICMART报告是目前全球ART使用、有效性和安全性最全面的总结。ART使用情况仍存在区域差异,表明在获得医疗服务方面存在差异。这些数据可供医疗专业人员、卫生当局、患者和公众用于指导研究、决策和政策制定。需要更好地理解和解决使用和有效性区域差异背后的原因。
研究资金/利益冲突:ICMART接受了雅培公司和辉凌制药公司的无限制赠款。ICMART还获得了以下组织的财政支持:美国生殖医学学会;亚太生殖倡议组织;欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会;澳大利亚和新西兰生育协会;日本生殖医学学会;日本受精与着床学会;拉丁美洲辅助生殖网络;以及辅助生殖技术协会。ICMART感谢每个提供数据的参与国家和中心所做的努力。所有作者均已披露相关信息,无一表明本稿件存在利益冲突。V.L.B.作为ICMART的区域代表提供无偿服务,并且是辅助生殖技术协会执行委员会的前董事会成员。S.D.:辉凌制药公司向她所在的机构提供了一笔无限制赠款,以支持非洲ART登记处和网络(ANARA)。默克公司为在一次教育研讨会上的发言提供了酬金。ESHRE、非洲生育协会联合会、埃及生殖医学与胚胎学基金会、埃及生育与不育协会以及拉丁美洲辅助生殖网络为受邀演讲者提供了会议支持(差旅/住宿)。S.D.是世界卫生组织生殖健康和研究司科学技术咨询小组的成员,并获得世界卫生组织的支持参加年度会议。S.D.作为ICMART董事会成员、ANARA主任以及非洲生育协会联合会董事会观察员提供无偿服务。G.M.C.:新南威尔士大学(UNSW)悉尼分校的国家围产期流行病学和统计单位(NPESU)受ICMART委托,对ICMART的数据提交进行验证,并为本报告编制统计表。G.M.C.是NPESU主任和UNSW员工。G.M.C.是ICMART的无偿董事会成员。E.K.是NPESU和UNSW的员工。M.B.已从雅培印度公司、辉凌、因塔斯制药、默克特种化学品公司和欧加农公司获得酬金。J.d.M.无相关报告。E.E.无相关披露。F.M.B.无相关披露。O.I.已从辉凌和欧加农公司获得演讲酬金,并且是ICMART的无偿董事会成员。S.C.J.在辉凌公司的顾问委员会任职。M.S.K.:辉凌和默克公司已支付咨询费、演讲费和差旅支持费用。M.S.K.参与了ESHRE的EIM、德国IVF登记处和ICMART。F.Z.-H.:辉凌公司支付了参加辉凌组织会议的差旅费。F.Z.-H.是拉丁美洲ART网络的创始人及荣誉成员、智利生殖医学研究所董事会成员、拉丁美洲ART登记处主任以及智利妇产科协会伦理与公共政策委员会成员。G.D.A.作为ICMART现任主席,已获得ESHRE的差旅支持以介绍ICMART年度报告。
无。