• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为接受阿片类物质使用障碍药物治疗的人扩大和评估二级和三级康复住所:项目 HOMES(MAR 扩大服务住房)研究方案。

Expansion and evaluation of level II and III recovery residences for people taking medications for an opioid use disorder: project HOMES (Housing for MAR Expanded Services) study protocol.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA

School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 4;14(11):e084115. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084115.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084115
PMID:39496371
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11535685/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

As the US continues to battle the opioid epidemic, recovery residences remain valuable services for people in recovery. While there is a growing body of literature describing positive outcomes experienced by people who live in recovery residences, little is known about the experience of people who live in these residences while taking medications for an opioid use disorder (MOUD) as part of their recovery. Thus, this study has three aims: (1) expand the availability of recovery residences that meet the National Alliance for Recovery Residences standards in Texas and serve individuals taking medications for an opioid use disorder as part of their recovery; (2) evaluate recovery residences for people taking MOUD as part of their recovery; and (3) compare the cost-effectiveness of recovery residences to treatment-as-usual.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In collaboration with community partners, we opened 15 recovery residences in the State of Texas to house people taking MOUD as part of their recovery. We are collecting quantitative and qualitative data to evaluate outcomes at the intrapersonal, interpersonal, organisational and community levels. At the intrapersonal level, we are assessing changes in behavioural and psychosocial constructs using a longitudinal survey, objectively measuring current substance use with a point-of-interview breathalyser and urinalysis, and examining changes in healthcare utilisation using data obtained from a healthcare information exchange. We are collecting interpersonal data using in-depth individual interviews with residents and staff. We are collecting organisational data using field observation and a cost-effectiveness study, and we are collecting community data using neighbourhood mapping.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The UTHealth institutional review board approved all protocols. We will disseminate study findings via conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications and brief community reports.

摘要

简介

随着美国继续与阿片类药物泛滥作斗争,康复住所仍然是康复者的宝贵服务。虽然越来越多的文献描述了居住在康复住所的人所经历的积极结果,但对于那些在康复过程中服用阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物的人在这些住所中的体验却知之甚少。因此,本研究有三个目的:(1)扩大符合国家康复住所联盟标准的康复住所的供应,为正在康复过程中服用 MOUD 的个人提供服务;(2)评估康复住所对正在康复过程中服用 MOUD 的人的效果;(3)比较康复住所与常规治疗的成本效益。

方法和分析

我们与社区合作伙伴合作,在德克萨斯州开设了 15 家康复住所,为正在康复过程中服用 MOUD 的人提供住所。我们正在收集定量和定性数据,以评估个人、人际关系、组织和社区层面的结果。在个人层面,我们使用纵向调查评估行为和心理社会结构的变化,使用即时呼吸测试和尿液分析客观测量当前的物质使用情况,并使用从医疗保健信息交换中获得的数据检查医疗保健利用的变化。我们通过对居民和工作人员进行深入的个人访谈收集人际关系数据。我们使用现场观察和成本效益研究收集组织数据,使用社区地图收集社区数据。

伦理和传播

UTHealth 机构审查委员会批准了所有协议。我们将通过会议演讲、同行评议出版物和简短的社区报告来传播研究结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf0d/11535685/11f102fed476/bmjopen-14-11-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf0d/11535685/9f38b4b931e1/bmjopen-14-11-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf0d/11535685/5075423fe79e/bmjopen-14-11-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf0d/11535685/11f102fed476/bmjopen-14-11-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf0d/11535685/9f38b4b931e1/bmjopen-14-11-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf0d/11535685/5075423fe79e/bmjopen-14-11-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf0d/11535685/11f102fed476/bmjopen-14-11-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Expansion and evaluation of level II and III recovery residences for people taking medications for an opioid use disorder: project HOMES (Housing for MAR Expanded Services) study protocol.为接受阿片类物质使用障碍药物治疗的人扩大和评估二级和三级康复住所:项目 HOMES(MAR 扩大服务住房)研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 4;14(11):e084115. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084115.
2
Supervised dosing with a long-acting opioid medication in the management of opioid dependence.在阿片类药物依赖管理中使用长效阿片类药物进行监督给药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 27;4(4):CD011983. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011983.pub2.
3
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints for older people in all long-term care settings.预防和减少所有长期护理环境中老年人使用身体约束的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD007546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007546.pub3.
4
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints of older people in general hospital settings.预防和减少一般医院环境中老年人身体约束使用的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD012476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012476.pub2.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
Interventions for preventing abuse in the elderly.预防老年人受虐待的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;2016(8):CD010321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010321.pub2.
9
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
10
Oral naltrexone as a treatment for relapse prevention in formerly opioid-dependent drug users: a systematic review and economic evaluation.口服纳曲酮用于预防曾对阿片类药物依赖的吸毒者复吸:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Feb;11(6):iii-iv, 1-85. doi: 10.3310/hta11060.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustaining substance use recovery housing for people taking medications for opioid use disorder: diverse funding, strategic partnerships, and charging rent.为使用药物治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的人维持物质使用康复住房:多样化的资金、战略伙伴关系和收取租金。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;13:1528971. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1528971. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
"Being here is saving my life": Resident experiences of living in recovery residences for people taking medication for an opioid use disorder.“来到这里拯救了我的生命”:服用药物治疗阿片类物质使用障碍者在康复住所的居住体验
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Mar;158:209242. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209242. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
2
Identifying the availability of recovery housing in the U.S.: The NSTARR project.识别美国康复住房的供应情况:NSTARR 项目。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Jan 1;230:109188. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109188. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
3
Supporting individuals using medications for opioid use disorder in recovery residences: challenges and opportunities for addressing the opioid epidemic.
支持在康复住所中使用药物治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的个人:解决阿片类药物流行的挑战和机遇。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2020 May 3;46(3):266-272. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1719410. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
4
Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Utilization Among Oxford House Residents.牛津之家居民中用于阿片类物质使用障碍的药物使用情况
Community Ment Health J. 2020 Jul;56(5):925-932. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00558-y. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
5
Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching.物质使用障碍新型照护模式中的生活体验:同伴康复支持服务与康复指导的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 13;10:1052. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052. eCollection 2019.
6
Improving Recovery Outcomes among MSM: The Potential Role of Recovery Housing.改善男男性行为者的康复结果:康复之家的潜在作用。
J Subst Use. 2019;24(2):140-146. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2018.1523966. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
7
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
8
Several Common Bonds: Addressing the Needs of Gay and Bisexual Men in LGBT-Specific Recovery Housing.数种共同纽带:满足男同性恋、双性恋者中 LGBT 特定康复住所男性的需求。
J Homosex. 2020 May 11;67(6):793-815. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2018.1555394. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
9
Health-promotion research over three decades: The social-ecological model and challenges in implementation of interventions.三十年来的健康促进研究:社会生态模型及干预措施实施中的挑战。
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Feb;46(20_suppl):20-26. doi: 10.1177/1403494817743893.
10
Oxford House Residents' Attitudes Toward Medication Assisted Treatment Use in Fellow Residents.牛津之家居民对同住居民使用药物辅助治疗的态度
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Jul;54(5):571-577. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0218-4. Epub 2018 Jan 4.