Handley Siân E, Cowe Joanne, Tucker Lisa, Marmoy Oliver R, Thompson Dorothy A
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guildford Street, London, UK.
Doc Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10633-025-10020-7.
This study explored the clinical value of routine multichannel pattern reversal visual evoked potential (prVEP) recordings in children without nystagmus.
A single centre, retrospective case note review was carried out of children without nystagmus who had multichannel prVEP recordings from midline, O1 and O2 electrodes referred to Fz to an ISCEV large check (50' check width), reversing 3/s in a full 30° field and right and left 0-15° half fields, during 2020. Full-field (FF) prVEPs were classified as abnormal if midline P100 amplitude and peak time fell outside reference limits. Trans-occipital distribution asymmetry was defined as differences ≥ 20% amplitude between FF-prVEP the O and O at the peak time of the midline P100. Half field (HF) prVEPs acted as the gold standard discriminator of abnormality. The trans-occipital distribution and amplitude of the HF-prVEP ipsilateral positive peak (iP100) were compared for each eye.
FF-prVEP and HF-prVEP data from 63 children were classified. Group 1, 7/63 (11%), had abnormal midline FF-prVEP evidence of visual pathway dysfunction, whilst Group 2, 56/63 (89%), had normal midline FF-prVEPs. Group 2 was subdivided further according to the trans-occipital distribution of FF-prVEPs followed by HF-prVEPs. Group2A, 14/56 (25%), had symmetrical FF-prVEP distribution and normal HF-prVEPs. Group2B, 31/56 (55.4%), had asymmetrical FF-prVEP distribution, but lateralised HF-prVEPs that explained the FF-prVEP asymmetric distribution. Group2C, 11/56 (19.6%), had HF-prVEP evidence of pathway dysfunction with symmetric (n = 2) or asymmetric (n = 9) FF-prVEP distributions. Common referral reasons in all groups were reduced vision, glioma, craniopharyngioma, epilepsy presurgical evaluation, craniosynostosis, papilloedema/disc drusen, with various other specific conditions.
Multichannel prVEPs add value to investigations of reduced or unexplained vision in children without nystagmus. Visual pathway abnormalities would not have been identified without a multichannel FF- or HF-prVEP in 11/56 (19.6%) of children in this study who had normal midline FF-prVEPs.
本研究探讨了常规多通道图形翻转视觉诱发电位(prVEP)记录在无眼球震颤儿童中的临床价值。
对2020年期间从位于Fz的中线、O1和O2电极进行多通道prVEP记录的无眼球震颤儿童进行了单中心回顾性病例记录审查。全视野(FF)prVEP如果中线P100波幅和峰时超出参考范围则被分类为异常。枕部跨中线分布不对称定义为在中线P100峰时FF-prVEP的O1和O2之间波幅差异≥20%。半视野(HF)prVEP作为异常的金标准鉴别指标。比较了每只眼睛HF-prVEP同侧正峰(iP100)的枕部跨中线分布和波幅。
对63名儿童的FF-prVEP和HF-prVEP数据进行了分类。第1组,7/63(11%),有中线FF-prVEP视觉通路功能障碍的异常证据,而第2组,56/63(89%),中线FF-prVEP正常。第2组根据FF-prVEP随后是HF-prVEP的枕部跨中线分布进一步细分。第2A组,14/56(25%),FF-prVEP分布对称且HF-prVEP正常。第2B组,31/56(55.4%),FF-prVEP分布不对称,但HF-prVEP呈侧化,解释了FF-prVEP的不对称分布。第2C组,11/56(19.6%),有HF-prVEP通路功能障碍的证据,FF-prVEP分布对称(n = 2)或不对称(n = 9)。所有组常见的转诊原因是视力下降、胶质瘤、颅咽管瘤、癫痫术前评估、颅缝早闭、视乳头水肿/视盘玻璃疣,以及各种其他特定情况。
多通道prVEP为无眼球震颤儿童视力下降或不明原因视力问题的检查增加了价值。在本研究中,56名中线FF-prVEP正常的儿童中有11/56(19.6%)如果没有多通道FF-或HF-prVEP就无法发现视觉通路异常。