• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Social networks illustrate harm reduction mechanisms in recovery homes.社交网络展示了康复之家的减少伤害机制。
J Prev Interv Community. 2025;53(2):209-219. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2025.2491864. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
2
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.
3
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Self-Set Goals: Autistic Adults Facilitating Their Self-Determination Through Digitally Mediated Social Stories.自我设定目标:成年自闭症患者通过数字媒介社交故事促进自我决定
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):25-38. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0063. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Prevention of self-harm and suicide in young people up to the age of 25 in education settings.在教育环境中预防25岁及以下年轻人的自我伤害和自杀行为。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD013844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013844.pub2.
8
The influence of familial networks and stigma on prison-based medication initiation for individuals with opioid use disorder: Clinicians' perceptions.家族网络和污名对阿片类药物使用障碍患者入监药物治疗起始的影响:临床医生的看法。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Jul;162:209353. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209353. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
9
Expansion and evaluation of level II and III recovery residences for people taking medications for an opioid use disorder: project HOMES (Housing for MAR Expanded Services) study protocol.为接受阿片类物质使用障碍药物治疗的人扩大和评估二级和三级康复住所:项目 HOMES(MAR 扩大服务住房)研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 4;14(11):e084115. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084115.
10
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Systems Theory to Improve Intervention Outcomes.运用系统理论改善干预效果。
Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2022 Aug;53(4):415-422. doi: 10.1037/pro0000467. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
2
Lived experiences of Oxford House residents prescribed medication-assisted treatment.牛津屋居民接受药物辅助治疗的生活体验。
J Community Psychol. 2023 Sep;51(7):2828-2844. doi: 10.1002/jcop.23038. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
3
Social integration in recovery living environments: A dynamic network approach.康复生活环境中的社会融合:一种动态网络方法。
J Community Psychol. 2022 Apr;50(3):1616-1625. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22739. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Different Treatment Pathways for Opioid Use Disorder.不同阿片类药物使用障碍治疗途径的疗效比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920622. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20622.
5
Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Utilization Among Oxford House Residents.牛津之家居民中用于阿片类物质使用障碍的药物使用情况
Community Ment Health J. 2020 Jul;56(5):925-932. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00558-y. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
6
Recovery home networks as social capital.康复家庭网络作为社会资本。
J Community Psychol. 2020 Apr;48(3):645-657. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22277. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
7
The Reliability and Reciprocity of a Social Network Measure.一种社交网络测量方法的可靠性与互惠性。
Alcohol Treat Q. 2017;35(4):317-327. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2017.1355220. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
8
Oxford House Residents' Attitudes Toward Medication Assisted Treatment Use in Fellow Residents.牛津之家居民对同住居民使用药物辅助治疗的态度
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Jul;54(5):571-577. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0218-4. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
9
A Comparison of Reinforcement Based Treatment (RBT) versus RBT plus Recovery Housing (RBT).基于强化的治疗(RBT)与RBT加康复住房(RBT)的比较。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Jan;72:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
10
Social Networks among Residents in Recovery Homes.康复之家居民中的社交网络。
Adv Psychol Study. 2012 May 26;1(3):4-12.

社交网络展示了康复之家的减少伤害机制。

Social networks illustrate harm reduction mechanisms in recovery homes.

作者信息

Sikora Alexander J, Jason Leonard A, Bobak Ted J, Wu Da

机构信息

Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

J Prev Interv Community. 2025;53(2):209-219. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2025.2491864. Epub 2025 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1080/10852352.2025.2491864
PMID:40243131
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12229754/
Abstract

Recovery homes can provide critical support for individuals taking Medications for Opiate Use Disorders (MOUD). However, some abstinence-based self-help groups and organizations have expressed skepticism toward this harm-reduction strategy. One abstinence-based organization that has welcomed those on MOUD is Oxford House. With over 3,000 self-run recovery homes in the US, many individuals on MOUD currently live in these settings. This study examined how Oxford House residents interact and support those on MOUD. We examined these community-based recovery settings with a resident on MOUD over four months. Findings indicated that within Oxford Houses with a resident on MOUD versus those without a resident on MOUD, more positive changes occurred for friendship, advice-seeking, and loaning social network variables. It appears that residents in Oxford Houses where a resident is on MOUD experience positive transformations in their social networks, illustrating how recovery communities can welcome and support those using this harm reduction strategy.

摘要

康复之家可以为使用阿片类药物使用障碍药物(MOUD)的个人提供关键支持。然而,一些基于禁欲的自助团体和组织对这种减少伤害的策略表示怀疑。牛津之家是一个欢迎使用MOUD的人的基于禁欲的组织。在美国有超过3000个自主经营的康复之家,许多使用MOUD的人目前居住在这些地方。本研究调查了牛津之家的居民如何与使用MOUD的人互动并提供支持。我们对一名使用MOUD的居民在四个月内对这些基于社区的康复环境进行了调查。研究结果表明,在有使用MOUD居民的牛津之家与没有使用MOUD居民的牛津之家相比,在友谊、寻求建议和借贷社交网络变量方面出现了更多积极变化。似乎在有使用MOUD居民的牛津之家中,居民在其社交网络中经历了积极转变,这说明了康复社区如何能够欢迎并支持那些使用这种减少伤害策略的人。