Alqadi A, Taha N A
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O.Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s40368-025-01039-0.
Diverse treatment modalities are available for managing deep caries in primary dentition, with a growing interest in minimally invasive approaches. It remains unclear which treatment modality is applied by dentists in daily practice. This study aimed to explore the general dental practitioners' (GDP), and paediatric dentists' (PD) approaches to managing deep caries in primary molars.
An online questionnaire was distributed using the Google Form survey tool to dentists across Jordan. Descriptive data analysis was performed. Chi-square was used to analyse correlations (P < 0.05).
A total of 376 responses were analysed. Almost two-thirds of participants were GDPs (58.8%), 23.4% were PDs, 14.1% were paediatric PGs and 3.7% were academics. For asymptomatic teeth, indirect pulp capping (IPC) was the most opted treatment among all participants (N = 129; 34.3%) followed by the Hall technique (N = 70;18.6%). IPC and Hall techniques were significantly more selected by PDs (P < 0.001). For teeth with symptoms of reversible pulpitis, most participants preferred pulpotomy (N = 152; 40.4%), followed by IPC (N = 125; 33.2%). IPC was significantly more selected by PDs (P < 0.001). For teeth with symptoms of irreversible pulpitis, pulpotomy was preferred by most participants (N = 263; 69.9%).
The PD approach favours less invasive biologically based interventions for managing asymptomatic and reversibly inflamed primary molars. GDPs require further education on less invasive biologically based interventions.
乳牙深龋有多种治疗方式,微创方法越来越受到关注。目前尚不清楚牙医在日常实践中采用哪种治疗方式。本研究旨在探讨全科牙医(GDP)和儿童牙医(PD)处理乳牙深龋的方法。
通过谷歌表单调查工具向约旦各地的牙医发放在线问卷。进行描述性数据分析。采用卡方检验分析相关性(P < 0.05)。
共分析了376份回复。近三分之二的参与者是全科牙医(58.8%),23.4%是儿童牙医,14.1%是儿童专科研究生,3.7%是学者。对于无症状的牙齿,间接盖髓术(IPC)是所有参与者中最常选择的治疗方法(N = 129;34.3%),其次是霍尔技术(N = 70;18.6%)。儿童牙医显著更多地选择IPC和霍尔技术(P < 0.001)。对于有可逆性牙髓炎症状的牙齿,大多数参与者更喜欢牙髓切断术(N = 152;40.4%),其次是IPC(N = 125;33.2%)。儿童牙医显著更多地选择IPC(P < 0.001)。对于有不可逆性牙髓炎症状的牙齿,大多数参与者更喜欢牙髓切断术(N = 263;69.9%)。
儿童牙医倾向于采用侵入性较小的基于生物学的干预措施来处理无症状和可逆性炎症的乳牙。全科牙医需要接受关于侵入性较小的基于生物学的干预措施的进一步教育。