Suppr超能文献

在随机UNIRAD试验中,依维莫司辅助治疗根据内分泌治疗基础的差异获益情况。

Differential benefit of adjuvant everolimus according to endocrine therapy backbone in the randomized UNIRAD trial.

作者信息

Saint-Ghislain M, Chabaud S, Dalenc F, Allouache D, Cameron D, Martinez M, Grenier J, Barthelemy P, Brunt M, Kaluzinski L, Mailliez A, Legouffe E, Hardy-Bessard A-C, Giacchetti S, Mouret-Reynier M-A, Canon J-L, Bliss J, Lemonnier J, Andre F, Bachelot T, Cottu P

机构信息

Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.

Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

出版信息

ESMO Open. 2025 Apr 15;10(5):105050. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105050.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The randomized, double-blind UNIRAD trial evaluating the addition of 2 years of everolimus to endocrine therapy in patients with high-risk, early luminal breast cancer failed to demonstrate a benefit. We report the subgroup analyses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomly assigned 1278 patients in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive 2 years of placebo or everolimus, added to endocrine therapy for up to 4 years after initiation. Randomization was stratified by endocrine therapy agent, prior adjuvant versus neoadjuvant therapy, progesterone receptor expression, and lymph node involvement. Subgroup analyses by each stratification factor were pre-specified. Post hoc analyses were carried out according to menopausal status and age. Treatment adherence was also analyzed.

RESULTS

We observed a limited trend toward more favorable prognostic features in tamoxifen-treated patients, with more frequent estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive tumors (88.5% versus 84.1%, P = 0.026) and less frequent pN2-positive status (39.8% versus 46.0%, P = 0.032). In premenopausal women, we observed a numerical benefit of everolimus: 3-year disease-free survival was 86% in the placebo group and 90% in the everolimus group (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.43-1.34). In premenopausal patients treated with tamoxifen (n = 153; 12.3%), we observed an even stronger trend in favor of everolimus as 3-year DFS was 84% in the placebo group and 91% in the everolimus group (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.28-1.02). Early discontinuation of either everolimus or placebo was less frequent in the tamoxifen group than in the aromatase inhibitor group: 48.0% versus 56.9% (P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

The present post hoc analyses generate hypotheses regarding the interaction between menopausal status, tamoxifen, and everolimus in patients with high-risk, ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative early breast cancer. They suggest that tamoxifen alone is an underpowered endocrine treatment in high-risk premenopausal patients.

摘要

背景

评估在高危早期腔面型乳腺癌患者的内分泌治疗中添加2年依维莫司的随机双盲UNIRAD试验未能证明其益处。我们报告亚组分析结果。

患者和方法

我们将1278例患者按1:1比例随机分配,分别接受2年安慰剂或依维莫司治疗,并在开始治疗后最多4年内联合内分泌治疗。随机分组按内分泌治疗药物、既往辅助治疗与新辅助治疗、孕激素受体表达及淋巴结受累情况进行分层。预先设定了按每个分层因素进行亚组分析。根据绝经状态和年龄进行事后分析。还对治疗依从性进行了分析。

结果

我们观察到在接受他莫昔芬治疗的患者中,预后特征有更有利的有限趋势,雌激素受体阳性/孕激素受体阳性肿瘤更常见(88.5%对84.1%,P = 0.026),pN2阳性状态较少见(39.8%对46.0%,P = 0.032)。在绝经前女性中,我们观察到依维莫司有一定益处:安慰剂组3年无病生存率为86%,依维莫司组为90%(风险比0.76,95%置信区间0.43 - 1.34)。在接受他莫昔芬治疗的绝经前患者中(n = 153;12.3%),我们观察到更明显的倾向于依维莫司的趋势,因为安慰剂组3年无病生存率为84%,依维莫司组为91%(风险比0.54,95%置信区间0.28 - 1.02)。他莫昔芬组依维莫司或安慰剂的早期停药发生率低于芳香化酶抑制剂组:48.0%对56.9%(P = 0.028)。

结论

本次事后分析产生了关于绝经状态、他莫昔芬和依维莫司在高危、雌激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性早期乳腺癌患者中相互作用的假设。这些结果表明,单独使用他莫昔芬对高危绝经前患者来说是一种效果欠佳的内分泌治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a84/12020834/707fe6ecf613/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验