Marshall Aaron M, Conroy Zachary E
Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA.
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Jun 18;32(4):811-817. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01572-3. eCollection 2022 Aug.
The flipped classroom (FC) model of instruction has inherent barriers to implementation in medical education due to amount of content taught versus time allotted, the widespread adoption of interdisciplinary course structure causing a plethora of instructors responsible for content delivery, and trends to reduce the number of weeks to teach preclinical foundational science. Here we report on a FC model executed in an interdisciplinary endocrinology block in a time-saving manner, while preserving student preferences and satisfaction and improving written assessment performance. In this study, traditional lectures were 100% replaced with pre-session assignments (custom video modules) resulting in less time (- 9 h) spent on first pass learning. In-person, active-learning, case-based sessions were created (+ 8 h) to complete the FC model and achieve higher level understanding. Written assessment performance in the endocrinology block was compared between two cohorts: the FC model and traditional lecture model. The FC model cohort outperformed the traditional lecture cohort on written, multiple-choice assessments (both in-house and NBME assessments). Furthermore, a measured (survey data) student preference for the FC model was observed.
由于所教授的内容量与分配的时间、跨学科课程结构的广泛采用导致负责授课的教师众多以及减少临床前基础科学教学周数的趋势,翻转课堂(FC)教学模式在医学教育中的实施存在固有障碍。在此,我们报告一种以节省时间的方式在跨学科内分泌学模块中执行的FC模式,同时保留学生的偏好和满意度,并提高书面评估成绩。在本研究中,传统讲座被100%的课前作业(定制视频模块)取代,从而减少了初次学习所花费的时间(-9小时)。创建了面对面的、基于主动学习和案例的课程(+8小时)来完成FC模式并实现更高层次的理解。比较了两个队列(FC模式队列和传统讲座模式队列)在内分泌学模块中的书面评估成绩。在书面多项选择题评估(内部评估和美国国家医学考试委员会评估)中,FC模式队列的表现优于传统讲座队列。此外,观察到学生对FC模式有明确的偏好(调查数据)。