• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新分配系统中心脏移植后生存的预测因素:UNOS 数据库分析。

Predictors of Survival After Heart Transplant in the New Allocation System: A UNOS Database Analysis.

机构信息

From the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Loma Linda University Hospital, Loma Linda, California.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 2024 Feb 1;70(2):124-130. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002070. Epub 2023 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002070
PMID:37862683
Abstract

Clinical predictors of posttransplant graft loss since the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart allocation system change have not been well characterized. Single organ adult heart transplants from the UNOS database were identified (n = 10,252) and divided into a test cohort (n = 6,869, 67%) and validation cohort (n = 3,383, 33%). A Cox regression analysis was performed on the test cohort to identify recipient and donor risk factors for posttransplant graft loss. Based on the risk factors, a score (max 16) was developed to classify patients in the validation cohort into risk groups of low (≤1), mid (2-3), high (≥4) risk. Recipient factors of advanced age, Black race, recipient blood group O, diabetes, etiology of heart failure, renal dysfunction, elevated bilirubin, redo-transplantation, elevated pulmonary artery pressure, transplant with a durable ventricular assist device, or transplant on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or ventilator were associated with more posttransplant graft loss. Donor factors of ischemic time and donor age were also associated with outcomes. One year graft survival for the low-, mid-, high-risk groups was 94%, 91%, and 85%, respectively. In conclusion, easily obtainable clinical characteristics at time of heart transplant can predict posttransplant outcomes in the current era.

摘要

自美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)心脏分配系统改变以来,移植后移植物丢失的临床预测因素尚未得到很好的描述。从 UNOS 数据库中确定了单器官成人心脏移植(n = 10252),并将其分为测试队列(n = 6869,67%)和验证队列(n = 3383,33%)。在测试队列中进行了 Cox 回归分析,以确定移植后移植物丢失的受体和供体危险因素。根据危险因素,开发了一个评分(最高 16 分),以将验证队列中的患者分为低危(≤1)、中危(2-3)和高危(≥4)风险组。受体年龄较大、黑人、受体血型 O、糖尿病、心力衰竭病因、肾功能障碍、胆红素升高、再次移植、肺动脉压升高、移植带持久心室辅助装置、或在体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)或呼吸机上进行移植与移植后移植物丢失增加相关。供体因素如缺血时间和供体年龄也与结果相关。低、中、高危组的 1 年移植物存活率分别为 94%、91%和 85%。总之,在心脏移植时容易获得的临床特征可以预测当前时代移植后的结果。

相似文献

1
Predictors of Survival After Heart Transplant in the New Allocation System: A UNOS Database Analysis.新分配系统中心脏移植后生存的预测因素:UNOS 数据库分析。
ASAIO J. 2024 Feb 1;70(2):124-130. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002070. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
2
Impact of ABO compatibility on outcomes after heart transplantation in a national cohort during the past decade.在过去十年的全国队列研究中,ABO 血型相容性对心脏移植后结局的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1239-45; discussion 1245-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.040. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
3
Impact of "increased-risk" donor hearts on transplant outcomes: A propensity-matched analysis.“高风险”供心对移植结局的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Feb;157(2):603-610. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.08.120. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
4
Effect of human leukocyte antigen-C and -DQ matching on pediatric heart transplant graft survival.人类白细胞抗原-C和-DQ匹配对小儿心脏移植移植物存活的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Dec;33(12):1282-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
5
Optimization of heart allocation: The transplant risk score.心脏分配的优化:移植风险评分。
Am J Transplant. 2019 May;19(5):1507-1517. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15201. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
6
Characteristics and outcomes of left ventricular assist device recipients transplanted before and after the new donor heart allocation system.新供心分配体系前后接受左心室辅助装置移植患者的特征和结局。
Artif Organs. 2022 Dec;46(12):2460-2468. doi: 10.1111/aor.14363. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
7
Three-Year Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes and Strategy After Heart Transplant Allocation Score Change.心脏移植分配评分改变后三年左心室辅助装置的结果和策略。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;226:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.07.001. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
8
Impact of Left Ventricular Unloading on Outcome of Heart Transplant Bridging With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in New Allocation Policy.新分配政策下体外膜肺氧合支持下心移植桥接中左心室卸载对预后的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 21;13(10):e033590. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033590. Epub 2024 May 14.
9
Reassessing Recipient Mortality Under the New Heart Allocation System: An Updated UNOS Registry Analysis.重新评估新心脏分配系统下的受者死亡率:UNOS 登记分析的更新。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jul;8(7):548-556. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 May 14.
10
Heart Transplant Survival Based on Recipient and Donor Risk Scoring: A UNOS Database Analysis.基于受者和供者风险评分的心脏移植生存率:一项器官共享联合网络数据库分析
ASAIO J. 2016 May-Jun;62(3):297-301. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000337.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding preservation time thresholds in the modern era of heart transplantation.了解心脏移植现代时代的保存时间阈值。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 16;15(1):13062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96544-z.
2
Ten hour donor heart ischemic time with 10ºC static storage.10小时供体心脏缺血时间,采用10℃静态保存。
JHLT Open. 2024 Oct 13;7:100163. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100163. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Fifteen-year experience of direct bridge with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to heart transplantation.采用静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合直接过渡到心脏移植的15年经验。
JTCVS Open. 2024 Sep 3;22:286-303. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.08.014. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Heart transplant survival and the use of donors with intracranial bleeding: United Network for Organ Sharing Registry propensity-score matched analysis.心脏移植存活率与颅内出血供体的使用:器官共享联合网络登记处倾向评分匹配分析
JTCVS Open. 2024 Oct 16;22:306-317. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.09.028. eCollection 2024 Dec.