Suppr超能文献

了解心脏移植现代时代的保存时间阈值。

Understanding preservation time thresholds in the modern era of heart transplantation.

作者信息

Wang Chen Chia, Briscoe Jessica B, Goerlich Corbin E, Quinn Rachael, Ragheb Daniel, Shirodkar Shivani, Polanco Antonio, Kilic Ahmet, Sharma Kavita, Gammie James, Shah Ashish S, Pasrija Chetan

机构信息

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, MD, USA.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1800 Orleans St Zayed 7, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 16;15(1):13062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96544-z.

Abstract

A 4-h preservation time threshold for cardiac allografts is the current standard in heart transplantation, but novel technologies are proposed to decrease the morbidity associated with prolonged allograft storage. This study examined adult heart transplant recipients from 2000-2015 and 2020-2023 in the United States, stratified into an early (2000-2015) and modern era (2020-2023), then into standard (≤ 4 h) and prolonged (≥ 5 h) preservation time groups within each era. This study reinforced the 4-h threshold in the early era, where prolonged preservation significantly increased one-year mortality (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.36-1.90). However, this association was no longer significant in the modern era (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.85-1.50). A sub-analysis showed that using machine perfusion devices for allograft storage was not associated with one-year mortality (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.79-1.70). Spline analysis demonstrated possible inflection points between 4 and 5 h and 8-9 h in the modern era, and further analysis found that 5-8 h of preservation did not increase one-year mortality (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.80-1.47) relative to the ≤ 4 h group. In conclusion, the association between cardiac allograft preservation duration and morbidity has decreased in the modern era. Today, a 4-h preservation duration threshold may be too restrictive.

摘要

心脏同种异体移植4小时的保存时间阈值是目前心脏移植的标准,但有人提出了新技术以降低与同种异体移植物长时间保存相关的发病率。本研究调查了2000年至2015年以及2020年至2023年在美国的成年心脏移植受者,分为早期(2000年至2015年)和现代(2020年至2023年)两个时期,然后在每个时期内再分为标准(≤4小时)和延长(≥5小时)保存时间组。本研究强化了早期的4小时阈值,即延长保存时间会显著增加一年死亡率(风险比1.60,95%置信区间1.36 - 1.90)。然而,在现代时期这种关联不再显著(风险比1.14,95%置信区间0.85 - 1.50)。一项亚分析表明,使用机器灌注设备保存同种异体移植物与一年死亡率无关(风险比1.15,95%置信区间0.79 - 1.70)。样条分析表明在现代时期4至5小时和8至9小时之间可能存在拐点,并进一步分析发现相对于≤4小时组,5至8小时的保存时间并未增加一年死亡率(风险比1.09,95%置信区间0.80 - 1.47)。总之,在现代时期心脏同种异体移植保存时间与发病率之间的关联已降低。如今,4小时的保存时间阈值可能过于严格。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验