Suppr超能文献

评估乌干达农村地区结核病患者漏诊对治疗成功率影响的因果推断方法。

Causal inference methodologies to assess the effect of missed clinic visits on treatment success rate among people with tuberculosis in rural Uganda.

作者信息

Izudi Jonathan, Cattamanchi Adithya, Bajunirwe Francis

机构信息

Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Center for Tuberculosis, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02553-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although randomized controlled trials are the gold standard design for cause-effect analysis, high costs and challenges around practicability, feasibility, and ethics may limit their use. In such situations, causal inference methods can improve the rigor of cause-effect analysis using observational data but such methods have infrequently been applied in tuberculosis (TB) research. We conducted a parallel comparison across three causal inference methods in order to assess the causal association between missed clinic visit/s and treatment success among people with drug-susceptible bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary TB.

METHODS

We used causal inference methods to analyze cross-sectional data of adults with drug-susceptible bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary TB at clinics in rural eastern Uganda. We compared effect estimates from three causal inference methods, namely instrumental variable analysis, propensity-score analysis (adjustment, matching, weighting, and stratification), and double-robust estimation for cause-effect analysis. The exposure was missing a TB clinic visit/s and the outcome was treatment success defined as cure or treatment completion, both measured on a binary scale. Covariates were selected based on the literature, and their social and biological relevance to the outcome. We report the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval from each causal analysis.

RESULTS

Of 762 participants (mean age of 39.3 ± 15.8 years) included, 186 (24.4%) had missed a clinic visit/s while 687 (90.2%) were successfully treated for TB. Missed clinic visit/s lowered treatment success across all analyses with instrumental variable analysis (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.82), propensity-score analysis (adjustment [OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.82], matching [OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.91)], weighting [OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.91], and stratification [OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.19-0.62]), and double-robust estimation (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Missed clinic visit/s reduced the likelihood of TB treatment success rate across all causal inference methods, supporting a causal relationship. Studies are needed to examine interventions that enhance retention in TB treatment.

摘要

背景

尽管随机对照试验是因果分析的金标准设计,但高成本以及实用性、可行性和伦理方面的挑战可能会限制其应用。在这种情况下,因果推断方法可以提高使用观察性数据进行因果分析的严谨性,但此类方法在结核病(TB)研究中很少应用。我们对三种因果推断方法进行了平行比较,以评估药物敏感型菌阳肺结核患者漏诊/漏访与治疗成功之间的因果关联。

方法

我们使用因果推断方法分析了乌干达东部农村诊所中药物敏感型菌阳肺结核成年患者的横断面数据。我们比较了三种因果推断方法的效应估计值,即工具变量分析、倾向得分分析(调整、匹配、加权和分层)以及用于因果分析的双重稳健估计。暴露因素为漏诊/漏访结核病门诊,结局为治疗成功,定义为治愈或完成治疗,二者均采用二元尺度衡量。根据文献以及它们与结局的社会和生物学相关性选择协变量。我们报告每次因果分析的比值比和95%置信区间。

结果

纳入的762名参与者(平均年龄39.3±15.8岁)中,186人(24.4%)漏诊/漏访,687人(90.2%)结核病治疗成功。在所有分析中,漏诊/漏访均降低了治疗成功率,工具变量分析(比值比0.41,95%置信区间0.20 - 0.82)、倾向得分分析(调整[比值比0.49,95%置信区间0.30 - 0.82]、匹配[比值比0.43,95%置信区间0.21 - 0.91]、加权[比值比0.52,95%置信区间0.30 - 0.91]和分层[比值比(OR)0.34,95%置信区间0.19 - 0.62])以及双重稳健估计(比值比0.49,95%置信区间0.28 - 而85)。

结论

在所有因果推断方法中,漏诊/漏访均降低了结核病治疗成功率,支持二者存在因果关系。需要开展研究以检验提高结核病治疗依从性的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acd2/12004605/b104131890a5/12874_2025_2553_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验