Suppr超能文献

子宫内膜损伤对生殖结局的影响:一项更新的荟萃分析结果

The impact of endometrial injury on reproductive outcomes: results of an updated meta-analysis.

作者信息

Nahshon Chen, Sagi-Dain Lena, Dirnfeld Martha

机构信息

Reproductive Endocrinology and IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carmel Medical Center Ruth & Bruce Faculty of Medicine, Technion Haifa Israel.

出版信息

Reprod Med Biol. 2020 Sep 17;19(4):334-349. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12348. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is still unclear whether endometrial injury (EI) has a beneficial effect on reproductive outcomes, and if so, the optimal procedure characteristics are not clear. All previous papers concluded that more research is needed, and as additional studies were recently published, the insights on EI have changed significantly.

METHODS

Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, to identify randomized controlled trials examining the EI effect on IVF outcomes in women at least one previous failed cycle.

RESULTS

2015 references were identified through database searching. Ultimately, 17 studies were included, involving 3016 patients. Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (RR = 1.19, [95% CI 1.06-1.32], = .003) and live birth rate (LBR) (RR = 1.18, [95%CI 1.04-1.34], = .009) were significantly improved after EI. Number of previous failed cycles, maternal age, and hysteroscopy were found to be relevant confounders. Higher CPR and LBR were found when EI was performed twice, while performing EI once did not significantly improve reproductive rates.

CONCLUSION

According to the present meta-analysis, EI may be offered to younger patients with few previous failed cycles and should be additionally studied in an RCT comparing different timing and more than one EI before treatment.

摘要

背景

子宫内膜损伤(EI)对生殖结局是否具有有益作用仍不明确,即便有作用,最佳手术特征也不清楚。以往所有论文均得出需要更多研究的结论,随着近期更多研究发表,对EI的认识已发生显著变化。

方法

在MEDLINE、Embase、科学网和考克兰图书馆进行检索,以识别针对至少有一次既往周期失败的女性,研究EI对体外受精结局影响的随机对照试验。

结果

通过数据库检索识别出2015篇参考文献。最终纳入17项研究,涉及3016例患者。EI后临床妊娠率(CPR)(RR = 1.19,[95%CI 1.06 - 1.32],P = 0.003)和活产率(LBR)(RR = 1.18,[95%CI 1.04 - 1.34],P = 0.009)显著提高。发现既往失败周期数、产妇年龄和宫腔镜检查是相关混杂因素。EI进行两次时CPR和LBR更高,而进行一次EI并未显著提高生殖率。

结论

根据本荟萃分析,EI可应用于既往失败周期数少的年轻患者,且在治疗前比较不同时机和不止一次EI的随机对照试验中应进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1f/7542009/c17d840ac41a/RMB2-19-334-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验