Zhang Hui, Wang Xiaomei, Li Xiaojin, Zhai Jinghua, Li Xiuguo, Guo Yan
College of Basic Medicine, Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Road, Jining, 272067, China.
Jining Medical College design thinking teaching method innovation team, 133 Hehua Road, Jining, 272067, China.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07116-8.
Jining Medical University has adopted the traditional large-class teaching mode in its Histology and Embryology course. In this mode, students' participation and learning outcomes are not satisfactory.
To solve this problem, we integrated design thinking into the large-class flipped teaching.
A mixed methodology (qualitative and quantitative) was employed. Participants were from the university's Clinical Medicine Program, randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. The experimental group received integrated flipped classroom instructions, whereas the control group received traditional large-class teaching. Data were collected using an empathy canvas, questionnaires, and classroom assessments.
Analysis of 24 empathy maps identified 32 learning gains and 18 pain points, categorized into four dimensions: self-awareness, teamwork, learning efficiency, and comprehensive competencies. Survey results showed 89.3% of students found this teaching model enhanced knowledge comprehension, 85.3% reported no increased learning burden, and 80% acknowledged improved comprehensive abilities. Significant gender differences emerged in resource preferences (males favored interactive resources while females preferred structured materials) and perceived learning burden (p < 0.05). Classroom assessments revealed no statistically significant difference between the experimental group (75.87 ± 12.06) and control group (74.25 ± 12.65) (p > 0.05).
The large - class flipped classroom model integrated with design thinking has the potential to enhance learning outcomes and comprehensive literacy without imposing an additional burden. This model shows potential for application in the teaching of histology and embryology. However, further validation is needed to confirm its applicability across different content areas and learning environments.
济宁医学院在其组织学与胚胎学课程中采用传统的大班教学模式。在这种模式下,学生的参与度和学习效果不尽人意。
为解决这一问题,我们将设计思维融入大班翻转教学中。
采用混合研究方法(定性和定量)。参与者来自该校临床医学专业,随机分为实验组和对照组。实验组接受整合式翻转课堂教学,而对照组接受传统大班教学。使用共情画布(同理心画布)、问卷和课堂评估收集数据。
对24张共情地图的分析确定了32个学习收获和18个痛点,分为四个维度:自我意识、团队合作、学习效率和综合能力。调查结果显示,89.3%的学生认为这种教学模式增强了知识理解,85.3%的学生表示学习负担没有增加,80%的学生承认综合能力有所提高。在资源偏好(男性更喜欢互动资源,而女性更喜欢结构化材料)和感知学习负担方面出现了显著的性别差异(p < 0.05)。课堂评估显示,实验组(75.87 ± 12.06)和对照组(74.25 ± 12.65)之间没有统计学上的显著差异(p > 0.05)。
与设计思维相结合的大班翻转课堂模式有潜力在不增加额外负担的情况下提高学习效果和综合素养。这种模式在组织学与胚胎学教学中显示出应用潜力。然而,需要进一步验证以确认其在不同内容领域和学习环境中的适用性。